School of nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of emergency, School of nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):1014-1024. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16241. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence of PVC-related complications between catheterisation in the forearm and back of the hand in adult patients.
A peripheral intravenous catheter (PVC) is often inserted as part of care during patients' hospitalisation. The catheter is typically inserted in the forearm or at the back of the hand in usual practice. Studies have not yet reached a consensus on the optimal insertion site in any clinical setting.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines.
We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CINAHL. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies from inception to July 2021 reporting the incidence of PVC-related complications at the forearm and back of the hand were included. Fixed-effects models and random-effects models were used to derive the pooled risk ratios.
Twenty-four studies involving 16562 PVCs met our inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that compared with PVC placement in the back of the hand, placement in the forearm was associated with a higher incidence of total complications and infiltration/extravasation. However, the differences between the PVC indwelling sites were not significant (total complications: P = 0.43; phlebitis: P = 0.35; infiltration/extravasation: P = 0.51). Both incidence of total complications and infiltration/extravasation analyses showed high heterogeneity (total complications: I = 60%; infiltration/extravasation: I = 58%).
Available evidence suggests that there is no significant difference between PVC placement in the forearm and at the back of the hand in terms of the incidence of complications, thus making both approaches suitable.
For patients who need indwelling PVC, medical staff can choose the best indwelling site, and both forearm and back of the hand are suitable.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较成人患者前臂和手背置管时与 PVC 相关并发症的发生率。
在患者住院期间,通常会插入外周静脉导管(PVC)作为护理的一部分。在常规实践中,导管通常插入前臂或手背。在任何临床环境下,研究尚未就最佳插入部位达成共识。
我们根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们搜索了以下电子数据库:PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 CINAHL。纳入了从开始到 2021 年 7 月报告前臂和手背 PVC 相关并发症发生率的随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型得出汇总风险比。
24 项研究涉及 16562 例 PVC 符合我们的纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与手背 PVC 放置相比,前臂放置与总并发症和渗透/外渗的发生率更高。然而,PVC 留置部位之间的差异无统计学意义(总并发症:P=0.43;静脉炎:P=0.35;渗透/外渗:P=0.51)。总并发症和渗透/外渗发生率分析均显示出高度异质性(总并发症:I²=60%;渗透/外渗:I²=58%)。
现有证据表明,在并发症发生率方面,前臂和手背置管之间没有显著差异,因此两种方法都是可行的。
对于需要留置 PVC 的患者,医务人员可以选择最佳的留置部位,前臂和手背都适用。