• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子病历的深度数据清理与表型分析可提高感染性心内膜炎的诊断准确性及死亡率评估:中国医药大学附设医院的医学大数据计划

Electronic medical record-based deep data cleaning and phenotyping improve the diagnostic validity and mortality assessment of infective endocarditis: medical big data initiative of CMUH.

作者信息

Chiang Hsiu-Yin, Liang Li-Ying, Lin Che-Chen, Chen Yi-Jin, Wu Min-Yen, Chen Sheng-Hsuan, Wu Pin-Hua, Kuo Chin-Chi, Chi Chih-Yu

机构信息

Big Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomedicine (Taipei). 2021 Sep 1;11(3):59-67. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1267. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.37796/2211-8039.1267
PMID:35223412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8823496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code-based claims databases are often used to study infective endocarditis (IE). However, the quality of ICD coding can influence the reliability of IE research. The impact of complementing the ICD-only approach with data extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) has yet to be explored.

METHODS

We selected the information of adult patients with discharge ICD codes for IE (ICD-9: 421, 112.81, 036.42, 098.84, 115.04, 115.14, 115.94, 424.9; ICD-10: I33, I38, I39) during 2005-2016 in China Medical University Hospital. Data extraction was conducted on the basis of the modified Duke criteria to establish a reference group comprising patients with definite or possible IE. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality were compared between ICD-identified and Duke-confirmed cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) was used to quantify the IE identification performance of various phenotyping algorithms.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients with discharge ICD codes for IE were identified, only 56.7% met the modified Duke criteria. The crude in-hospital mortality for Duke-confirmed and Duke-rejected IE were 24.4% and 8.2%, respectively. The adjusted in-hospital mortality for ICD-identified IE was lower than that for Duke-confirmed IE by a difference of 5.1%. The best PPV was achieved (0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) when major components of the Duke criteria (positive blood culture and vegetation) were integrated with ICD codes.

CONCLUSION

Integrating EMR data can considerably improve the accuracy of ICD-only approaches in phenotyping IE, which can improve the validity of EMR-based studies and their applications, including real-time surveillance and clinical decision support.

摘要

背景

基于国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的索赔数据库常用于研究感染性心内膜炎(IE)。然而,ICD编码的质量会影响IE研究的可靠性。用从电子病历(EMR)中提取的数据补充仅使用ICD的方法所产生的影响尚未得到探索。

方法

我们选取了2005年至2016年在中国医科大学附属医院出院ICD编码为IE(ICD-9:421、112.81、036.42、098.84、115.04、115.14、115.94、424.9;ICD-10:I33、I38、I39)的成年患者信息。根据改良的杜克标准进行数据提取,以建立一个包括确诊或可能患有IE的患者的参考组。比较ICD识别病例和杜克确诊病例的临床特征及住院死亡率。使用阳性预测值(PPV)来量化各种表型分析算法的IE识别性能。

结果

共识别出593例出院ICD编码为IE的患者,只有56.7%符合改良的杜克标准。杜克确诊和杜克排除IE的粗住院死亡率分别为24.4%和8.2%。ICD识别的IE调整后的住院死亡率比杜克确诊的IE低5.1%。当将杜克标准的主要组成部分(血培养阳性和赘生物)与ICD编码相结合时,可实现最佳PPV(0.90,95%CI 0.86-0.93)。

结论

整合EMR数据可显著提高仅使用ICD方法在IE表型分析中的准确性,这可提高基于EMR的研究及其应用的有效性,包括实时监测和临床决策支持。

相似文献

1
Electronic medical record-based deep data cleaning and phenotyping improve the diagnostic validity and mortality assessment of infective endocarditis: medical big data initiative of CMUH.基于电子病历的深度数据清理与表型分析可提高感染性心内膜炎的诊断准确性及死亡率评估:中国医药大学附设医院的医学大数据计划
Biomedicine (Taipei). 2021 Sep 1;11(3):59-67. doi: 10.37796/2211-8039.1267. eCollection 2021.
2
'Caveat emptor': the cautionary tale of endocarditis and the potential pitfalls of clinical coding data-an electronic health records study.“买者自慎”:一则关于心内膜炎的警示故事,以及临床编码数据的潜在陷阱——一项电子健康记录研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Sep 4;17(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1390-x.
3
[Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis:an analysis of 216 pathologically proven patients].感染性心内膜炎诊断标准的评估:对216例经病理证实患者的分析
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;41(10):738-42.
4
External Validation of the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis.2023 年杜克-国际心血管感染性疾病学会感染性心内膜炎诊断标准的外部验证。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 10;78(4):922-929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae033.
5
Accuracy of administrative data for identification of patients with infective endocarditis.用于识别感染性心内膜炎患者的管理数据的准确性。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1;224:162-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
6
Assesment of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis after twenty-years. An analysis of 241 cases.二十年后对杜克感染性心内膜炎诊断标准的评估。对241例病例的分析。
Clujul Med. 2015;88(3):321-6. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-469. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
7
Compared Performance of the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases, 2000 Modified Duke, and 2015 European Society of Cardiology Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in a French Multicenter Prospective Cohort.2023 年杜克-国际心血管感染疾病学会、2000 年改良杜克和 2015 年欧洲心脏病学会感染性心内膜炎诊断标准在法国多中心前瞻性队列中的比较性能。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 10;78(4):937-948. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae035.
8
Advantages of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging over Modified Duke Criteria and Clinical Presumption in Patients with Challenging Suspicion of Infective Endocarditis.18F-FDG PET/CT成像在疑似感染性心内膜炎诊断困难的患者中相对于改良Duke标准和临床推测的优势。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 18;11(4):720. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040720.
9
Enhancing ICD-Code-Based Case Definition for Heart Failure Using Electronic Medical Record Data.利用电子病历数据增强基于ICD编码的心力衰竭病例定义
J Card Fail. 2020 Jul;26(7):610-617. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.杜克标准在感染性心内膜炎诊断中的价值与局限性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):2023-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00116-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of generative AI assistance in clinical nephrology: Assessing GPT-4, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.0 Ultra, and PaLM 2 in patient interaction and renal biopsy interpretation.生成式人工智能在临床肾脏病学中的辅助评估:评估GPT-4、GPT-4o、Gemini 1.0 Ultra和PaLM 2在患者互动及肾活检解读中的表现
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 2;11:20552076251342067. doi: 10.1177/20552076251342067. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Visit-to-visit glucose variability is associated with echocardiographic variables in people with type 2 diabetes: epidemiological and mendelian randomization approaches.2型糖尿病患者的就诊间血糖变异性与超声心动图变量相关:流行病学和孟德尔随机化方法
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 May 20;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01728-2.
3
Association between outdoor air pollutant exposure and refractive error changes: A retrospective clinical practice study.室外空气污染物暴露与屈光不正变化之间的关联:一项回顾性临床实践研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01006-1.
4
The Association Between Cutaneous Wounds and Infective Endocarditis: A Nationwide Self-Controlled Case Series Study in Taiwan.皮肤伤口与感染性心内膜炎之间的关联:台湾一项全国性自我对照病例系列研究
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jul;55(7):640-652. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0306. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
5
Individual and integrated indexes of inflammation predicting the risks of mental disorders - statistical analysis and artificial neural network.预测精神障碍风险的个体及综合炎症指标——统计分析与人工神经网络
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06652-3.
6
Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.利用物联网移动传感设备数据、机器学习算法和框架理论在慢性病监测中的高级应用:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;13:1510456. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510456. eCollection 2025.
7
Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Disease Incidence, Trajectory, and Outcomes.脓毒症相关急性肾损伤的发病率、病程及预后
Kidney Med. 2024 Dec 27;7(3):100959. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100959. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Developing a Polygenic Risk Score with Age and Sex to Identify High-Risk Myopia in Taiwan.结合年龄和性别制定多基因风险评分以识别台湾地区的高度近视风险人群
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 20;12(7):1619. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071619.
9
Impact of polygenic risk score for triglyceride trajectory and diabetic complications in subjects with type 2 diabetes based on large electronic medical record data from Taiwan: a case control study.基于台湾大型电子病历数据的 2 型糖尿病患者甘油三酯轨迹和糖尿病并发症多基因风险评分的影响:病例对照研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Dec;47(12):3101-3110. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02397-0. Epub 2024 May 25.
10
Hemophagocytic syndrome in A patient of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation: A case report.卡介苗灌注后上尿路尿路上皮癌患者发生噬血细胞综合征:一例报告
Urol Case Rep. 2024 Apr 3;54:102730. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102730. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with infective endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者院内死亡的预测因素
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Aug;76(6):642-649. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1767368. Epub 2020 May 26.
2
24-hour Serum Creatinine Variation Associates with Short- and Long-Term All-Cause Mortality: A Real-World Insight into Early Detection of Acute Kidney Injury.24 小时血清肌酐变异与短期和长期全因死亡率相关:急性肾损伤早期检测的真实世界观察。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63315-x.
3
Cumulative incidence and mortality of infective endocarditis in Siriraj hospital-Thailand: a 10-year retrospective study.泰国暹罗医院感染性心内膜炎的累积发病率和死亡率:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):1062. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4689-5.
4
Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis.感染性心内膜炎患者住院期间死亡的危险因素。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Jan;114(1):1-8. doi: 10.36660/abc.20180194.
5
Incidence, characteristics, and mortality of infective endocarditis in France in 2011.2011 年法国感染性心内膜炎的发病率、特征及死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 25;14(10):e0223857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223857. eCollection 2019.
6
'Caveat emptor': the cautionary tale of endocarditis and the potential pitfalls of clinical coding data-an electronic health records study.“买者自慎”:一则关于心内膜炎的警示故事,以及临床编码数据的潜在陷阱——一项电子健康记录研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Sep 4;17(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1390-x.
7
Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future.台湾全民健康保险研究数据库:过去与未来。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May 3;11:349-358. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S196293. eCollection 2019.
8
Risk of Infective Endocarditis After Invasive Dental Treatments: Case-Only Study.侵袭性牙科治疗后的感染性心内膜炎风险:病例对照研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jul 24;138(4):356-363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033131.
9
The Evolving Nature of Infective Endocarditis in Spain: A Population-Based Study (2003 to 2014).西班牙感染性心内膜炎的演变特征:一项基于人群的研究(2003 年至 2014 年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 5;70(22):2795-2804. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.005.
10
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.