• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的四次基于法国鞘管的经桡动脉脑血管造影:一位神经介入专家的经验。

Four French sheath-based transradial cerebral angiographies in the elderly: A single neurointerventionalist's experience.

作者信息

Choi Dae Han, Yoo Chan Jong, Park Cheol Wan, Kim Myeong Jin

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;29(3):229-234. doi: 10.1177/15910199221083102. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1177/15910199221083102
PMID:35234062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10369113/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter angiography via transradial access (TRA) is better at reducing access site complications and morbidity than via transfemoral access (TFA). The rate of periprocedural complications increases in elderly populations and using a smaller sheath can help reduce access site complications. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of 4 F sheath-based TRA cerebral angiography in elderly patients (≥65 years) and compare it to TFA cerebral angiography.

METHODS

The medical records of elderly patients undergoing diagnostic cerebral angiography with a single neurointerventionalist via TRA (57 cases, from July 2019 to December 2020) versus TFA (69 cases, from January 2018 to June 2019) were retrospectively reviewed. All TRA angiographies were performed via right radial artery access with a 4 F sheath and a 4 F Simmons 2 catheter.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences (TRA vs. TFA) in age (71.1 ± 4.0 vs. 72.1 ± 4.6 years, p = 0.189), accessed vessels (3.9 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.6, p = 0.852), fluoroscopy time (7.1 ± 3.3 vs. 7.6 ± 3.5 min, p = 0.068), and radiation exposure (42.1 ± 15.8 vs. 47.0 ± 13.7 Gy-cm, p = 0.067). However, the procedure duration was significantly shorter in the TRA group (17.2 ± 3.9 vs. 19.0 ± 6.0 min, p = 0.003). Painful groin hematoma occurred in 2 of the 69 cases (2.9%) in the TFA group. In the TRA group, access site complications were not occurred; however, catheter kinks occurred in 2 of 57 cases (3.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 4 F sheath-based TRA is a feasible option for diagnostic cerebral angiography in elderly patients. However, care should be taken during catheter manipulation.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉入路(TRA)行导管血管造影术在减少穿刺部位并发症和发病率方面优于经股动脉入路(TFA)。老年人群围手术期并发症发生率增加,使用较小的鞘管有助于减少穿刺部位并发症。本研究的目的是评估基于4F鞘管的TRA脑血管造影术在老年患者(≥65岁)中的可行性和安全性,并将其与TFA脑血管造影术进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2019年7月至2020年12月期间由单一神经介入医生经TRA行诊断性脑血管造影术的老年患者(57例)与2018年1月至2019年6月期间经TFA行诊断性脑血管造影术的老年患者(69例)的病历。所有TRA血管造影术均通过右桡动脉入路,使用4F鞘管和4F Simmons 2导管进行。

结果

年龄(71.1±4.0岁 vs. 72.1±4.6岁,p = 0.189)、穿刺血管数量(3.9±0.5 vs. 3.9±0.6,p = 0.852)、透视时间(7.1±3.3 vs. 7.6±3.5分钟,p = 0.068)和辐射暴露量(42.1±15.8 vs. 47.0±13.7 Gy-cm,p = 0.067)在TRA组和TFA组之间无显著差异。然而,TRA组的手术时间明显更短(17.2±3.9 vs. 19.0±6.0分钟,p = 0.003)。TFA组69例中有2例(2.9%)发生腹股沟疼痛性血肿。在TRA组中,未发生穿刺部位并发症;然而,57例中有2例(3.5%)发生导管扭曲。

结论

基于4F鞘管的TRA是老年患者诊断性脑血管造影术的一种可行选择。然而,在导管操作过程中应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Four French sheath-based transradial cerebral angiographies in the elderly: A single neurointerventionalist's experience.老年患者的四次基于法国鞘管的经桡动脉脑血管造影:一位神经介入专家的经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;29(3):229-234. doi: 10.1177/15910199221083102. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
2
Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study.经桡动脉入路在老年患者诊断性全脑血管造影中的应用:一项对比观察性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1235-1241. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016140. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
Comparison of Transradial Access and Transfemoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly Population.老年人群诊断性脑血管造影经桡动脉通路与经股动脉通路的比较
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:e411-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.071. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis.单中心、随机、对照研究经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管造影的对比:学习曲线分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):717-724. doi: 10.1177/1526602819859285. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.经桡动脉入路的现实情况检查:经桡动脉与经股动脉入路用于腹部和外周介入的单中心比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5580-2. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Comparison of Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography and Transradial Cerebral Angiography Following a Shift in Practice During Four Years at a Single Center in China.在中国一家单中心四年的实践转变后,经股动脉与经桡动脉入路行全脑血管造影的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 25;26:e921631. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921631.
7
Transradial cerebral angiography becomes more efficient than transfemoral angiography: lessons from 500 consecutive angiograms.经桡动脉脑血管造影术比经股动脉脑血管造影术更高效:500 例连续造影术的经验教训。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Apr;14(4):397-402. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017391. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Transradial versus transfemoral arterial approach for cerebral angiography and the frequency of embolic events on diffusion weighted MRI.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管造影及磁共振弥散加权成像显示栓塞事件的频率比较。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):723-727. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019009. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes.经桡动脉脑血管造影:技术与结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Sep;10(9):874-881. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013584. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
10
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Intraoperative Cerebral Angiography for Open Cerebrovascular Surgery: Effectiveness, Safety, and Learning Curve.经桡动脉与经股动脉术中脑血管造影在开颅脑血管手术中的应用:有效性、安全性和学习曲线。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023 May 1;24(5):476-482. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000567. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Transradial versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and complications.诊断性脑血管造影中经桡动脉与经股动脉入路:临床结局和并发症的全面系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuroradiology. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03581-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study.经桡动脉入路在老年患者诊断性全脑血管造影中的应用:一项对比观察性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1235-1241. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016140. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
2
Access-Site Complications in Transfemoral Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Systematic Review of Incidence Rates and Management Strategies.经股神经血管介入手术的穿刺部位并发症:发病率及管理策略的系统评价
Oper Neurosurg. 2020 Sep 15;19(4):353-363. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa096.
3
Feasibility and safety of transradial access for pediatric neurointerventions.经桡动脉入路用于儿科神经介入的可行性和安全性。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Sep;12(9):893-896. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015835. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
Transradial access for neurointerventions: management of access challenges and complications.经桡动脉入路进行神经介入治疗:入路挑战和并发症的处理。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):82-86. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015145. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Radial Artery Catheterization for Neuroendovascular Procedures.神经介入手术中的桡动脉入路置管。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2587-2590. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
6
A prospective study of the transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral arteriography.经桡动脉入路行诊断性脑动脉造影的前瞻性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Oct;11(10):1045-1049. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014686. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.
8
Reduction of catheter kinks and knots via radial approach.经桡动脉入路减少导管扭结和打结。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1141-1146. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27623. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Transradial access: lessons learned from cardiology.经桡动脉入路:心脏病学的经验教训。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 May;10(5):487-492. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013295. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
Transradial approach for coronary procedures in the elderly population.老年人群冠状动脉介入治疗的桡动脉入路
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):798-806. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.09.002.