• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Operationalization of the concepts of interdisciplinarity: An implication elicitation exercises based on the framework synthesis methodology.跨学科概念的操作化:基于框架综合方法的意蕴引出练习
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:450. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1522_20. eCollection 2021.
2
Future call for policy making to speed up interdisciplinarity between natural and social sciences and humanities in countries such as India.未来呼吁印度等国家的政策制定者加快自然科学、社会科学和人文科学之间的跨学科融合。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 17;7(3):e06484. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06484. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Rethinking interdisciplinarity: Proposing a multilayered model.重新思考跨学科性:提出一个多层次模型。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 10;34:118. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.118. eCollection 2020.
4
Evolution of interdisciplinarity in biodiversity science.生物多样性科学中跨学科性的演变。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul 4;9(12):6744-6755. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5244. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
The progress of interdisciplinarity in invasion science.入侵科学中的跨学科进展。
Ambio. 2017 May;46(4):428-442. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0897-7. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
What does interdisciplinarity look like in practice: Mapping interdisciplinarity and its limits in the environmental sciences.跨学科在实践中是怎样的:描绘环境科学中的跨学科及其局限性
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Feb;67:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
7
[Interdisciplinarity in gerontology: Theoretical problems and practical challenges].[老年医学中的跨学科性:理论问题与实际挑战]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Apr;48(3):220-4. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0873-4. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.跨学科研究的认识论——科学哲学范式的转变
Eur J Philos Sci. 2019;9(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
The Interdisciplinarity of Collaborations in Cognitive Science.认知科学中合作的跨学科性。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;41(5):1412-1418. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12352. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
The Challenge of Interdisciplinarity in Operationalizing the Right to Health.将健康权付诸实施所面临的跨学科挑战。
Health Hum Rights. 2019 Dec;21(2):251-262.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking interdisciplinarity: Proposing a multilayered model.重新思考跨学科性:提出一个多层次模型。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 10;34:118. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.118. eCollection 2020.
2
The condition of interdisciplinary communication among various Educational and Research Departments of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.伊斯法罕医科大学各教育与研究部门之间的跨学科交流状况。
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Jun 5;6:46. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_70_16. eCollection 2017.
3
How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.如何构建可付诸行动的知识库:“最佳匹配”框架综合法在医疗保健改进研究中的作用
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov;24(11):700-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003642. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
A conceptual framework for interdisciplinary curriculum design: a case study in neuroscience.跨学科课程设计的概念框架:神经科学领域的一个案例研究
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2011 Oct 15;10(1):A71-9. Print 2011 Fall.
5
Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process.过程即关键:正义与人权:优先事项设定与公平审议过程。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9):1573-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123182. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
6
Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership.通过协作式领导加强跨学科研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.037.
7
Foundations of interdisciplinarity: a Lonergan perspective.跨学科性的基础:一种隆纳根视角
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s11019-004-2422-6.

跨学科概念的操作化:基于框架综合方法的意蕴引出练习

Operationalization of the concepts of interdisciplinarity: An implication elicitation exercises based on the framework synthesis methodology.

作者信息

Yazdani Shahram, Hajiahmadi Maryam

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Educational Development office of Medical School, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:450. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1522_20. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1522_20
PMID:35233397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8826868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last few centuries, the overspecialization of various sciences under the pretext of benefiting from pure disciplinary knowledge led to alienation among and competition between different fields of science. Such competition has deviated knowledge from its main objective which is to understand and explain the phenomena. The remedy to this dilemma is to address a new approach, introduced to higher education in the late 1950s as "interdisciplinarity." Accordingly, the main purpose of this article is to propose the strategic instances of operationalizing interdisciplinarity as the key requirements to provide a guideline for designing interdisciplinarity activities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present survey was carried out through the framework synthesis method. To codify the instances of operationalizing interdisciplinarity, the main elements and structures of the model were set as the basis of the query for each element and structure; an independent query was carried out in the literature of the study. The correspondence of the discovered instances was once more compared with the conceptual boxes of the primary theoretical model. Ultimately, the taxonomy was concluded through the operational instances based on the primary framework.

RESULTS

A total of 152 strategies were identified as implications of operationalization of 13 layers and 38 sublayers of the multilayer interdisciplinary model.

CONCLUSION

The development of interdisciplinarity in the national higher education system requires several measures to be taken at different levels of a discipline or scientific field of study. Relying on this, which is the main basis of entering into interdisciplinarity activities, the present study suggests and presents strategic instances of interdisciplinarity operationalization.

摘要

背景

在过去几个世纪里,各种学科以从纯粹学科知识中获益为借口过度专业化,导致不同科学领域之间产生疏离和竞争。这种竞争使知识偏离了其主要目标,即理解和解释现象。解决这一困境的方法是采用一种新方法,该方法在20世纪50年代末被引入高等教育,即“跨学科性”。因此,本文的主要目的是提出跨学科性运作的战略实例,作为提供跨学科活动设计指南的关键要求。

材料与方法

本调查通过框架综合法进行。为了编纂跨学科性运作的实例,将模型的主要元素和结构作为每个元素和结构查询的基础;在该研究的文献中进行独立查询。将发现的实例的对应关系再次与原始理论模型的概念框进行比较。最终,通过基于原始框架的运作实例得出分类法。

结果

共确定了152项策略,作为多层跨学科模型13个层次和38个子层次运作的影响。

结论

国家高等教育系统中跨学科性的发展需要在学科或科学研究领域的不同层面采取若干措施。基于此,这是开展跨学科活动的主要基础,本研究提出并呈现了跨学科性运作的战略实例。