• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生与配给制:荣誉制度的终结。

Doctors and rationing: the end of the honor system.

作者信息

Friedman E

出版信息

Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):349-64.

PMID:3523564
Abstract

Physicians have traditionally held that to participate in "rationing" or resource allocation would betray their duty to advocate for everything possible for the patient. However, the record of physician behavior belies that, indicating instead that they have always rationed health care and their own time and services. Physician resistance to calls for "rationing" today appears to be based more on the nature of the process and on the fact that this process is being taken out of the hands of physicians. If American medicine does not rethink its own stance and develop not only a stronger resource allocation ethic but also a means of implementing it, it is unlikely that physicians will continue as the guardians of the quality of care and patient service.

摘要

传统上,医生们一直认为,参与“配给”或资源分配会违背他们为患者尽一切可能争取治疗的职责。然而,医生的行为记录却与此相悖,这表明他们一直在对医疗保健以及自己的时间和服务进行配给。如今,医生对“配给”呼声的抵制似乎更多地基于这一过程的性质,以及该过程正脱离医生掌控这一事实。如果美国医学界不重新思考自身立场,不仅要制定更强有力的资源分配伦理准则,还要找到实施该准则的方法,那么医生们不太可能继续担任医疗质量和患者服务的守护者。

相似文献

1
Doctors and rationing: the end of the honor system.医生与配给制:荣誉制度的终结。
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):349-64.
2
Allocation of scarce resources: a challenge for American medicine.
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):343-8.
3
Allocating health resources ethically: new roles for administrators and clinicians.合乎伦理地分配卫生资源:管理人员和临床医生的新角色
Front Health Serv Manage. 1991 Fall;8(1):3-29, 43-4.
4
The physician as rationer: uncertainty about the physician's role obligations.医生作为分配者:对医生角色义务的不确定性。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):421-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322412. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
5
The ethics of cost-containment: bureaucratic medicine and the doctor as patient-advocate.成本控制的伦理:官僚化医疗与作为患者权益倡导者的医生
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy. 1988 Winter;3(2):187-225.
6
Is there a role for physicians in health and medical resource allocation?医生在健康和医疗资源分配中是否能发挥作用?
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1994 Feb;27(1):12-4.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
Physicians' duties in an era of cost containment: advocacy or betrayal?成本控制时代医生的职责:是拥护还是背叛?
JAMA. 1999 Nov 3;282(17):1675.
9
Doctors, ethics, and managed care.医生、伦理与管理式医疗。
Linacre Q. 1996 Nov;63(4):84-93.
10
Educating physicians about responsible management of finite resources.
JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1115-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.1013.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationing health care and the need for credible scarcity: why Americans can't say no.医疗资源配给与可信的稀缺性需求:为何美国人无法拒绝。
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1439-45. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1439.
2
A systems view of health care for the poor.
J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Feb;81(2):169-78.
3
High-tech medicine and the control of health care costs.高科技医学与医疗保健成本控制
CMAJ. 1989 Apr 15;140(8):905-8.
4
The influence of patient smoking status on therapeutic decisions.患者吸烟状况对治疗决策的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):165-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02598006.