Department of Surgery, Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, 3802Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Innovations (Phila). 2022 Jan-Feb;17(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/15569845221074431.
Omitting pleural drainage after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary wedge resections has been shown to be a safe approach to enhance recovery. However, major concerns remain regarding the risk of postoperative pneumothoraces requiring surgical interventions. Therefore, our objective was to provide conclusive evidence whether chest tube omission after VATS wedge resection is safe and does not increase the risk of pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage.
Five scientific databases were searched. Studies comparing patients with (CT group) and without chest tube drainage (NCT group) after VATS wedge resection were evaluated. Outcomes included radiographically diagnosed pneumothoraces and pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage, postoperative complications, hospitalization, and pain scores.
Overall, 9 studies (3 randomized controlled trials) were included ( = 928). Meta-analysis showed significantly more radiographically diagnosed pneumothoraces in the NCT group (risk ratio [RR] = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56 to 4.29, < 0.001; = 0%). However, no significant differences were found in postoperative pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.63 to 4.74, = 0.29; = 0%) or complications (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.52, = 0.46; = 0%). Furthermore, the NCT group showed significantly shorter hospitalization (mean difference = -1.26, 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.95, < 0.001) with high heterogeneity ( = 58%, = 0.02), and lower pain scores on postoperative day 1 (standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.98, 95% CI: -1.71 to -0.25, = 0.009; = 92%) and postoperative day 2 (SMD = -1.28, 95% CI: -2.55 to -0.01, = 0.05; = 96%) compared with the CT group.
VATS wedge resection without routine chest tube placement is suggested as a safe and less invasive approach in selected patients that does not increase the risk of a pneumothorax requiring pleural drainage.
已经证明,在电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)后省略胸腔引流对于促进恢复是一种安全的方法。然而,对于手术后需要手术干预的气胸风险,仍存在主要顾虑。因此,我们的目的是提供确凿的证据,证明 VATS 楔形切除术后是否可以安全地省略胸腔引流,并且不会增加需要胸腔引流的气胸风险。
检索了五个科学数据库。评估了比较接受(CT 组)和未接受胸腔引流(NCT 组)的 VATS 楔形切除术患者的研究。结果包括影像学诊断的气胸和需要胸腔引流的气胸、术后并发症、住院时间和疼痛评分。
总体而言,共纳入 9 项研究(3 项随机对照试验)( = 928)。荟萃分析显示,NCT 组的影像学诊断气胸明显更多(风险比 [RR] = 2.58,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.56 至 4.29, < 0.001; = 0%)。然而,术后需要胸腔引流的气胸(RR = 1.72,95% CI:0.63 至 4.74, = 0.29; = 0%)或并发症(RR = 0.77,95% CI:0.39 至 1.52, = 0.46; = 0%)无显著差异。此外,NCT 组的住院时间明显缩短(平均差值 = -1.26,95% CI:-1.56 至 -0.95, < 0.001),且存在高度异质性( = 58%, = 0.02),术后第 1 天(标准均数差 [SMD] = -0.98,95% CI:-1.71 至 -0.25, = 0.009; = 92%)和第 2 天(SMD = -1.28,95% CI:-2.55 至 -0.01, = 0.05; = 96%)的疼痛评分也明显低于 CT 组。
建议在选定的患者中,将 VATS 楔形切除术不常规放置胸腔引流管作为一种安全且微创的方法,不会增加需要胸腔引流的气胸风险。