• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的手术技能和肿瘤学结果:JGOG1081s-A1,日本妇科肿瘤学组研究 JGOG1081 的辅助分析。

Surgical skill and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: JGOG1081s-A1, an ancillary analysis of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG1081.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Graduate School of Public Health (Medical Statistics), Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.005
PMID:35221133
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether surgical skill and procedure were related to oncological outcomes in cervical cancer patients who underwent Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (LRH).

METHODS

We previously assessed data of LRH from 251 patients with FIGO stage (2009) IA2, IB1and IIA1 cervical cancer collected for JGOG 1081s study. 1) The JGOG 1081s cohort study was re-examined to refine the surgical details and extend the follow-up period as chart review. 2) Unedited videos for recurrent cases and matched non-recurrent control cases were newly compared by experts for various surgical skills and surgical procedures using the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool, without awareness of the recurrence status as video review.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 46 months, tumors had recurred in 31 of the 251 patients. The five-year Recurrence-Free Survival rate was 86.9% (81.8-90.6) and five-year Overall Survival rate was 93.7% (87.5-96.8). Multivariate analysis from chart reviews found that an experience with LRH of less than 20 cases per institution was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.49, 95%CI 1.12-5.53, p = 0.025). For the surgical video review, we compared 23 videos of recurrent cases with 23 background-matched non-recurrent controls. Lower modified OSATS scores from the video review were consistently trended to have a higher risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our new study has found that LRH surgical experience and skill trended to have better oncological outcomes.

摘要

目的

我们研究了腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(LRH)治疗 FIGO 分期(2009)IA2、IB1 和 IIA1 期宫颈癌患者时,手术技能和手术步骤与肿瘤学结果的关系。

方法

我们之前评估了 JGOG 1081s 研究中收集的 251 例 FIGO 分期(2009)IA2、IB1 和 IIA1 期宫颈癌患者的 LRH 数据。1)对 JGOG 1081s 队列研究进行重新检查,以细化手术细节并延长随访时间,进行图表回顾。2)对复发病例和匹配的非复发病例的未编辑视频,由专家使用改良的客观结构化手术技能评估(OSATS)工具,对各种手术技能和手术步骤进行新的比较,而不了解视频回顾的复发状态。

结果

中位随访 46 个月后,251 例患者中有 31 例肿瘤复发。5 年无复发生存率为 86.9%(81.8-90.6),5 年总生存率为 93.7%(87.5-96.8)。图表回顾的多变量分析发现,机构内 LRH 经验少于 20 例是复发的独立预后因素(风险比(HR)2.49,95%置信区间 1.12-5.53,p = 0.025)。对于手术视频回顾,我们比较了 23 例复发病例和 23 例背景匹配的非复发病例的视频。视频回顾中较低的改良 OSATS 评分与较高的复发风险呈趋势相关。

结论

我们的新研究发现,LRH 手术经验和技能有更好的肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
Surgical skill and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: JGOG1081s-A1, an ancillary analysis of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG1081.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的手术技能和肿瘤学结果:JGOG1081s-A1,日本妇科肿瘤学组研究 JGOG1081 的辅助分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
A retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in Japan during the early years following its introduction: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1081S).一项回顾性评估:日本在腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术引入早期的安全性和有效性:日本妇科肿瘤学组研究(JGOG1081S)。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb;26(2):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01799-3. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
4
Response to: Commentary on "Surgical skill and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: JGOG1081S-A1, an ancillary analysis of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG1081" by Ramirez et al.对拉米雷斯等人对《腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的手术技巧与肿瘤学结局:日本妇科肿瘤学组研究JGOG1081的辅助分析JGOG1081S - A1》的评论的回应
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Jun 5;33(6):1012. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004492.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.腹腔镜辅助根治性阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3839-48. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2406-3. Epub 2012 May 30.
6
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与根治性腹式子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的肿瘤学结局:一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Apr;31(4):504-511. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002086. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗ⅡA1 期宫颈鳞癌的肿瘤学预后比较研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.016. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.早期宫颈癌患者行腹式或腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的生存情况:全国性队列研究及文献复习。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
9
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.IA2至IIA2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与腹式根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项匹配队列研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Sep;26(7):1264-73. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000749.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.比较肿瘤大小≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):564-571. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000994. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy yields comparable outcomes to chemoradiation for stage IB2-IIB and IIIC1-2 cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective study.根治性子宫切除术后辅助化疗与同步放化疗治疗IB2-IIB期和IIIC1-2期宫颈癌的疗效相当:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Sep;36(5):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e82. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Interim analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Japan: a multicenter, prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial.日本机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术的中期分析:一项多中心、前瞻性介入性单臂临床试验。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):1360. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z.
3
Deep learning prediction of error and skill in robotic prostatectomy suturing.
机器人前列腺切除术缝合中误差和技能的深度学习预测
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7663-7671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11341-5. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
4
Effects of tumor spillage prevention in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术中预防肿瘤播散的效果:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e22. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e22. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
5
Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery in Patients with Uterine-Confined and Node-Negative Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study.子宫局限型和淋巴结阴性宫颈癌患者微创手术与开放手术生存结局的比较:一项基于人群的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 14;15(10):2756. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102756.
6
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.