• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的冠状动脉入路。

Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 24;18(3):203-212. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00970.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00970
PMID:35236643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9912966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether there are differences in coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between bicuspid and tricuspid anatomy.

AIMS

Our aim was to investigate coronary access after TAVR using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (BAV vs TAV), based on CT simulation.

METHODS

A total of 86 type 0 BAV, 70 type 1 BAV, and 132 TAV patients were included. If the coronary ostium faced the sealed parts of the THV or the tilted-up native leaflet (NL), this was defined as THV- or NL-related challenging coronary access, respectively. If coaxial engagement was not allowed due to interference from the unwrapped frame, THV-related complex coronary access was defined.

RESULTS

The incidence of THV-related challenging coronary access was 21.2% for the left coronary artery (LCA) and 17.7% for the right coronary artery (RCA), and type 0 BAV patients encountered fewer THV-related challenging LCA access than their TAV counterparts (OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89). NL-related challenging coronary access was observed in 3.1% for LCA and 1.4% for RCA, and THV-related complex coronary access was identified in 5.9% for LCA and 17.0% for RCA; however, no significant differences were found among groups. The proportion of optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles suitable for guiding LCA engagement was similar among groups (64.0% vs 70.0% vs 62.1%), but those suitable for guiding RCA engagement were significantly higher in the type 0 BAV group (31.4% vs 4.3% vs 9.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary access may be challenging or complex in a significant proportion of both BAV and TAV patients after TAVR. Type 0 BAV anatomy may be more favourable for post-TAVR coronary access.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后,二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)的冠状动脉入路是否存在差异尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在通过 CT 模拟研究使用自膨式经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)在二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)与三叶式主动脉瓣(TAV)中的 TAVR 后冠状动脉入路。

方法

共纳入 86 例 0 型 BAV、70 例 1 型 BAV 和 132 例 TAV 患者。如果冠状动脉口朝向 THV 的密封部分或倾斜的原生瓣叶(NL),则分别定义为 THV 相关或 NL 相关的挑战性冠状动脉入路。如果由于未包裹的框架干扰而无法同轴接合,则定义为 THV 相关的复杂冠状动脉入路。

结果

左冠状动脉(LCA)THV 相关挑战性入路的发生率为 21.2%,右冠状动脉(RCA)为 17.7%,0 型 BAV 患者的 LCA 与 TAV 患者相比,THV 相关的挑战性 LCA 入路更少(OR 0.42,95%CI:0.20-0.89)。LCA 的 NL 相关挑战性入路发生率为 3.1%,RCA 为 1.4%,LCA 的 THV 相关复杂入路发生率为 5.9%,RCA 为 17.0%;然而,各组之间无显著差异。适合引导 LCA 接合的最佳透视视角比例在各组之间相似(64.0%比 70.0%比 62.1%),但 0 型 BAV 组适合引导 RCA 接合的比例明显更高(31.4%比 4.3%比 9.1%)。

结论

TAVR 后,相当一部分 BAV 和 TAV 患者的冠状动脉入路可能具有挑战性或复杂。0 型 BAV 解剖结构可能更有利于 TAVR 后冠状动脉入路。

相似文献

1
Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的冠状动脉入路。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Jun 24;18(3):203-212. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00970.
2
Risk of Coronary Obstruction During Redo-TAVR in Patients With Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者再次行经导管主动脉瓣置换术时发生冠状动脉阻塞的风险。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):712-724. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.282.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.039. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
4
Definition of trAnscatheter heart Valve orIeNtation in biCuspId aortic valve: The DA VINCI pilot study.经导管心脏瓣膜在二叶式主动脉瓣中的定位定义:达芬奇试点研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 12;9:1056496. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1056496. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9.
6
Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.经胸超声心动图与经食管超声心动图在主动脉瓣疾病诊断中的比较
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1408-1418. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex333.
7
Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.与三尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者相比,经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗的二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室逆向重构不那么明显。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;34(11):1761-1767. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1401-6. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Balloon-Expandable Valve Geometry After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后低危二叶瓣与三叶瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者的球囊扩张瓣几何结构。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Dec;33:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的代谢谱差异。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 May 18;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01491-4.
10
[Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].[二叶式主动脉瓣或三叶式主动脉瓣对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者血流动力学及左心室逆向重构的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 24;50(12):1193-1200. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221104-00865.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural heart disease review of TAVR in low-risk patients: importance of lifetime management.低风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结构性心脏病综述:终身管理的重要性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 1;11:1362791. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1362791. eCollection 2024.
2
Commissural and coronary alignment of the Venus-A valve after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective cross-sectional study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后Venus-A瓣膜的连合与冠状动脉对齐:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Jun 30;13(3):487-495. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-565. Epub 2023 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Specific Implantation Technique to Obtain Neo-Commissural Alignment With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves.患者特异性植入技术实现自膨式经导管主动脉瓣的新交界对位。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2097-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
2
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May 4;77(17):2187-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.014.
3
Double S-Curve Versus Cusp-Overlap Technique: Defining the Optimal Fluoroscopic Projection for TAVR With a Self-Expanding Device.双S曲线与尖峰重叠技术:确定使用自膨胀装置进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的最佳透视投影
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.033.
4
Determination of optimal fluoroscopic angulations for aorto-coronary ostial interventions from coronary computed tomography angiography.从冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术确定冠状动脉口部介入的最佳透视角度。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Jul-Aug;15(4):366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve neo-commissure alignment with the Portico system.经导管主动脉瓣新交界与Portico系统的对齐
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 11;17(2):e152-e155. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01095.
6
Risk of Coronary Obstruction and Feasibility of Coronary Access After Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Self-Expanding Evolut Valve: A Computed Tomography Simulation Study.经皮主动脉瓣置换术后重复使用自膨式 Evolut 瓣膜的冠状动脉阻塞风险和冠状动脉入路的可行性:计算机断层扫描模拟研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;13(12):e009496. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009496. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉口和分支的最佳透视投影由计算机断层冠状动脉造影定义。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 9;13(21):2560-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.042. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Coronary Cannulation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The RE-ACCESS Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的冠状动脉插管:RE-ACCESS 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 9;13(21):2542-2555. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Alignment of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Neo-Commissures (ALIGN TAVR): Impact on Final Valve Orientation and Coronary Artery Overlap.经导管主动脉瓣置换术新交界对准(ALIGN TAVR):对最终瓣叶方位和冠状动脉重叠的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1030-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Feasibility of Coronary Access and Aortic Valve Reintervention in Low-Risk TAVR Patients.低危人群行 TAVR 患者的冠状动脉入路和主动脉瓣再介入的可行性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 23;13(6):726-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.202.