Galati Luisa, Combes Jean-Damien, Le Calvez-Kelm Florence, McKay-Chopin Sandrine, Forey Nathalie, Ratel Mathis, McKay James, Waterboer Tim, Schroeder Lea, Clifford Gary, Tommasino Massimo, Gheit Tarik
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Infections and Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0148021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01480-21. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) circulating tumor DNA (HPV ctDNA) was proposed as a biomarker for the detection and disease monitoring of HPV-related cancers. One hundred eighty plasma samples obtained from women diagnosed with HPV16-positive cervical cancer (CC) ( = 100), HPV16-positive premalignant lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 [CIN3]) ( = 20), and HPV DNA-negative controls ( = 60) were randomly selected from the archives for evaluating the performance of a bead-based HPV genotyping assay (E7 type-specific multiplex genotyping assay [E7-MPG]) in detecting HPV16 ctDNA. The performance of the E7-MPG was compared with those of DNA detection by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and detection of HPV16 E6 antibodies evaluated in an independent study. Internal controls to assess DNA quality were included in the molecular assays, i.e., beta-globin and ESR1, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of E7-MPG and/or E6 antibodies to detect HPV16-positive CCs were evaluated. HPV16 ctDNA was detected using the E7-MPG in 42.3% of all plasma samples and in 74.7% of plasma samples from HPV16-positive CC cases. The validation of E7-MPG data by ddPCR showed that the sensitivity of the E7-MPG test for HPV16-positive CC detection was higher than that of ddPCR (74.7% versus 63.1%; < 0.001). When both HPV16 ctDNA and E6 antibodies were considered, the sensitivity for HPV16-positive CC detection increased from 74.7% to 86.1%, while the specificity was unchanged at 97.8%. The performance of E7-MPG for the detection of HPV16 ctDNA appears to be at least as sensitive as that of ddPCR, offering an additional tool for ctDNA detection of HPV16-positive CC. The use of an additional blood marker of HPV infection, such as E6 antibodies, further improved the detection of CC. The validity of HPV ctDNA as a marker of HPV-driven cancers has been previously reported. Herein we validated an alternative to ddPCR for HPV16 ctDNA detection, using a bead-based HPV genotyping assay that offers the potential advantage of reducing the cost of clinical management due to the multiplex capability of the test, thus facilitating its use in clinical settings. In addition, we analyzed HPV ctDNA in the context of E6 antibodies as an additional HPV marker. The HPV16 ctDNA biomarker appeared to be highly specific and, to a lesser extent, sensitive for the detection of CC, mainly indicated for those at an advanced tumor stage. In this proof-of-principle study, E6 antibodies were mainly detected in early tumor stages of CC, while HPV ctDNA was mainly positive at advanced tumor stages.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)循环肿瘤DNA(HPV ctDNA)被提议作为检测和监测HPV相关癌症的生物标志物。从被诊断为HPV16阳性宫颈癌(CC)(n = 100)、HPV16阳性癌前病变(宫颈上皮内瘤变3级[CIN3])(n = 20)和HPV DNA阴性对照(n = 60)的女性中随机选取180份血浆样本,用于评估基于磁珠的HPV基因分型检测(E7型特异性多重基因分型检测[E7-MPG])检测HPV16 ctDNA的性能。将E7-MPG的性能与液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)检测DNA以及在一项独立研究中评估的HPV16 E6抗体检测的性能进行比较。分子检测中包括用于评估DNA质量的内部对照,即分别为β-珠蛋白和ESR1。评估了E7-MPG和/或E6抗体检测HPV16阳性CC的敏感性和特异性。使用E7-MPG在所有血浆样本的42.3%以及HPV16阳性CC病例的74.7%的血浆样本中检测到HPV16 ctDNA。通过ddPCR对E7-MPG数据进行验证表明,E7-MPG检测HPV16阳性CC的敏感性高于ddPCR(74.7%对63.1%;P < 0.001)。当同时考虑HPV16 ctDNA和E6抗体时,检测HPV16阳性CC的敏感性从74.7%提高到86.1%,而特异性保持在97.8%不变。E7-MPG检测HPV16 ctDNA的性能似乎至少与ddPCR一样敏感,为HPV16阳性CC的ctDNA检测提供了另一种工具。使用HPV感染的另一种血液标志物,如E6抗体,进一步提高了CC的检测率。HPV ctDNA作为HPV驱动癌症标志物的有效性此前已有报道。在此,我们验证了一种替代ddPCR检测HPV16 ctDNA的方法,使用基于磁珠的HPV基因分型检测,该检测由于其检测的多重能力而具有降低临床管理成本的潜在优势,从而便于其在临床环境中的应用。此外,我们在E6抗体作为另一种HPV标志物的背景下分析了HPV ctDNA。HPV16 ctDNA生物标志物似乎具有高度特异性,在一定程度上对CC检测敏感,主要适用于晚期肿瘤阶段的患者。在这项原理验证研究中,E6抗体主要在CC的早期肿瘤阶段检测到,而HPV ctDNA主要在晚期肿瘤阶段呈阳性。