• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕妇是否应该了解自己未来盆底功能障碍的个体风险?一项定性研究。

Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9
PMID:35220939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8883628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to explore: • pregnant women's and healthcare professionals' perspectives on provision of individual risk scores for future Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD), • the feasibility of providing this during routine maternity care, • actions women might take as a result of knowing their PFD risk.

METHODS

Qualitative study.

SETTING

UK NHS Health Board.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women (n = 14), obstetricians (n = 6), midwives (n = 8) and physiotherapists (n = 3). A purposive sample of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals were introduced to the UR-CHOICE calculator, which estimates a woman's PFD risk, and were shown examples of low, medium and high-risk women. Data were collected in 2019 by semi-structured interview and focus group and analysed using the Framework Approach.

RESULTS

Women's PFD knowledge was limited, meaning they were unlikely to raise PFD risk with healthcare professionals. Women believed it was important to know their individual PFD risk and that knowledge would motivate them to undertake preventative activities. Healthcare professionals believed it was important to discuss PFD risk, however limited time and concerns over increased caesarean section rates prevented this in all but high-risk women or those that expressed concerns.

CONCLUSION

Women want to know their PFD risk. As part of an intervention based within a pregnant woman/ maternity healthcare professional consultation, the UR-CHOICE calculator could support discussion to consider preventative PFD activities and to enable women to be more prepared should PFD occur. A randomised controlled trial is needed to test the effectiveness of an intervention which includes the UR-CHOICE calculator in reducing PFD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨:①孕妇和医疗保健专业人员对提供未来盆底功能障碍(PFD)个体风险评分的看法;②在常规产科护理中提供这种评分的可行性;③女性得知自身 PFD 风险后可能会采取的行动。

方法

定性研究。

地点

英国国民保健署健康委员会。

参与者

孕妇(n=14)、产科医生(n=6)、助产士(n=8)和物理治疗师(n=3)。通过目的性抽样,向孕妇和产科保健专业人员介绍了 UR-CHOICE 计算器,该计算器可以估算女性的 PFD 风险,并向他们展示了低、中、高风险女性的例子。数据于 2019 年通过半结构化访谈和焦点小组收集,并采用框架方法进行分析。

结果

女性对 PFD 的了解有限,这意味着她们不太可能向医疗保健专业人员提出 PFD 风险。女性认为了解自己的个人 PFD 风险很重要,而知识将激励她们采取预防措施。医疗保健专业人员认为讨论 PFD 风险很重要,但由于时间有限,以及担心剖宫产率增加,除了高风险女性或那些表达担忧的女性外,这种情况在其他女性中都没有发生。

结论

女性希望了解自己的 PFD 风险。作为基于孕妇/产妇保健专业人员咨询的干预措施的一部分,UR-CHOICE 计算器可以支持讨论,考虑预防 PFD 的活动,并使女性在发生 PFD 时做好更充分的准备。需要进行一项随机对照试验,以测试在降低 PFD 方面包括 UR-CHOICE 计算器的干预措施的有效性。

相似文献

1
Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study.孕妇是否应该了解自己未来盆底功能障碍的个体风险?一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9.
2
Knowledge of pelvic floor disorder in pregnancy.孕期盆底功能障碍的相关知识。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jun;30(6):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03891-3. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
UR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction?UR-CHOICE:我们能否向准妈妈提供有关未来盆底功能障碍风险的信息?
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Nov;25(11):1449-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2376-z. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
4
Urogynaecology providers' attitudes towards postnatal pelvic floor dysfunction.泌尿妇科医疗服务提供者对产后盆底功能障碍的态度。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 May;29(5):751-766. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3419-z. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
5
Knowledge, attitude and practice of pelvic floor dysfunction among obstetrical healthcare workers in China: A cross-sectional study.中国产科医护人员对盆底功能障碍的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Oct;50(8):102068. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102068. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Is Something Missing From Antenatal Education? A Survey of Pregnant Women's Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Disorders.产前教育是否有所缺失?一项关于孕妇盆底功能障碍知识的调查。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov-Dec;24(6):440-443. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000465.
7
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction And Its Effect On Quality Of Sexual Life.盆底功能障碍及其对性生活质量的影响。
Sex Med Rev. 2019 Oct;7(4):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Racial Disparities in Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Disorders Among Community-Dwelling Women.社区居住女性盆底功能障碍知识的种族差异
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):287-92. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000182.
9
Is Pelvic Floor Dysfunction an Independent Threat to Sexual Function? A Cross-Sectional Study in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.盆底功能障碍对性功能是一种独立威胁吗?一项针对盆底功能障碍女性的横断面研究。
J Sex Med. 2017 Feb;14(2):226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.323. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Pelvic floor dysfunction, and effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor.盆底功能障碍,以及妊娠和分娩方式对盆底的影响。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal birth: A qualitative study on treatment perspectives.阴道分娩后盆腔器官脱垂:关于治疗观点的定性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43554. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043554.
2
An assessment of the relationship between urethral hypermobility as measured by ultrasound and the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in primiparous women 9-18 months postpartum.一项关于产后9至18个月初产妇中,通过超声测量的尿道活动过度与压力性尿失禁症状之间关系的评估。
J Ultrason. 2024 Mar 14;24(96):20240010. doi: 10.15557/jou.2024.0010. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement.盆腔器官脱垂:女性寻求治疗的经历及改进建议。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 18;23(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02832-z.
4
Prevalence and Severity of Pelvic Floor Disorders during Pregnancy: Does the Trimester Make a Difference?孕期盆底功能障碍的患病率及严重程度:孕期阶段有影响吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 11;11(8):1096. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081096.

本文引用的文献

1
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women.用于治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的子宫托(机械装置)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD004010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4.
2
A qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with pelvic organ prolapse.一项运用元民族志进行的定性证据综合分析,以了解盆腔器官脱垂患者的生活体验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Dec;31(12):2631-2644. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04494-z. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women.盆底肌训练与不治疗或非积极对照治疗对女性尿失禁的效果比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4.
4
Predicting risk of pelvic floor disorders 12 and 20 years after delivery.预测产后 12 年和 20 年发生盆底功能障碍的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):222.e1-222.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Pelvic floor muscle training for secondary prevention of pelvic organ prolapse (PREVPROL): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.盆腔器官脱垂(PREVPROL)二级预防的盆底肌肉训练:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):393-402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32109-2. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT).网片、移植物或标准修复用于行初次经阴道前或后盆腔脏器脱垂手术的女性:两项平行组、多中心、随机、对照试验(PROSPECT)。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):381-392. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31596-3. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂
BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3853. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3853.
8
Pelvic Floor Health Education: Can a Workshop Enhance Patient Counseling During Pregnancy?盆底健康教育:研讨会能否加强孕期患者咨询?
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):336-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000285.
9
Promoting and evaluating scientific rigour in qualitative research.促进和评估定性研究中的科学严谨性。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Jul 15;29(46):36-42. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.46.36.e8830.
10
Urinary incontinence persisting after childbirth: extent, delivery history, and effects in a 12-year longitudinal cohort study.产后持续性尿失禁:一项 12 年纵向队列研究中的程度、分娩史和影响。
BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13395. Epub 2015 Apr 2.