School of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan, 030031, China.
Institute for the World Economy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai, 200235, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(33):50238-50255. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19453-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
To ensure the realization of carbon neutrality and emission peak, the Chinese government promulgated the pilot policy for an emissions trading scheme (ETS) in 2011 and gradually expanded the range of the pilot program. However, it has not been systematically studied whether this policy can achieve double dividend and its transmission mechanism. Based on the Porter hypothesis, this paper explores the impacts of an ETS on macro emission reduction and microeconomic performance, verifies the influence of an ETS on double dividend, and analyzes its transmission mechanism using a difference in difference (DID) model and mediation model. The results indicate that an ETS can reduce CO emissions and remarkably improve the economic performance of the enterprises in the areas it is enacted. A double dividend has been realized, which verifies Porter's hypothesis. The mechanism test shows that from the macro perspective, the emission reduction effect of an ETS is mainly achieved by adjusting the energy structure and through local government regulations. In contrast, the mediation effect on the industrial structure is not apparent. From a micro perspective, an ETS mainly affects the economic situation of enterprises through cash flow and technological innovation. Moreover, the transmission effect of enterprises' low-carbon behavior is not apparent. Heterogeneity analysis shows that compared with Midwestern China, an ETS could reduce emissions by adjusting the energy structure in Eastern China. Also, compared with state-owned or large enterprises, an ETS helps improve the economic performance of small or non-state-owned enterprises through technological innovation. This paper provides empirical evidence from macro- and microperspective for evaluating an ETS, conducive to improving the top-level framework of China's future carbon market operation.
为了实现碳达峰碳中和目标,中国政府于 2011 年颁布了碳排放交易试点政策,并逐步扩大试点范围。然而,该政策是否能实现双重红利及其作用机制尚未得到系统研究。基于波特假说,本文利用倍差法(DID)模型和中介效应模型,从宏观减排和微观经济绩效两个层面实证检验了碳排放交易政策对双重红利的影响,并分析了其作用机制。研究结果表明,碳排放交易政策能够降低 CO2 排放,显著提升试点地区企业的经济绩效,实现了双重红利,验证了波特假说。机制检验表明,从宏观层面看,碳排放交易政策的减排效应主要通过能源结构调整和地方政府规制发挥作用,对产业结构的调节效应不明显;从微观层面看,碳排放交易政策主要通过现金流和技术创新两条渠道影响企业的经济绩效,企业低碳行为的传导效应不明显。异质性分析表明,与中西部地区相比,东部地区通过能源结构调整实现了碳排放交易政策的减排效果,与国有企业或大型企业相比,碳排放交易政策通过技术创新提升了小型企业或非国有企业的经济绩效。本文从宏观和微观视角为评价碳排放交易政策提供了经验证据,有助于完善中国未来碳市场运行的顶层设计。