• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肘管手术后伤口裂开。

Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

机构信息

Division of Hand Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA.

Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jun;48(6):622.e1-622.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.012
PMID:35221174
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

摘要

目的

肘管综合征是第二常见的上肢压迫性神经病,持续性症状可能需要手术治疗。手术选择包括单纯减压和尺神经转位。手术切口裂开的原因尚不清楚,以前也没有描述过导致这些并发症发展的因素。

方法

对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间接受尺神经手术的患者进行回顾性评估,以了解术后 3 个月内手术切口裂开的发生情况。共确定 295 例行转位术和 1106 例行单纯减压术的患者。收集患者的人口统计学和既往病史资料,以评估发生手术切口裂开的危险因素。

结果

术后手术切口裂开的总体发生率为 2.5%。在单纯减压组中,手术切口裂开的发生率为 2.7%(30/1106),平均发生在术后 21 天(范围,2-57 天)。在转位组中,手术切口裂开的发生率为 1.7%(5/295),平均发生在术后 20 天(范围,12-32 天)。减压组和转位组的切口裂开率差异无统计学意义。单纯减压组中有 5 例患者和转位组中有 1 例患者需要再次手术缝合伤口。年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况和合并症均未发现与切口裂开的发生有关。

结论

即使术后评估显示切口愈合,单纯减压和转位后仍可能发生手术切口裂开。外科医生应意识到这种可能性,并特别告知患者在手术后数周内仍要小心保护伤口。裂开可能与肘后内侧软组织包膜的血管化不足有关。当发生这种情况时,通常可以通过二期愈合来治疗裂开。

类型的研究/证据水平:治疗性 IV 级。

相似文献

1
Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery.肘管手术后伤口裂开。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Jun;48(6):622.e1-622.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Regional Ulnar Nerve Strain Following Decompression and Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.尺神经沟综合征患者减压及前皮下转位术后的局部尺神经损伤
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):e343-e350. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.095. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.前移位术与单纯减压术治疗肘管综合征的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Dec;89(12):2591-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00183.
4
Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries After In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release Compared With Ulnar Nerve Transposition: A Retrospective Review.原位尺神经松解术与尺神经转位术后并发症及二次手术发生率:一项回顾性研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Apr;42(4):294.e1-294.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Comparative Morbidity of Cubital Tunnel Surgeries: A Prospective Cohort Study.尺神经沟手术的比较发病率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Mar;43(3):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
[Assessment of the effects of surgical treatment options for cubital tunnel syndrome on the ulnar nerve by USG and EMG].[超声和肌电图评估尺神经沟综合征手术治疗方案对尺神经的影响]
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2012;23(2):88-93.
7
Modified simple decompression of ulnar nerve in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: Report of a series of cases.改良单纯尺神经减压术治疗肘管综合征:一组病例报告
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;21(8):974-978. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_198_17.
8
Comparison of in-situ release and submuscular anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome, previously treated with subfascial anterior transfer-A retrospective study of 24 cases.尺神经原位松解与肌下前置治疗难治性肘管综合征的比较:筋膜下前置术治疗后的回顾性研究 24 例
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111061. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111061. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
9
Endoscopy-assisted subfascial anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.内镜辅助下尺神经筋膜下前路转位治疗肘管综合征
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Dec;69(12):1704-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Can We Make Simple In Situ Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow Still Easier?我们能否让肘部尺神经的简易原位减压手术变得更简便?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:908-924.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound Irrigation Prior to Closure During Routine Upper-Extremity Surgery: Is There a Difference in Wound Complications?常规上肢手术闭合伤口前的伤口冲洗:伤口并发症是否存在差异?
Hand (N Y). 2025 Aug 20:15589447251357042. doi: 10.1177/15589447251357042.