• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髂内动脉迂曲对髂内分支手术结局的影响。

Effect of iliac tortuosity on outcomes after iliac branch procedures.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):714-723.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.142. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.142
PMID:35227802
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report a two-centers evaluation of the effects of iliac axis tortuosity on iliac branch device (IBD) results.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2021, all IBD procedures performed at two European centers were analyzed retrospectively. The preoperative pelvic tortuosity index (PTI), external tortuosity index (ETI), and double iliac sign (DIS) were assessed for each iliac axis submitted to IBD. The primary endpoints were technical success, early and mid-term IBD complications (occlusion, stenosis, endoleaks [ELs]) and reinterventions, and the association with the PTI, ETI, and DIS. The 30-day mortality, survival, freedom from complications and freedom from reinterventions (FFR) were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

During the study period, 224 patients had undergone 256 IBD procedures for 165 (64.5%) aortoiliac aneurysms, 44 (17.2%) isolated iliac aneurysms, 11 (4.3%) abdominal aortic aneurysms with a short iliac landing zone, and 36 (14.1%) type Ib ELs. IBD was planned with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for 158 (61.7%), fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for 45 (7.6%), and isolated for 53 (20.7%) cases. Technical success and 30-day mortality were 99.2% (254 of 256) and 0.9% (2 of 224), respectively. A PTI >1.4, an ETI >1.7, and the DIS were tested to identify the risk factors for the endpoints. No ELs and 9 (3.5%) IBD occlusions, requiring five reinterventions (2%), had occurred within 30 days. No association with the PTI, ETI, or DIS was identified; IBD oversizing of ≥25% on the external iliac artery was independently related to occlusion (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-18.1; P = .045). The mean follow-up was 31 ± 27 months, with 11 IBD occlusions, 14 ELs, and 21 reinterventions. At 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up survival, IBD patency, and FFR were 95%, 89%, and 80%; 93%, 91%, and 90%; and 93%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The risk factors for overall complications (n = 34; 13.3%) and reinterventions (n = 26; 10.2%) were an ETI >1.7 (P = .037 and P = .019), a PTI >1.4 (P = .016 and P = .012), and a type Ib EL as the indication (P = .025 and P = .001), respectively. Cox regression confirmed PTI >1.4 as an independent predictor of overall complications and reinterventions (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = .018; and HR, 3 95% CI, 1.3-6.8; P = .018, respectively) and ETI >1.7 as an independent risk factor for ELs (HR 6; 95% CI, 2.1-17.5; P = .001). The freedom from complications and FFR were significantly lower with a PTI >1.4 at 3 years (73% vs 92% [log-rank P = .01] and 77% vs 93% [log-rank P = .001], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found IBDs to be safe and effective in the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms. Early complications are uncommon and related to endograft oversizing rather than anatomic characteristics in the present study. Iliac tortuosity is a risk factor for overall complications and reinterventions, in particular for IBD-related ELs.

摘要

目的

报告 2 个中心关于髂内动脉迂曲对髂分支装置(IBD)结果影响的评估结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2015 年至 2021 年期间在 2 个欧洲中心进行的所有 IBD 手术。对每个接受 IBD 的髂内动脉进行术前骨盆扭曲指数(PTI)、外扭曲指数(ETI)和双髂标志(DIS)评估。主要终点是技术成功率、早期和中期 IBD 并发症(闭塞、狭窄、内漏[ELs])和再干预,以及与 PTI、ETI 和 DIS 的关系。30 天死亡率、生存率、无并发症和无再干预(FFR)是次要终点。

结果

在研究期间,224 例患者接受了 256 例 IBD 手术,其中 165 例(64.5%)为腹主动脉瘤,44 例(17.2%)为孤立性髂动脉瘤,11 例(4.3%)为短髂支落地区腹主动脉瘤,36 例(14.1%)为 Ib 型 ELs。158 例(61.7%)计划行血管内腹主动脉瘤修复,45 例(7.6%)行开窗/分支血管内腹主动脉瘤修复,53 例(20.7%)行孤立性治疗。技术成功率和 30 天死亡率分别为 99.2%(254 例中的 254 例)和 0.9%(224 例中的 2 例)。PTI>1.4、ETI>1.7 和 DIS 用于确定终点的危险因素。30 天内无 ELs 和 9 例(3.5%)IBD 闭塞,需要 5 例再干预(2%)。PTI、ETI 或 DIS 均与闭塞无关,而髂外动脉的 IBD 过度扩张≥25% 与闭塞独立相关(比值比,4.3;95%置信区间[CI],1-18.1;P=.045)。平均随访时间为 31±27 个月,随访期间发生 11 例 IBD 闭塞、14 例 ELs 和 21 例再干预。1、3 和 5 年的随访生存率、IBD 通畅率和 FFR 分别为 95%、89%和 80%、93%、91%和 90%、93%、89%和 83%。总体并发症(n=34;13.3%)和再干预(n=26;10.2%)的危险因素是 ETI>1.7(P=.037 和 P=.019)、PTI>1.4(P=.016 和 P=.012)和 Ib 型 EL 为适应证(P=.025 和 P=.001)。Cox 回归证实 PTI>1.4 是总体并发症和再干预的独立预测因素(危险比[HR],2.3;95%CI,1.1-4.4;P=.018;和 HR,3.95%CI,1.3-6.8;P=.018),ETI>1.7 是 ELs 的独立危险因素(HR 6;95%CI,2.1-17.5;P=.001)。PTI>1.4 时,3 年时的并发症和 FFR 显著降低(73% vs 92%[对数秩 P=.01]和 77% vs 93%[对数秩 P=.001])。

结论

我们发现 IBD 在治疗腹主动脉瘤方面是安全有效的。早期并发症罕见,与本研究中支架内过度扩张有关,而与解剖特征无关。髂内动脉迂曲是总体并发症和再干预的危险因素,特别是与 IBD 相关的 ELs。

相似文献

1
Effect of iliac tortuosity on outcomes after iliac branch procedures.髂内动脉迂曲对髂内分支手术结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):714-723.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.142. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Late outcomes of different hypogastric stent grafts in aortoiliac endografting with iliac branch device: Results from the pELVIS Registry.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中使用髂分支装置的不同下腹腔支架移植物的晚期结果:pELVIS 登记处的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;72(2):549-555.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.065. Epub 2019 Dec 25.
3
Iliac Branch Devices in the Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: A Multicenter Study.髂支腔内修复装置在破裂性腹主动脉瘤中的应用:一项多中心研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):995-1004. doi: 10.1177/15266028221149922. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
4
Secondary Procedures Following Iliac Branch Device Treatment of Aneurysms Involving the Iliac Bifurcation: The pELVIS Registry.髂分支装置治疗累及髂总动脉分叉部动脉瘤后的二次手术:pELVIS注册研究
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;24(3):405-410. doi: 10.1177/1526602817705134. Epub 2017 May 16.
5
The Use of Iliac Branched Devices in the Acute Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Aortoiliac Aneurysms.髂支型器械在破裂性主髂动脉瘤急性血管腔内修复中的应用
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable stent graft for endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms using iliac branch endoprosthesis.使用髂支型血管内修复装置对髂动脉瘤进行血管内修复时,球囊扩张式与自膨式支架型人工血管的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1616-1623.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Use of Secondary Iliac Branch Devices after Previous Endovascular Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.先前接受过腹主动脉和胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后使用次髂分支装置。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.033. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Initial Experience with the E-liac Iliac Branch Device for the Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aorto-iliac Aneurysm.用于腹主动脉瘤腔内修复的E-liac髂支装置的初步经验。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 May;41(5):683-691. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1868-x. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
9
Endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysmal disease with the helical iliac bifurcation device and the bifurcated-bifurcated iliac bifurcation device.采用螺旋型髂分叉装置和分叉型分叉型髂分叉装置进行腹主动脉瘤的腔内修复。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;58(4):861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.033. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
10
Iliac tortuosity increases reinterventions but not adverse outcomes following repair of juxtarenal aneurysms using physician-modified endografts.使用医生改良型腔内移植物修复近肾动脉瘤后,髂动脉迂曲会增加再次干预的次数,但不会增加不良后果的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.053. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Image-based assessment of aortoiliac aneurysm anatomical characteristics in patients from the global iliac branch study.基于影像的全球髂动脉分支研究患者腹主动脉瘤解剖特征评估。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 23;409(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03326-8.
2
Effect of Sex, Age, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Aortoiliac Segment Geometry.性别、年龄和心血管危险因素对主髂动脉段几何形态的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 15;13(6):1705. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061705.