Thomas Sherine J, Dash D P
Hematology and Oncology, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Molecular Oncology & Genetics (MOGL), Versiti Wisconsin (Formerly Known as Blood Center Wisconsin), Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Case Rep Hematol. 2022 Feb 21;2022:4579122. doi: 10.1155/2022/4579122. eCollection 2022.
. The diagnosis and prognostication of myeloproliferative neoplasm rely on the presence of driver mutations in JAK2, calreticulin (CALR), and MPL mutations. In the past, the presence of these mutations was thought to be mutually exclusive. Since then, there have been multiple reports of the presence of dual mutations. The presence of all three driver mutations in the same patient with myelofibrosis has not been previously described.
A 73-year-old female underwent a hematological workup in our facility after a routine hemogram performed prior to complex ophthalmological surgery revealed severe thrombocytosis. A comprehensive workup including an NGS panel for MPN driver mutations demonstrated that she had a calreticulin type-1 mutation, a JAK2 exon 14 (JAK2L611S) mutation, and an abnormal hotspot variant for MPL with VAF1%. A bone marrow biopsy confirmed a myeloproliferative neoplasm with grade 2 reticulin fibrosis suggesting primary myelofibrosis. Molecular profiling of bone marrow confirmed the previously noted mutations and an MPLW515R mutation. The patient was started on treatment with hydroxyurea and aspirin with improvement in platelet count and resolution of anemia.
The clinical significance of the presence of multiple driver mutations in the same patient is not well understood at this time. There have been 11 publications between 2014 and 2020 that have described dual mutations of JAK2V617F, MPL, and CALR mutations. The JAK2 exon 14 mutation noted, in this case, is JAK2L611S which has not previously been reported in MPN and only reported in 5 cases in the COSMIC database. The JAK2 exon 14 mutation identified in this case is not an established driver mutation for myeloproliferative neoplasm, and its clinical implication remains unknown.
The above case in addition to recent case reports and case series supports the use of broader NGS sequencing panels for diagnosis and prognostication of MPN. These mutations should not be considered mutually exclusive. The clinical behavior and prognosis of the subgroup with multiple mutations need to be studied in larger series.
骨髓增殖性肿瘤的诊断和预后依赖于JAK2、钙网蛋白(CALR)和MPL突变中驱动突变的存在。过去,人们认为这些突变是相互排斥的。从那时起,已有多篇关于双重突变存在的报道。同一例骨髓纤维化患者中同时存在所有三种驱动突变的情况此前尚未见报道。
一名73岁女性在复杂眼科手术前进行的常规血常规检查显示严重血小板增多症后,在我们机构接受了血液学检查。包括用于MPN驱动突变的NGS检测板在内的全面检查表明,她存在钙网蛋白1型突变、JAK2外显子14(JAK2L611S)突变以及MPL的异常热点变异,变异等位基因频率为1%。骨髓活检证实为骨髓增殖性肿瘤伴2级网状纤维纤维化,提示原发性骨髓纤维化。骨髓的分子分析证实了先前发现的突变以及MPLW515R突变。患者开始接受羟基脲和阿司匹林治疗,血小板计数改善,贫血症状缓解。
目前尚不清楚同一患者中存在多种驱动突变的临床意义。2014年至2020年间有11篇出版物描述了JAK2V617F、MPL和CALR突变的双重突变。本病例中发现的JAK2外显子14突变是JAK2L611S,此前在MPN中未见报道,在COSMIC数据库中仅报道了5例。本病例中鉴定出的JAK2外显子14突变并非骨髓增殖性肿瘤已确定的驱动突变,其临床意义仍不清楚。
上述病例以及近期的病例报告和病例系列支持使用更广泛的NGS测序检测板对MPN进行诊断和预后评估。不应认为这些突变是相互排斥的。需要对更多病例进行研究,以了解具有多种突变的亚组的临床行为和预后。