Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK.
Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114826. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114826. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
Global debates about vaccines as a key element of pandemic response and future preparedness in the era of Covid-19 currently focus on questions of supply, with attention to global injustice in vaccine distribution and African countries as rightful beneficiaries of international de-regulation and financing initiatives such as COVAX. At the same time, vaccine demand and uptake are seen to be threatened by hesitancy, often attributed to an increasingly globalised anti-vaxx movement and its propagation of misinformation and conspiracy, now reaching African populations through a social media 'infodemic'. Underplayed in these debates are the socio-political contexts through which vaccine technologies enter and are interpreted within African settings, and the crucial intersections between supply and demand. We explore these through a 'vaccine anxieties' framework attending to both desires for and worries about vaccines, as shaped by bodily, societal and wider political understandings and experiences. This provides an analytical lens to organise and interpret ethnographic and narrative accounts in local and national settings in Uganda and Sierra Leone, and their (dis)connections with global debates and geopolitics. In considering the socially-embedded reasons why people want or do not want Covid-19 vaccines, and how this intersects with the dynamics of vaccine supply, access and distribution in rapidly-unfolding epidemic situations, we bring new, expanded insights into debates about vaccine confidence and vaccine preparedness.
在新冠疫情时代,有关疫苗作为大流行应对和未来防范关键要素的全球辩论目前集中在供应问题上,关注疫苗分配方面的全球不公平现象,以及非洲国家作为国际放宽监管和融资倡议(如 COVAX)的合理受益者的地位。与此同时,疫苗的需求和接种率受到犹豫的威胁,而这种犹豫往往归因于日益全球化的反疫苗运动及其传播的错误信息和阴谋论,这些现在通过社交媒体的“信息疫情”传播到非洲民众中。在这些辩论中,被淡化的是疫苗技术在非洲背景下进入和被解释的社会政治背景,以及供应和需求之间的关键交叉点。我们通过关注疫苗的渴望和担忧这两个方面来探讨“疫苗焦虑”框架,这两个方面受到身体、社会和更广泛的政治理解和经验的影响。这为组织和解释乌干达和塞拉利昂当地和国家背景下的民族志和叙述性描述提供了一个分析视角,并探讨了它们与全球辩论和地缘政治的(脱节)联系。在考虑人们想要或不想要新冠疫苗的原因以及这如何与快速演变的疫情中疫苗供应、获取和分配的动态相互交织时,我们为有关疫苗信心和疫苗准备的辩论提供了新的、扩展的见解。