Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者阴茎假体植入的系统评价。

A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.

机构信息

Institute of Andrology, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Institute of Andrology, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UCLH, London, UK.

出版信息

Sex Med Rev. 2022 Jul;10(3):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A penile prosthesis (PP) may be inserted for erectile dysfunction (ED) and/or urinary management in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). This group of patients is considered high risk for complications due to their reduced mobility and sensation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the complication and satisfaction rates following PP insertion in patients with SCI.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA checklist. The Medline/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to July 27th 2021. Studies on men ≥18 years who had a PP inserted for ED secondary to SCI were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, assessed for risk of bias and performed data extraction.

RESULTS

Eleven studies including 475 men with SCI were included for analysis. The overall complication rate was 4.2-61.1%. Specific complications included infection, 0-16%; erosion, 3.7-11.1% and mechanical failure, 0-16.7%. The explantation rate was 2.1-16.7% and the revision rate was 2.7-44.4%. Overall, 79.2-92.9% of men were satisfied with their PP and, 36-86.1% were having satisfactory sexual intercourse. In those who used the PP for urinary management ± ED, 86.5--92.8%% were satisfied. Men with SCI had higher rates of complications compared to those without SCI (infection, 2.1-9.1% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%; erosion, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0%; explanation, 2.1-8.3% vs non-SCI, 0.8-5.7%).

CONCLUSION

PP is an option for SCI patients for the management of end-stage ED or urinary function, but the rate of infection, erosion and implant explantation is higher compared with men without SCI. Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the preferred PP due to the lower risk of erosion, however, they are prone to mechanical failure and require good hand dexterity. A thorough pre-operative counselling is essential. Pang KH, Muneer A, Alnajjar HM, et al. A Systematic Review of Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:461-470.

摘要

介绍

阴茎假体(PP)可用于治疗脊髓损伤(SCI)男性的勃起功能障碍(ED)和/或尿液管理。由于这些患者活动能力和感知能力下降,他们被认为是并发症的高危人群。

目的

确定 SCI 患者接受 PP 植入后的并发症和满意度。

方法

根据 PRISMA 清单对文献进行系统评价。检索了 Medline/PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库,截至 2021 年 7 月 27 日。纳入研究对象为≥18 岁、因 SCI 继发 ED 而接受 PP 植入的男性。两名审查员独立筛选所有文章,评估偏倚风险并进行数据提取。

结果

共纳入 11 项研究,包括 475 名 SCI 男性。总体并发症发生率为 4.2-61.1%。具体并发症包括感染 0-16%;侵蚀 3.7-11.1%和机械故障 0-16.7%。假体取出率为 2.1-16.7%,翻修率为 2.7-44.4%。总体而言,79.2-92.9%的男性对他们的 PP 满意,36-86.1%的男性有满意的性生活。在那些将 PP 用于尿液管理±ED 的男性中,86.5-92.8%的人感到满意。与非 SCI 患者相比,SCI 患者的并发症发生率更高(感染:2.1-9.1% vs 非 SCI:0.8-5.7%;侵蚀:2.1-8.3% vs 非 SCI:0%;解释:2.1-8.3% vs 非 SCI:0.8-5.7%)。

结论

PP 是 SCI 患者治疗终末期 ED 或尿功能的一种选择,但与非 SCI 患者相比,感染、侵蚀和植入物取出的发生率更高。可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)是首选的 PP,因为它的侵蚀风险较低,但它们容易发生机械故障,需要良好的手灵活性。术前全面咨询至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验