Chiu Thomas K F
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Educ Technol Res Dev. 2022;70(3):931-949. doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10096-x. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Teacher technology integration research on persistence is needed. Teachers' persistence is strongly associated with their autonomous motivation, as defined by self-determination theory (SDT); however, most SDT-based studies have focused on teachers' support and students' motivation and well-being. SDT founders also recently suggested that future studies should include teacher motivation towards the use of technology. Accordingly, this experimental and longitudinal study aimed to investigate how the proposed support encouraged and sustained the low- and high- quality teachers' integration practices. It proposed a school learning support intervention with three dimensions-leader, expert, and peer support-to meet teachers' basic needs and thereby increase their motivation for and persistence in classroom technology integration. It had a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, involved 122 school teachers and lasted for 22 months. Pre-, post- and delay- questionnaires and two arounds of interviews were used to collect the teachers perceptions on needs satisfaction and technology integration practices. The results suggest that the support increased the extent to which the teachers' needs were met, resulting in more high-quality (student-centered) but not low-quality (lecturing) integration practices. However, the intervention sustained both types of integration practices. The findings offer three major empirical implications, makes two theoretical contributions, and offers four practical suggestions for researchers and practitioners.
需要开展关于教师技术整合持续性的研究。教师的持续性与他们的自主动机密切相关,这是自我决定理论(SDT)所定义的;然而,大多数基于自我决定理论的研究都集中在教师的支持以及学生的动机和幸福感上。自我决定理论的创始人最近还建议,未来的研究应该包括教师对技术使用的动机。因此,这项实验性的纵向研究旨在调查所提出的支持如何鼓励和维持低质量和高质量教师的整合实践。它提出了一种具有领导者、专家和同伴支持三个维度的学校学习支持干预措施,以满足教师的基本需求,从而增强他们在课堂技术整合方面的动机和持续性。它采用了顺序解释性混合方法设计,涉及122名学校教师,持续了22个月。通过前测、后测和延迟问卷以及两轮访谈来收集教师对需求满足和技术整合实践的看法。结果表明,这种支持提高了教师需求得到满足的程度,从而带来了更多高质量(以学生为中心)而非低质量(讲授式)的整合实践。然而,该干预措施维持了这两种整合实践。这些发现提供了三个主要的实证意义,做出了两个理论贡献,并为研究人员和从业者提供了四条实践建议。