Grant Catherine
Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8627. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8627. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
Engebretsen and Baker's conceptual paper "" advocates for the adoption of narrative preparedness in addition to health preparedness, emphasising the importance of engaging with people's stories and values during health emergencies. This ensures that policy-makers and health authorities gain the trust of communities as there is evidence this leads to improved outcomes. Their key argument is that science cannot be used effectively in policy unless it makes sense to people and is presented in a way that resonates with their values. This commentary draws on the wider literature and some key examples showing the wisdom of this approach. However, it also suggests that to be successful in integrating narrative preparedness in policy we need to look beyond working with health authorities and use a more transdisciplinary approach as well as addressing both the process and normative challenges in its adoption.
恩格布雷森和贝克的概念性论文主张,除了健康准备之外,还应采用叙事准备,强调在健康紧急情况期间关注人们的故事和价值观的重要性。这确保了政策制定者和卫生当局获得社区的信任,因为有证据表明这会带来更好的结果。他们的主要论点是,除非科学对人们有意义并以与他们的价值观产生共鸣的方式呈现,否则它无法有效地用于政策制定。本评论借鉴了更广泛的文献和一些关键例子,展示了这种方法的智慧。然而,它也表明,要成功地将叙事准备纳入政策,我们需要超越与卫生当局合作的范畴,采用更具跨学科性的方法,并应对其采用过程中的流程和规范性挑战。