Yano Hiroki, Nishida Taku, Sugiura Junichi, Keshi Ayaka, Kanaoka Koshiro, Terasaki Satoshi, Hashimoto Yukihiro, Nakada Yasuki, Nakagawa Hitoshi, Ueda Tomoya, Seno Ayako, Onoue Kenji, Watanabe Makoto, Saito Yoshihiko
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Nara Medical University Kashihara Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2021 Dec 27;38(1):97-105. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12672. eCollection 2022 Feb.
When performing an electrical isolation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs) for atrial fibrillation, physicians often need additional radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the carina region between the superior and inferior PVs to achieve a right PV isolation because of intercaval bundles between the right PVs and right atrium (RA). We compared the efficacy of a high-power and short-duration ablation guided by unipolar signal modification (UM) with the conventional method (CM) for ablating epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA.
The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent an initial box isolation of atrial fibrillation from January 2015 to December 2019 at Nara Medical University Hospital. Among these patients, 94 and 65 patients who met the criteria were assigned to the CM and UM groups, respectively. We retrospectively analyzed the anterior ablation line of the right PV using an electroanatomical mapping system. Patients whose initial ablation line included the right PV carina were excluded.
Six and seven patients were, respectively, excluded from the CM and UM groups. Among 88 CM group patients, 21 needed additional right PV carina ablation, while among 58 UM group patients, 30 needed additional right PV carina ablation ( = .001). No anatomical factors were associated with the additional right PV carina ablation.
Compared to the CM group, a box isolation was less achievable without RF ablation at the right PV carina in the UM group. We should consider a long-duration ablation for epicardial connections between the right PV carina and RA.
在对同侧肺静脉(PV)进行房颤的电隔离时,由于右肺静脉与右心房(RA)之间存在腔静脉束,医生通常需要在上下肺静脉之间的隆突区域进行额外的射频(RF)消融,以实现右肺静脉隔离。我们比较了在单极信号修正(UM)引导下的高功率短持续时间消融与传统方法(CM)对右肺静脉隆突与RA之间的心外膜连接进行消融的疗效。
研究对象为2015年1月至2019年12月在奈良医科大学医院接受初次房颤盒式隔离的患者。在这些患者中,分别有94例和65例符合标准的患者被分配到CM组和UM组。我们使用电解剖标测系统对右肺静脉的前消融线进行了回顾性分析。初始消融线包括右肺静脉隆突的患者被排除。
CM组和UM组分别有6例和7例患者被排除。在88例CM组患者中,21例需要额外进行右肺静脉隆突消融,而在58例UM组患者中,30例需要额外进行右肺静脉隆突消融(P = 0.001)。没有解剖学因素与额外的右肺静脉隆突消融相关。
与CM组相比,UM组在不进行右肺静脉隆突射频消融的情况下,较难实现盒式隔离。我们应该考虑对右肺静脉隆突与RA之间的心外膜连接进行长时间消融。