Suppr超能文献

比较影像学技术测量耳蜗植入患者皮瓣厚度,以实现术前设备选择。

A comparison of imaging techniques to measure skin flap thickness in cochlear implant patients to enable pre-operative device selection.

机构信息

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Cochlear Implants Int. 2022 Jul;23(4):179-188. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2045074. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible cochlear implants have weaker internal magnets than non-MRI-compatible devices. Their suitability for individual patients is limited by skin flap thickness, traditionally measured with a needle in the operating theatre. We aimed to establish the accuracy of imaging modalities to measure skin flap thickness pre-operatively, with the goal of streamlining device selection and simplifying the consent process.

METHODS

Skin flap measurements were taken using ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and MRI and compared for agreement with intra-operative needle measurement.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven skin flaps were included. Absolute agreement between needle and imaging methods was low: needle/US: 44.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7-62.7), needle/CT: 39.1% (95% CI: 22.2-59.2), needle/MRI: 20.8% (95% CI: 9.2-40.5). However, US and CT showed 95.7% agreement (95% CI: 76.0-99.8) with intraclass correlation of 0.996 (95% CI: 0.991-0.998) and narrow Bland-Altman limits of agreement (-0.37, 0.45 mm). BMI and skin flap thickness showed a significant positive correlation (= 0.664, P0.002) but no significant correlation was observed for age (P= 0.659).

DISCUSSION

The high level of agreement between US and CT suggests that there are more accurate measurements of skin flap thickness compared with needle or MRI. Needle measurements are consistently smaller.

CONCLUSION

The use of CT or US should be considered when making pre-operative device choices.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)兼容的人工耳蜗植入物的内部磁铁强度比非 MRI 兼容的设备弱。由于传统上在手术室中使用针测量皮肤瓣厚度,因此它们对个体患者的适用性受到限制。我们旨在确定术前影像学检查测量皮肤瓣厚度的准确性,以期简化设备选择并简化知情同意过程。

方法

使用超声(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和 MRI 测量皮肤瓣厚度,并将其与术中针测量结果进行比较。

结果

共纳入 27 个皮肤瓣。针与影像学方法之间的绝对一致性较低:针/US:44.4%(95%置信区间[CI]:27.7-62.7),针/CT:39.1%(95% CI:22.2-59.2),针/MRI:20.8%(95% CI:9.2-40.5)。然而,US 和 CT 显示出 95.7%的一致性(95% CI:76.0-99.8),组内相关系数为 0.996(95% CI:0.991-0.998),且 Bland-Altman 一致性界限较窄(-0.37,0.45 mm)。BMI 和皮肤瓣厚度呈显著正相关(=0.664,P0.002),但年龄无显著相关性(P=0.659)。

讨论

US 和 CT 之间的高度一致性表明,与针或 MRI 相比,皮肤瓣厚度的测量更为准确。针测量值始终较小。

结论

在进行术前设备选择时,应考虑使用 CT 或 US。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验