Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore 21250, MD, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1399 Park Ave., New York 10029, NY, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2022 Mar;241:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
Subjective quality of life can be compromised in individuals with psychosis-risk symptoms, with poorer quality of life being associated with worse functioning and later transition to psychosis. Individuals who experience psychosis-related symptoms also tend to endorse more internalized (or self-) mental health stigma when compared to controls, potentially contributing to delays in seeking treatment and increased duration of untreated psychosis, as well as interfering with treatment engagement and retention in those already receiving care. Despite these findings, and the growing recognition for prevention in earlier phases of psychotic illness, few studies have examined the relation between psychosis-risk symptoms, internalized stigma, and subjective quality of life in a younger, help-seeking sample. The present study examined whether internalized stigma mediates the relation between psychosis-risk symptoms and subjective quality of life in a transdiagnostic sample of youth (M age = 17.93, SD = 2.90) at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR), with early psychosis, or with non-psychotic disorders (N = 72). Psychosis-risk symptom severity was assessed using the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS). Internalized stigma was assessed using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI), and subjective quality of life was assessed using the Youth Quality of Life Instrument - Short Form (YQOL-SF). Internalized stigma fully mediated the relation between psychosis-risk symptoms and subjective quality of life across the full sample (p < .05, f = 0.06). Findings suggest that internalized stigma may be an important target in efforts to improve quality of life for individuals in early stages of psychosis.
主观生活质量可能会在处于精神病风险症状的个体中受到损害,较差的生活质量与较差的功能和以后发展为精神病相关。与对照组相比,经历与精神病相关的症状的个体往往更容易认同内化(或自我)心理健康污名,这可能导致治疗延迟和未治疗精神病的持续时间延长,以及干扰已经接受治疗的人的治疗参与和保留。尽管有这些发现,并且在精神病早期阶段的预防措施得到了越来越多的认可,但很少有研究在年轻的寻求帮助的样本中检查精神病风险症状、内化污名和主观生活质量之间的关系。本研究检查了内化污名是否在处于精神病风险(CHR)、早期精神病或非精神病性障碍(N=72)的青年跨诊断样本中调节精神病风险症状与主观生活质量之间的关系。精神病风险症状严重程度使用精神病风险综合征结构化访谈(SIPS)进行评估。内化污名使用精神疾病内化污名量表(ISMI)进行评估,主观生活质量使用青年生活质量量表-简短版(YQOL-SF)进行评估。内化污名完全调节了全样本中精神病风险症状与主观生活质量之间的关系(p<.05,f=0.06)。研究结果表明,内化污名可能是改善处于精神病早期阶段的个体生活质量的重要目标。