Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07270-9.
Encoding often occurs in social contexts, yet research has hardly addressed their role in verbal memory. In three experiments, we investigated the behavioral and neural effects of encoding context on memory for positive, negative, and neutral adjectives, contrasting a social-feedback group (N = 24) with an explicit verbal-learning (N = 24) and a levels-of-processing group (N = 24). Participants in the social-feedback group were not aware of a recognition session one week later, but their memory was better than the explicit learning or the levels-of-processing groups'. However, they also exhibited the strongest response bias, particularly for positive words. Brain event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed largest early negativities (EPN) and late positivities (LPP) in the social-feedback group. Only in the subsequent slow-wave did the explicit learning group show higher amplitudes than the other two groups, suggesting reliance on strategic rather than automatic processes. Still, context-driven incidental encoding outweighed explicit instructions, specifying a decisive role of social factors in memory.
编码通常发生在社会环境中,但研究几乎没有涉及它们在言语记忆中的作用。在三个实验中,我们研究了编码环境对积极、消极和中性形容词记忆的行为和神经影响,将社会反馈组(N=24)与明确的言语学习组(N=24)和加工水平组(N=24)进行对比。社会反馈组的参与者不知道一周后的识别测试,但他们的记忆比明确的学习或加工水平组好。然而,他们也表现出最强的反应偏差,特别是对积极的词。脑事件相关电位(ERP)显示社会反馈组的早期负波(EPN)和晚期正波(LPP)最大。只有在随后的慢波中,明确学习组的振幅才高于其他两组,表明对策略而非自动过程的依赖。尽管如此,语境驱动的偶然编码还是超过了明确的指导,这表明社会因素在记忆中起着决定性的作用。