*Burcu Oglakci, DDS, assistant professor, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Defne Burduroğlu, DDS, PhD, prosthetic dentistry specialist, Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Oper Dent. 2022 Jan 1;47(1):43-54. doi: 10.2341/20-066-L.
This laboratory study was designed to evaluate the marginal adaptation of Class II mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) restorations at the cervical region with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Two groups of restorations were compared: 1) those that had been exposed to radiotherapy before restoration was performed using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes; and 2) those that had previously been restored using a universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes and had subsequently undergone radiotherapy. Sixty intact human molars were randomly divided into groups according to irradiation status: no radiotherapy (control group); radiotherapy followed by restoration (radiotherapy-first group); and restoration followed by radiotherapy (restoration-first group). These three groups were then subdivided into two groups each on the basis of adhesive application type (etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes), for a total of six groups (n=10/group). Standardized Class II MOD cavities were prepared. A universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray, Okayama, Japan) was applied. The teeth were restored with resin composite (Estelite Posterior Quick, Tokuyama, Tokyo, Japan). The radiotherapy protocol was conducted with 60 gray (Gy) at 2 Gy/day, five days a week for six weeks. Adhesive defects were analyzed in distal and mesial views and evaluated with micro-CT (SkyScan 1174v2, Kontich, Antwerp, Belgium) on the basis of the volume of black spaces between the cavity walls and the restorative materials (mm3). The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). The radiotherapy protocol did not affect the marginal adaptation of the universal adhesive at the cervical regions. Regarding the application modes, for the radiotherapy-first group, the self-etch mode caused significantly higher adhesive defects than the etch-and-rinse mode at the dentin margin. For the no-radiotherapy group, the adhesive defects at the dentin margin were significantly higher than at the enamel margin with the application of the etch-and-rinse mode.
本实验室研究旨在通过微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估颈缘区 II 类近中-远中(MOD)修复体的边缘适应性。比较了两组修复体:1)在用通用粘结剂进行酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式修复前暴露于放射治疗下的修复体;和 2)先前用过通用粘结剂进行酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式修复,随后接受放射治疗的修复体。60 个完整的人磨牙随机按照射状态分为两组:无放射治疗(对照组);放射治疗后修复(放射治疗优先组);修复后放射治疗(修复优先组)。然后根据粘结剂应用类型(酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式)将这三组进一步分为两组,共六组(每组 n=10)。制备标准 II 类 MOD 腔。应用通用粘结剂(Kuraray 的 Clearfil Universal Bond Quick)。用树脂复合材料(Tokuyama 的 Estelite Posterior Quick)修复牙齿。放射治疗方案为 60 灰度(Gy),每天 2 Gy,每周 5 天,持续 6 周。在远端和近端视图下分析粘结剂缺陷,并使用 micro-CT(比利时安特卫普的 SkyScan 1174v2)根据腔壁和修复材料之间的黑色空间体积(mm3)进行评估。使用 Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney U 和 Wilcoxon 检验(p<0.05)分析数据。放射治疗方案不影响颈缘区通用粘结剂的边缘适应性。关于应用模式,对于放射治疗优先组,自酸蚀模式在牙本质边缘处引起的粘结剂缺陷明显高于酸蚀-冲洗模式。对于无放射治疗组,在用酸蚀-冲洗模式时,牙本质边缘处的粘结剂缺陷明显高于牙釉质边缘处。