Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern.
School of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundéré.
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2022 Feb;50(1):7-13. doi: 10.1055/a-1697-4946. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
The aim of this study was to analyze antimicrobial usage (AMU) in fattening pig farms that took part in the SuisSano/Safety + Health Programme in Switzerland over the year 2020 and to discuss the potential for further improvement. Usage was examined according to the antimicrobial's class and indication for use, with emphasis on highest priority critically important antimicrobials (HPCIAs).
Data on AMU from 1411 farms, reported in an electronic treatment journal, was used. AMU was quantified through treatment incidence (TI) based on Swiss Defined Daily Doses (DDDch). Indication of use for each antimicrobial class was analyzed with particular focus on HPCIAs.
The total TI of all antimicrobials used in the farms corresponds to 8.9 DDDch per 1000 pig-days at risk, of which HPCIAs represented 2.6 %. A total of 140 farms (9.9 %) partake in HPCIAs usage, with tylosin (73.8 % of total HPCIA TI) and colistin (22.8 % of total HPCIA TI) being the most frequently antimicrobials used. The most common indication for treatment with HPCIAs was gastrointestinal disorders (62.1 % of total HPCIA TI).
This study shows that the efforts made in recent years to foster prudent use of antimicrobials and, especially HPCIAs in Swiss pig production, have been successful. Indeed, 90.1 % (1271 of 1411) of the farms did not use any HPCIAs over the year 2020. Of the recorded treatments, HPCIA's represented only 2.6 % of the total TIs used in fattening pigs. Since many farms do not use any HPCIAs, knowledge can be obtained from these farms to identify practices which can further reduce or even stop HPCIAs usage. Moreover, information concerning indications for HPCIAs usage provide input concerning where treatment options other than HPCIAs should be explored by both farmers and veterinarians.
本研究旨在分析 2020 年参与瑞士 SuisSano/Safety+Health 计划的育肥猪养殖场的抗菌药物使用情况(AMU),并讨论进一步改进的潜力。根据抗菌药物的类别和用途,对使用情况进行了检查,重点是最高优先级的关键抗菌药物(HPCIAs)。
使用来自 1411 个农场的电子治疗记录报告的 AMU 数据。通过基于瑞士定义的每日剂量(DDDch)的治疗发生率(TI)来量化 AMU。对每一类抗菌药物的使用指征进行了分析,特别关注 HPCIAs。
农场使用的所有抗菌药物的总 TI 相当于每 1000 个风险猪日 8.9 DDDch,其中 HPCIAs 占 2.6%。共有 140 个农场(9.9%)参与了 HPCIAs 的使用,其中泰乐菌素(HPCIA TI 的 73.8%)和黏菌素(HPCIA TI 的 22.8%)是使用最频繁的抗菌药物。治疗 HPCIAs 的最常见指征是胃肠道疾病(HPCIA TI 的 62.1%)。
本研究表明,近年来为促进瑞士猪生产中抗菌药物的合理使用,特别是 HPCIAs 的合理使用而做出的努力是成功的。事实上,2020 年 90.1%(1411 个中的 1271 个)的农场没有使用任何 HPCIAs。记录的治疗中,HPCIA 仅占育肥猪使用的总 TI 的 2.6%。由于许多农场不使用任何 HPCIAs,因此可以从这些农场获得知识,以确定可以进一步减少甚至停止使用 HPCIAs 的实践。此外,有关 HPCIAs 使用指征的信息为农民和兽医提供了有关应在何处探索除 HPCIAs 以外的其他治疗选择的信息。