• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估人群出生缺陷谱中孤立病例的比例。

Evaluating the proportion of isolated cases among a spectrum of birth defects in a population-based registry.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health, Austin, Texas, USA.

Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Birth Defects Res. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):21-25. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1990. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/bdr2.1990
PMID:35218607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9411263/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Because the etiology and outcomes of birth defects may differ by the presence vs. absence of co-occurring anomalies, epidemiologic studies often attempt to classify cases into isolated versus non-isolated groupings. This report describes a computer algorithm for such classification and presents results using data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR).

METHODS

Each of the 1,041 birth defects coded by the TBDR was classified as chromosomal, syndromic, minor, or "needs review" by a group of three clinical geneticists. A SAS program applied those classifications to each birth defect in a case (child/fetus), and then hierarchically combined them to obtain one summary classification for each case, adding isolated and multiple defect categories. The program was applied to 136,121 cases delivered in 2012-2017.

RESULTS

Of total cases, 49% were classified by the platform as isolated (having only one major birth defect). This varied widely by birth defect; of those examined, the highest proportion classified as isolated was found in pyloric stenosis (87.6%), whereas several cardiovascular malformations had low proportions, including tricuspid valve atresia/stenosis (2.3%).

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first and largest attempts to identify the proportion of isolated cases across a broad spectrum of birth defects, which can inform future epidemiologic and genomic studies of these phenotypes. Our approach is designed for easy modification for use with any birth defects coding system and category definitions, allowing scalability for different studies or birth defects registries, which often do not have resources for individual clinical review of all case records.

摘要

简介

由于出生缺陷的病因和结局可能因是否伴有并发异常而有所不同,因此流行病学研究通常试图将病例分为孤立型和非孤立型。本报告描述了一种用于此类分类的计算机算法,并使用来自德克萨斯州出生缺陷登记处(TBDR)的数据展示了结果。

方法

TBDR 编码的 1041 种出生缺陷中的每一种都由一组三名临床遗传学家分类为染色体、综合征、轻微或“需要审查”。SAS 程序将这些分类应用于病例(儿童/胎儿)中的每一种出生缺陷,然后按层次组合它们,为每个病例获得一个总结分类,增加孤立和多种缺陷类别。该程序应用于 2012-2017 年期间出生的 136121 例病例。

结果

总病例中,49%的病例被平台分类为孤立型(仅有一种主要出生缺陷)。这在不同的出生缺陷中差异很大;在所检查的病例中,被分类为孤立型的比例最高的是幽门狭窄(87.6%),而几种心血管畸形的比例较低,包括三尖瓣闭锁/狭窄(2.3%)。

讨论

这是首次也是最大规模的尝试之一,旨在确定广泛的出生缺陷中孤立型病例的比例,这可以为这些表型的未来流行病学和基因组学研究提供信息。我们的方法旨在易于修改,适用于任何出生缺陷编码系统和类别定义,允许针对不同的研究或出生缺陷登记处进行扩展,这些登记处通常没有资源对所有病例记录进行个别临床审查。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the proportion of isolated cases among a spectrum of birth defects in a population-based registry.评估人群出生缺陷谱中孤立病例的比例。
Birth Defects Res. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):21-25. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1990. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Identifying syndromes in studies of structural birth defects: Guidance on classification and evaluation of potential impact.识别结构性出生缺陷研究中的综合征:潜在影响分类和评估指南。
Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Jan;191(1):190-204. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63014. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Co-occurring defect analysis: A platform for analyzing birth defect co-occurrence in registries.共现缺陷分析:一个用于分析注册中心中出生缺陷共现的平台。
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1356-1364. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1549. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
Classification of isolated versus multiple birth defects: An automated process for population-based registries.孤立性与多发性出生缺陷的分类:基于人群的登记系统的自动化处理。
Am J Med Genet A. 2024 Oct;194(10):e63714. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63714. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Exploring classification of birth defects severity in national hospital discharge databases compared to an active surveillance program.探讨国家住院数据库中与主动监测项目相比的出生缺陷严重程度分类。
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1343-1355. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1539. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Birth defect co-occurrence patterns in the Texas Birth Defects Registry.德克萨斯州出生缺陷登记处的出生缺陷共现模式。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Apr;91(5):1278-1285. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01629-w. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
The risk of birth defects with conception by ART.ART 受孕的出生缺陷风险。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):116-129. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa272.
9
The risks of birth defects and childhood cancer with conception by assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术受孕与出生缺陷和儿童癌症风险。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2672-2689. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac196.
10
Survival of neonates, infants, and children with birth defects: a population-based study in Texas, 1999-2018.1999 - 2018年德克萨斯州出生缺陷新生儿、婴儿及儿童的生存情况:一项基于人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Oct 18;27:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100617. eCollection 2023 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalization Trends for Airway Infections and In-Hospital Complications in Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者气道感染和院内并发症的住院趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2428077. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28077.
2
Enhancing the Classification of Congenital Heart Defects for Outcome Association Studies in Birth Defects Registries.提高先天性心脏病分类,以进行出生缺陷登记处的结局关联研究。
Birth Defects Res. 2024 Aug;116(8):e2393. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2393.
3
Classification of isolated versus multiple birth defects: An automated process for population-based registries.孤立性与多发性出生缺陷的分类:基于人群的登记系统的自动化处理。
Am J Med Genet A. 2024 Oct;194(10):e63714. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63714. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in infant survival for hydrocephaly-Texas, 1999-2017.种族和民族差异对先天性脑积水婴儿存活率的影响——德克萨斯州,1999-2017 年。
Birth Defects Res. 2024 Jan;116(1):e2285. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2285. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
Survival of neonates, infants, and children with birth defects: a population-based study in Texas, 1999-2018.1999 - 2018年德克萨斯州出生缺陷新生儿、婴儿及儿童的生存情况:一项基于人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Oct 18;27:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100617. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Factors associated with nonsyndromic anotia and microtia, Texas, 1999-2014.与非综合征性无耳和小耳畸形相关的因素,德克萨斯州,1999-2014 年。
Birth Defects Res. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):67-78. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2130. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Identifying syndromes in studies of structural birth defects: Guidance on classification and evaluation of potential impact.识别结构性出生缺陷研究中的综合征:潜在影响分类和评估指南。
Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Jan;191(1):190-204. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63014. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in Studying Modifiable Risk Factors for Birth Defects.研究出生缺陷可改变风险因素面临的挑战。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Mar;2(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40471-014-0028-y.
2
Paper 5: Surveillance of multiple congenital anomalies: implementation of a computer algorithm in European registers for classification of cases.论文5:多种先天性异常的监测:在欧洲登记系统中实施计算机算法对病例进行分类
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Mar;91 Suppl 1:S44-50. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20777. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
3
Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies.寻找病因:病因学研究中先天性心脏病的分类与评估
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007 Oct;79(10):714-27. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20403.
4
Guidelines for case classification for the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.国家出生缺陷预防研究病例分类指南。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003 Mar;67(3):193-201. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10012.
5
Etiology of facial clefts: prospective evaluation of 428 patients.面部裂隙的病因:对428例患者的前瞻性评估
Cleft Palate J. 1988 Jan;25(1):16-20.
6
Etiologic heterogeneity of neural-tube defects.神经管缺陷的病因异质性。
N Engl J Med. 1976 Feb 12;294(7):365-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197602122940704.