Suppr超能文献

估算可能从质子束疗法而非 X 射线放射疗法中获益的患者比例。

Estimating the percentage of patients who might benefit from proton beam therapy instead of X-ray radiotherapy.

机构信息

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2022 May 1;95(1133):20211175. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211175. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

High-energy Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) commenced in England in 2018 and NHS England commissions PBT for 1.5% of patients receiving radical radiotherapy. We sought expert opinion on the level of provision.

METHODS

Invitations were sent to 41 colleagues working in PBT, most at one UK centre, to contribute by completing a spreadsheet. 39 responded: 23 (59%) completed the spreadsheet; 16 (41%) declined, arguing that clinical outcome data are lacking, but joined six additional site-specialist oncologists for two consensus meetings. The spreadsheet was pre-populated with incidence data from Cancer Research UK and radiotherapy use data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. 'Mechanisms of Benefit' of reduced growth impairment, reduced toxicity, dose escalation and reduced second cancer risk were examined.

RESULTS

The most reliable figure for percentage of radical radiotherapy patients likely to benefit from PBT was that agreed by 95% of the 23 respondents at 4.3%, slightly larger than current provision. The median was 15% (range 4-92%) and consensus median 13%. The biggest estimated potential benefit was from reducing toxicity, median benefit to 15% (range 4-92%), followed by dose escalation median 3% (range 0 to 47%); consensus values were 12 and 3%. Reduced growth impairment and reduced second cancer risk were calculated to benefit 0.5% and 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The most secure estimate of percentage benefit was 4.3% but insufficient clinical outcome data exist for confident estimates. The study supports the NHS approach of using the evidence base and developing it through randomised trials, non-randomised studies and outcomes tracking.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Less is known about the percentage of patients who may benefit from PBT than is generally acknowledged. Expert opinion varies widely. Insufficient clinical outcome data exist to provide robust estimates. Considerable further work is needed to address this, including international collaboration; much is already underway but will take time to provide mature data.

摘要

目的

高能质子束治疗(PBT)于 2018 年在英国开始,英格兰国民保健署(NHS England)为接受根治性放疗的 1.5%的患者提供 PBT。我们寻求专家对供应水平的意见。

方法

向在 PBT 领域工作的 41 位同事发出邀请,请他们通过填写电子表格来提供意见。有 39 位同事做出了回应:23 位(59%)完成了电子表格;16 位(41%)拒绝了,他们认为缺乏临床结果数据,但加入了另外 6 位来自特定站点的肿瘤专家,参加了两次共识会议。电子表格中预先填入了英国癌症研究中心的发病率数据和国家癌症登记和分析服务的数据。减少生长障碍、降低毒性、剂量升级和降低第二癌症风险的“获益机制”也进行了检查。

结果

23 位回应者中有 95%(23 位中的 21 位)同意,认为从 PBT 中获益的根治性放疗患者的比例最可靠,为 4.3%,略高于目前的水平。中位数为 15%(范围为 4-92%),共识中位数为 13%。估计最大的潜在获益来自降低毒性,中位获益为 15%(范围为 4-92%),其次是剂量升级,中位获益为 3%(范围为 0 至 47%);共识值为 12%和 3%。生长障碍减少和第二癌症风险降低预计分别获益 0.5%和 0.1%。

结论

最可靠的获益比例估计为 4.3%,但缺乏有信心的估计所需的临床结果数据。该研究支持 NHS 通过随机试验、非随机研究和结果跟踪使用证据基础并开发证据基础的方法。

知识进展

人们对 PBT 可能使多少患者受益的了解程度低于普遍认知,专家意见差异很大。缺乏临床结果数据,无法提供可靠的估计。需要进一步开展大量工作来解决这个问题,包括国际合作;已经开展了很多工作,但需要时间来提供成熟的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b91/10993980/60434c442cf9/bjr.20211175.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验