Suppr超能文献

非手术性种植体周围炎治疗联合或不联合全身用抗生素:一项随机对照临床试验。

Non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment with or without systemic antibiotics: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):548-557. doi: 10.1111/clr.13914. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the adjunctive effect of systemic amoxicillin (AMX) and metronidazole (MTZ) in patients receiving non-surgical treatment (NST) for peri-implantitis (PI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients were randomized into an experimental group treated with NST plus AMX + MTZ (N = 18) and a control group treated with NST alone (N = 19). Clinical parameters were evaluated at 12 weeks post-treatment. The primary outcome was the change in peri-implant pocket depth (PIPD) from baseline to 12 weeks, while secondary outcomes included bleeding on probing (BoP), suppuration on probing (SoP), and plaque. Data analysis was performed at patient level (one target site per patient).

RESULTS

All 37 patients completed the study. Both groups showed a significant PIPD reduction after NST. The antibiotics group showed a higher mean reduction in PIPD at 12 weeks, compared with the control group (2.28 ± 1.49 mm vs. 1.47 ± 1.95 mm), however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant effect of various potential confounders on PIPD reduction. Neither treatment resulted in significant improvements in BoP at follow-up; 30 of 37 (81%) target sites still had BoP after treatment. Only two implants, one in each group, exhibited a successful outcome defined as PIPD < 5 mm, and absence of BoP and SoP.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-surgical treatment was able to reduce PIPD at implants with PI. The adjunctive use of systemic AMX and MTZ did not show statistically significant better results compared to NST alone. NST with or without antibiotics was ineffective to completely resolve inflammation around dental implants.

摘要

目的

评估全身使用阿莫西林(AMX)和甲硝唑(MTZ)辅助治疗对接受非手术治疗(NST)的种植体周围炎(PI)患者的效果。

材料和方法

将 37 名患者随机分为实验组(N=18),采用 NST 联合 AMX+MTZ 治疗;对照组(N=19)仅采用 NST 治疗。治疗后 12 周评估临床参数。主要结局为从基线到 12 周时种植体周袋深度(PIPD)的变化,次要结局包括探诊出血(BoP)、探诊溢脓(SoP)和菌斑。数据分析以患者为单位(每位患者一个目标位点)。

结果

所有 37 名患者均完成研究。两组 NST 后 PIPD 均显著降低。与对照组相比,抗生素组 12 周时 PIPD 的平均降低量更高(2.28±1.49mm 比 1.47±1.95mm),但差异无统计学意义。各种潜在混杂因素对 PIPD 降低的影响无显著作用。两种治疗方法均未显著改善探诊后 BoP;治疗后 37 个目标位点中有 30 个仍有 BoP。两组中仅有两个种植体(各一个)的结果定义为 PIPD<5mm,且无 BoP 和 SoP,判定为成功。

结论

NST 可降低 PI 种植体的 PIPD。与单独 NST 相比,全身使用 AMX 和 MTZ 辅助治疗并未显示出统计学上更优的效果。NST 联合或不联合抗生素对完全缓解种植体周围的炎症均无效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33b7/9314590/aa0040fd8ec4/CLR-33-548-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验