Center of Health Sciences, Campus Jacarezinho, University of North Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, Brazil.
Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (Fmrp/usp), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Aug 3;39(8):1716-1726. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2043964. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
To investigate the intrarater and interrater agreement of a 6-item test battery in nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP) and investigate the agreement between raters to assign the resulting movement control (MC) diagnoses.
Thirty patients with chronic LBP (18-30 years) were included in this study. Six raters were trained and rated the videos of the patients during the execution of the tests. After one week, the raters re-watched the videos and repeated the examination. A diagnosis of MC was assigned for each patient. Agreement was analyzed using weighted kappa and prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) coefficients.
We showed an acceptable intrarater agreement for the 6-item test battery for four out of six raters, except for one test: prone knee flexion. The results of the interrater agreement between the three pairs of raters showed acceptable agreement levels (k > 0.4), except for two tests, "rocking on all four backward" and "prone knee flexion test." For the diagnosis of MC impairment, acceptable agreement levels (k > 0.4) were observed for five out of six raters for intrarater agreement. For interrater assessment, we found an acceptable agreement between pairs of raters.
We showed acceptable levels of agreement between the intrarater and interrater for a 6-item test battery to identify MC impairment, except for two tests. Agreement in the MC diagnoses achieved acceptable levels for five of the six raters (intrarater) and all three pairs of raters (interrater). Such results support the use of the 6-item test battery to detect MC impairment.
探讨非特异性慢性下腰痛(LBP)患者 6 项测试组合的组内和组间一致性,并研究评估者之间在分配运动控制(MC)诊断结果方面的一致性。
本研究纳入了 30 例慢性 LBP(18-30 岁)患者。6 名评估者接受培训并在患者执行测试时对视频进行评估。一周后,评估者重新观看视频并重复检查。为每位患者分配 MC 诊断。使用加权 Kappa 和校正后优势比(PABAK)系数分析一致性。
我们发现,对于 6 项测试组合中的 4 项测试,除了一项测试(俯卧位屈膝)外,4 名评估者的组内一致性可接受;对于 3 对评估者之间的组间一致性,除了两项测试(“所有四肢后倾摆动”和“俯卧位屈膝测试”)外,其余结果均显示出可接受的一致性水平(κ>0.4)。对于 MC 损伤的诊断,5 名评估者的组内一致性可达到可接受水平(κ>0.4)。对于组间评估,我们发现评估者之间的一致性达到了可接受的水平。
我们发现,6 项测试组合在识别 MC 损伤方面具有可接受的组内和组间一致性,除了两项测试外。对于 5 名评估者中的 5 名(组内)和所有 3 对评估者(组间),MC 诊断的一致性达到了可接受的水平。这些结果支持使用 6 项测试组合来检测 MC 损伤。