Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌中前哨淋巴结定位与前哨淋巴结定位联合系统性淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项开放标签、非劣效性随机试验(ALICE试验)

Sentinel lymph node mapping versus sentinel lymph node mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial (ALICE trial).

作者信息

Baiocchi Glauco, Andrade Carlos Eduardo Mattos Cunha, Ribeiro Reitan, Moretti-Marques Renato, Tsunoda Audrey Tieko, Alvarenga-Bezerra Vanessa, Lopes Andre, Costa Ronaldo Lúcio Rangel, Kumagai Lillian Yuri, Badiglian-Filho Levon, Faloppa Carlos Chaves, Mantoan Henrique, De Brot Louise, Dos Reis Ricardo, Goncalves Bruna Tirapelli

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil

Gynecology Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 May 3;32(5):676-679. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003378.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence suggest that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial cancer accurately detects lymph node metastasis. However, prospective randomized trials addressing the oncological outcomes of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer without lymphadenectomy are lacking.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to confirm that SLN biopsy without systematic node dissection does not negatively impact oncological outcomes.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that there is no survival benefit in adding systematic lymphadenectomy to sentinel node mapping for endometrial cancer staging. Additionally, we aim to evaluate morbidity and impact in quality of life (QoL) after forgoing systematic lymphadenectomy.

TRIAL DESIGN

This is a collaborative, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial. After total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and SLN biopsy, patients will be randomized (1:1) into: (a) no further lymph node dissection or (b) systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

MAJOR INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria are patients with high-grade histologies (endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma), endometrioid G1 or G2 with imaging concerning for myometrial invasion of ≥50% or cervical invasion, clinically suitable to undergo systematic lymphadenectomy.

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS

The primary objective is to compare 3-year disease-free survival and the secondary objectives are 5-year overall survival, morbidity, incidence of lower limb lymphedema, and QoL after SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.

SAMPLE SIZE

178 participants will be randomized in this study with an estimated date for completing accrual of December 2024 and presenting results in 2027.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03366051.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检能准确检测淋巴结转移。然而,缺乏针对不进行淋巴结清扫的子宫内膜癌SLN活检肿瘤学结局的前瞻性随机试验。

主要目标

本研究旨在证实不进行系统性淋巴结清扫的SLN活检不会对肿瘤学结局产生负面影响。

研究假设

我们假设,对于子宫内膜癌分期,在前哨淋巴结定位基础上增加系统性淋巴结清扫并无生存获益。此外,我们旨在评估放弃系统性淋巴结清扫后的发病率及对生活质量(QoL)的影响。

试验设计

这是一项协作性、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机试验。在全子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术及SLN活检后,患者将被随机(1:1)分为:(a)不再进行淋巴结清扫或(b)系统性盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫。

主要纳入和排除标准

纳入标准为高级别组织学类型(子宫内膜样G3、浆液性、透明细胞和癌肉瘤)的患者,或子宫内膜样G1或G2且影像学提示肌层浸润≥50%或宫颈浸润,临床上适合进行系统性淋巴结清扫。

主要终点

主要目标是比较3年无病生存率,次要目标是比较5年总生存率、发病率、下肢淋巴水肿发生率,以及在高中度和高危子宫内膜癌患者中进行SLN定位±系统性淋巴结清扫后的生活质量。

样本量

本研究将随机纳入178名参与者,预计2024年12月完成入组,并于2027年公布结果。

试验注册号

NCT03366051。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验