• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯洛文尼亚医学生对新冠疫情期间基于距离的教育的认知:一项定性研究。

Medical students' perception of distance-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Rotar-Pavlic Danica, Erzar Ajda, Uštar Barbara, Maksuti Alem

机构信息

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Clinical Institute of Occupational, Traffic and Sports Medicine, Grablovičeva ulica 42, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Int J Educ Res Open. 2022;3:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100135. Epub 2022 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100135
PMID:35224519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8858383/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a broad direct impact on education, and at the same time it has significantly changed students' lives. This study examines how Slovenian medical students experienced the shift to distance-based education following multiple lockdowns.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to examine experiences of medical students about distance-based education in the period of multiple lockdowns in 2020/2021. We used focused interviews to collect data. The questionnaire was developed in the following manner: the first set of questions was developed after studying the literature from Slovenia and abroad about distance-based education in higher education during COVID-19 lockdowns. The researchers then discussed this set to narrow the topics. In addition to preformulated questions, additional sub-questions also typical for focused interviews were asked as part of the research. We carried out a qualitative study using a qualitative content analysis method to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Sixteen interviews were conducted. We defined four categories summarizing students' experiences with distance-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic: 1) technical issues, 2) organization of distance-based education, 3) social exclusion of students, and 4) suggestions for improvement. The categories are exclusive and represent individual topics for further analysis of students' experiences with DBE during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results are supported by quotes from the interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students' experiences with DBE mainly revealed shortcomings in computer literacy. Technical issues were largely an indicator that significantly marked students' transition to DBE. Another important finding is that medical students emphasized problems related to social exclusion. Students made suggestions for improvements that broadly relate to the higher education system, and not only to the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

引言

新冠疫情对教育产生了广泛的直接影响,同时也显著改变了学生的生活。本研究考察了斯洛文尼亚医科学生在多次封锁后向远程教育转变的经历。

方法

本研究旨在考察医科学生在2020/2021年多次封锁期间对远程教育的体验。我们采用聚焦访谈法收集数据。问卷的编制方式如下:第一组问题是在研究了斯洛文尼亚国内外关于新冠疫情封锁期间高等教育远程教育的文献后制定的。研究人员随后对这组问题进行了讨论,以缩小主题范围。除了预先设定的问题外,作为研究的一部分,还提出了一些聚焦访谈中常见的额外子问题。我们采用定性内容分析法进行定性研究以分析数据。

结果

进行了16次访谈。我们定义了四个类别来总结学生在新冠疫情期间远程教育的经历:1)技术问题,2)远程教育的组织,3)学生受到的社会排斥,4)改进建议。这些类别相互独立,代表了在新冠疫情期间进一步分析学生远程教育体验的各个主题。访谈中的引述支持了这些结果。

结论

医科学生在远程教育方面的经历主要揭示了计算机素养方面的不足。技术问题在很大程度上是显著标志着学生向远程教育过渡的一个指标。另一个重要发现是医科学生强调了与社会排斥相关的问题。学生们提出的改进建议广泛涉及高等教育系统,而不仅仅与新冠疫情有关。

相似文献

1
Medical students' perception of distance-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia: A qualitative study.斯洛文尼亚医学生对新冠疫情期间基于距离的教育的认知:一项定性研究。
Int J Educ Res Open. 2022;3:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100135. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
2
Addressing mental health, misinformation, & religious tensions among South Asian students across California higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative research study.应对新冠疫情期间加州高等教育中南亚学生的心理健康、错误信息及宗教紧张关系:一项定性研究
Heliyon. 2023 May 19;9(6):e16396. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16396. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Nursing students' experiences of a pedagogical transition from campus learning to distance learning using digital tools.护理专业学生使用数字工具从校园学习向远程学习进行教学过渡的经历。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jan 19;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1.
4
Distance education and the social literacy of elementary school students during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的远程教育与小学生的社会素养
Heliyon. 2022 Jul;8(7):e09811. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09811. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
Student nurses' educational experiences during COVID-19: A qualitative study.学生护士在 COVID-19 期间的教育经历:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105562. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105562. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
6
COVID-19 pandemic experiences of secondary school students in Turkey.土耳其中学生的新冠疫情经历
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 27:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03111-0.
7
'Who Else If Not We'. Medical Students' Perception and Experiences with Volunteering during the COVID-19 Crisis in Poznan, Poland.'除了我们还能有谁'。波兰波兹南的医学生在 COVID-19 危机期间参与志愿活动的看法和经历。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042314.
8
Now, I think doctors can be heroes … Medical student's attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on key aspects of medical education and how the image of the medical profession has changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.现在,我认为医生可以成为英雄……医学生对 COVID-19 大流行对医学教育关键方面的影响的态度,以及由于 COVID-19 大流行,医疗行业的形象发生了怎样的变化。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022 Mar;172(3-4):90-99. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00891-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Undergraduate medical education amid COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of enablers and barriers to acquiring competencies in distant learning using focus groups.新冠疫情下的本科医学教育:使用焦点小组对远程学习中获取能力的促进因素和障碍的定性分析。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1940765. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1940765.
10
Evaluation of views and perceptions of the medical faculty students about distance anatomy education during the COVID-19 pandemic.评估医学专业学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程解剖学教育的看法和感受。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Jan;44(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02867-7. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Long COVID as a never-ending puzzle: the experience of primary care physicians. A qualitative interview study.长期新冠:一个永无答案的谜题——基层医疗医生的经历。一项定性访谈研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Dec 19;7(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0074. Print 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情封锁期间高等教育中的线上教学
Int J Educ Res Open. 2020;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Student's experiences with online teaching following COVID-19 lockdown: A mixed methods explorative study.新冠疫情封锁后学生的在线教学体验:混合方法探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0250378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250378. eCollection 2021.
3
COVID-19 AND DENTAL DISTANCE-BASED EDUCATION: students' perceptions in an Italian University.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情与远程口腔医学教育:一所意大利大学学生的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02840-3.
4
Rapid transition to online teaching program during COVID-19 lockdown: Experience from a medical college of India.新冠疫情封锁期间快速过渡到在线教学计划:来自印度一所医学院的经验
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Mar 31;10:99. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_606_20. eCollection 2021.
5
E-Learning amid the COVID-19 Lockdown: Standpoint of Medical and Dental Undergraduates.新冠疫情封锁期间的电子学习:医学与牙科学本科生的观点
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jan-Feb;37(1):217-222. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.3124.
6
Assessment of online teaching as an adjunct to medical education in the backdrop of COVID-19 lockdown in a developing country - An online survey.评估在发展中国家 COVID-19 封锁背景下,将在线教学作为医学教育辅助手段的效果-一项在线调查。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;68(11):2399-2403. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2049_20.
7
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
8
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
9
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?定性研究中的抽样。目的性抽样与理论性抽样;界限融合还是界限清晰?
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Sep;26(3):623-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x.