Emergency Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
University of Milan; Pulmonary Medicine Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2022 Feb 22;92(4). doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2022.2054.
The aim of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of CURB-65 and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), the most widely used scores for community acquired pneumonia, and MuLBSTA, a viral pneumonia score, in predicting 28-day mortality in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.We retrospectively collected clinical data of consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted at Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital from February 23rd to March 14th, 2020. We calculated at Emergency Department (ED) presentation CURB-65, PSI and MuLBSTA and we compared their performances in discriminating between survivors and non-survivors at 28 days. Among 431 hospitalized patients, the majority presented with hypoxic respiratory failure: median (interquartile range, IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio at admission was 228.6 (142.0-278.1). In the first 24 hours, 111 (27%) patients were administered low-flow oxygen cannula, 50 (12%) Venturi Mask, 95 (23%) non-rebreather mask, 106 (26%) non-invasive ventilation, 12 (3%) mechanical ventilation and 41 (9%) were not administered oxygen therapy. Mortality rate at 28-day was 35% (150/431). Between survivors and non-survivors, median (IQR) scores were, respectively, 1.0 (1.0-2.0) and 2.0 (2.0-3.0) for CURB-65 (p<0.001); 90.5 (76.0-105.5) and 115.0 (100.0-129.0) for PSI (p<0.001); 7.0 (5.0-10.0) and 11.0 (9.0-13.0) for MuLBSTA (p<0.001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for each score were, respectively, 0.725 (0.662-0.787), 0.776 (0.693-0.859) and 0.743 (0.680-0.806) (p>0,05). PSI and MuLBSTA did not show a better performance when compared to CURB-65. Although CURB-65, PSI and MuLBSTA scores are useful tools to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors in COVID-19 pneumonia, their diagnostic accuracy in discriminating 28-day mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia is moderate, as confirmed by AUCs <0.80, and there is a potential underestimation of disease severity in the low-risk classes. For this reason, they should not be recommended in ED to decide between inpatient and outpatient management in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia.
我们的研究目的是评估 CURB-65 和肺炎严重指数(PSI)这两种最常用于社区获得性肺炎的评分系统,以及 MuLBSTA 病毒肺炎评分在预测 2019 冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)肺炎 28 天死亡率方面的准确性。我们回顾性收集了 2020 年 2 月 23 日至 3 月 14 日在 Papa Giovanni XXIII 医院住院的经实验室确诊的 COVID-19 肺炎患者的临床数据。我们在急诊室(ED)就诊时计算了 CURB-65、PSI 和 MuLBSTA,并比较了它们在区分 28 天内幸存者和非幸存者方面的表现。在 431 名住院患者中,大多数患者表现为低氧性呼吸衰竭:入院时中位数(四分位距,IQR)PaO2/FiO2 比值为 228.6(142.0-278.1)。在最初的 24 小时内,111 名(27%)患者给予低流量氧气管,50 名(12%)文丘里面罩,95 名(23%)非再呼吸面罩,106 名(26%)无创通气,12 名(3%)机械通气,41 名(9%)未给予氧疗。28 天死亡率为 35%(150/431)。在幸存者和非幸存者之间,CURB-65 中位数(IQR)评分分别为 1.0(1.0-2.0)和 2.0(2.0-3.0)(p<0.001);PSI 中位数(IQR)评分分别为 90.5(76.0-105.5)和 115.0(100.0-129.0)(p<0.001);MuLBSTA 中位数(IQR)评分分别为 7.0(5.0-10.0)和 11.0(9.0-13.0)(p<0.001)。每个评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.725(0.662-0.787)、0.776(0.693-0.859)和 0.743(0.680-0.806)(p>0.05)。PSI 和 MuLBSTA 与 CURB-65 相比并没有表现出更好的性能。尽管 CURB-65、PSI 和 MuLBSTA 评分是区分 COVID-19 肺炎幸存者和非幸存者的有用工具,但它们在区分 COVID-19 肺炎 28 天死亡率方面的诊断准确性中等,AUC 值均<0.80,并且在低危人群中存在疾病严重程度的潜在低估。因此,不建议在 ED 中使用这些评分来决定 COVID-19 肺炎患者的住院或门诊管理。