Suppr超能文献

用于确定基于 EPOS 指南的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎疾病控制的个体症状视觉模拟量表严重程度评分。

Individual symptom visual analogue scale severity scores for determining EPOS guideline-based chronic rhinosinusitis disease control.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Rhinology. 2022 Jun 1;60(3):229-235. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.446.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine how to translate visual analogue scale (VAS) symptom scores to the binary, descriptive symptom scales used in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control.

METHODS

309 CRS patients were recruited. All patients rated their burden of 5 symptoms (nasal blockage, rhinorrhea/postnasal drip, facial pain/pressure, smell loss, sleep disturbance or fatigue) using the binary EPOS descriptive symptom scales and a VAS (on a scale of 0 to 10). In addition, participants completed a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and rated their overall CRS disease control as "controlled", "partly controlled" or "uncontrolled" Results: Symptom burdens measured by VAS, binary descriptive EPOS scale and SNOT-22 were associated with worsening CRS disease control reported by participants. Each symptom had a distinct VAS score cut-off that strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale. However, the predictive ability of VAS for rhinorrhea/ postnasal drip was disparately worse than the other 4 symptoms. When considering all symptom data simultaneously, a VAS score higher than 3.5 strongly predicted the uncontrolled option on the corresponding binary descriptive EPOS symptom scale for all 5 symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

A VAS symptom score of higher than 3.5 translates to the uncontrolled option in the binary, descriptive symptom scale of the EPOS control criteria. The rhinorrhea/postnasal drip descriptive symptom scale translates disparately worse to VAS scores and may be considered for revision in future criteria.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定如何将视觉模拟量表(VAS)症状评分转换为欧洲鼻窦炎和鼻息肉意见书(EPOS)慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)疾病控制标准中使用的二进制描述性症状量表。

方法

招募了 309 名 CRS 患者。所有患者均使用二进制 EPOS 描述性症状量表和 VAS(0 至 10 分)对 5 种症状(鼻塞、流涕/后鼻滴注、面部疼痛/压痛、嗅觉丧失、睡眠障碍或疲劳)的负担进行评分。此外,参与者还完成了 22 项鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22),并将其整体 CRS 疾病控制情况评为“控制”、“部分控制”或“未控制”。

结果

VAS、二进制描述性 EPOS 量表和 SNOT-22 测量的症状负担与参与者报告的 CRS 疾病控制恶化相关。每个症状都有一个明确的 VAS 评分临界点,强烈预测相应的二进制描述性 EPOS 症状量表上的“未控制”选项。然而,VAS 对流涕/后鼻滴注的预测能力明显不如其他 4 种症状。当同时考虑所有症状数据时,VAS 评分高于 3.5 强烈预测相应的二进制描述性 EPOS 症状量表上的“未控制”选项,适用于所有 5 种症状。

结论

VAS 症状评分高于 3.5 可转换为 EPOS 控制标准的二进制描述性症状量表中的“未控制”选项。流涕/后鼻滴注描述性症状量表与 VAS 评分的转换差异较大,在未来的标准中可能需要进行修订。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验