• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据专门的心脏病学单元中心力衰竭患者的射血分数评估其临床特征和死亡原因。

Clinical profile and causes of death according to ejection fraction in patients with heart failure cared for in a specialized Cardiology unit.

机构信息

Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.

Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2022 Mar;222(3):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.rceng.2020.11.005
PMID:35227424
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with heart failure are classified into three phenotypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction. This work aimed to compare the clinical profile, treatment, prognosis, and causes of death of patients with heart failure and reduced (<40%, HF-rEF), preserved (≥50%, HF-pEF), or mid-range (40-49%, HF-mrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction.

METHODS

An analysis was conducted on the clinical data included in a prospective registry of patients with heart failure who were referred to a specific Cardiology unit from 2010 to 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 1404 patients with HF-rEF, 239 patients with HF-mrEF, and 266 patients with HF-pEF were analyzed. Significant differences were observed among the groups in regard to several clinical characteristics and the frequency of prescription of neurohormonal blocking drugs. A multivariate Cox regression revealed an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HF-pEF (hazard ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.80; p = 0.028) and patients with HF-mrEF (hazard ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.78; p = 0.029) as compared to patients with HF-rEF. Heart failure was the most frequent cause of death in the three subgroups. A higher relative weight of sudden death as a cause of death was observed among patients with HF-rEF while the relative weight of non-cardiovascular causes of death was higher among patients with HF-pEF and HF-mrEF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the existence of significant differences among patients with HF-rEF, HF-mrEF, and HF-pEF with regard to their clinical profile, therapeutic management, prognosis, and causes of death.

摘要

背景和目的

根据左心室射血分数,心力衰竭患者可分为三种表型。本研究旨在比较左心室射血分数降低(<40%,HF-rEF)、保留(≥50%,HF-pEF)或中间范围(40-49%,HF-mrEF)的心力衰竭患者的临床特征、治疗、预后和死亡原因。

方法

对 2010 年至 2019 年期间被转诊至特定心脏病学单位的心力衰竭患者前瞻性登记的临床数据进行了分析。

结果

共分析了 1404 例 HF-rEF 患者、239 例 HF-mrEF 患者和 266 例 HF-pEF 患者。各组在多个临床特征和神经激素阻断药物的处方频率方面存在显著差异。多变量 Cox 回归显示 HF-pEF(危险比 1.36;95%置信区间 1.03-1.80;p=0.028)和 HF-mrEF(危险比 1.36;95%置信区间 1.03-1.78;p=0.029)患者的全因死亡率风险增加。心力衰竭是三个亚组中最常见的死亡原因。HF-rEF 患者死亡的相对突发性更高,而 HF-pEF 和 HF-mrEF 患者非心血管原因死亡的相对权重更高。

结论

本研究证实 HF-rEF、HF-mrEF 和 HF-pEF 患者在临床特征、治疗管理、预后和死亡原因方面存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Clinical profile and causes of death according to ejection fraction in patients with heart failure cared for in a specialized Cardiology unit.根据专门的心脏病学单元中心力衰竭患者的射血分数评估其临床特征和死亡原因。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2022 Mar;222(3):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2020.11.005. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Causes of death in hospitalized patients in internal medicine departments with heart failure according to ejection fraction. RICA registry.根据射血分数的不同,心内科住院心力衰竭患者的死亡原因。RICA 登记研究。
Med Clin (Barc). 2022 Jan 7;158(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.10.022. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
In-hospital and long-term prognoses of patients with a mid-range ejection fraction after an ST-segment myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后中等射血分数患者的院内及长期预后
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Aug;74(4):351-358. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1501140. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Various Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后不同左心室射血分数的心源性休克患者的发病率、临床特征及短期预后
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 15;167:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.11.040. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
5
Evaluation of acute myocardial infarction patients with mid-range ejection fraction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.评估急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数处于中间范围的急性心肌梗死患者。
Postgrad Med J. 2019 Jul;95(1125):355-360. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136334. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
Temporal changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and their prognostic impacts in patients with Stage B heart failure.B 期心力衰竭患者左心室射血分数的时间变化及其预后影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 May 1;306:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Results from the RICA Registry.射血分数保留的心力衰竭的流行病学:来自 RICA 登记处的结果。
Med Clin (Barc). 2021 Jul 9;157(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.05.059. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Influence of renal dysfunction phenotype on mortality in decompensated heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fraction.肾功能不全表型对射血分数保留及射血分数中度降低的失代偿性心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 May 12.
9
Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.左心室射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者左心室射血分数变化的预后影响
Open Heart. 2020 Apr 5;7(1):e001112. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001112. eCollection 2020.
10
Prognostic Implications of Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室射血分数中等范围的预后意义
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 27.