Shibli Jamil Awad, Ferrari Daniel Sanchez, Siroma Rafael Shinoske, Figueiredo Luciene Cristina de, Faveri Marcelo de, Feres Magda
Universidade de Guarulhos - UNG, Dental Research Division, Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 30;33(suppl 1):e080. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0080. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of adjunct systemic antibiotic treatment with metronidazole (MTZ) and amoxicillin (AMX) in patients receiving non-surgical subgingival debridement (NSD) for peri-implantitis. Forty subjects presenting with at least one implant with severe peri-implantitis were randomized into an experimental group [treated with NSD plus MTZ (400 mg) and AMX (500 mg) three times a day for 14 days] and a control group treated with NSD plus placebo. Clinical parameters and submucosal biofilm profiles were evaluated up to 1 year post-treatment. Overall, both treatments improved clinical parameters over time. At 1 year, mean probing depth (PD), mean clinical attachment (CA) level and proportions of red complex pathogens did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, mean PD and CA changes to 1-year posttreatment did not differ significantly between the two groups between baseline and 1-year post-treatment. These results suggest that the addition of MTZ and AMX to the treatment protocol of patients undergoing NSD for with severe peri-implantitis does not improve the clinical and microbiological outcomes of NSD. The fact that half of the implants in both groups did not achieve clinical success (PD < 5 mm, no BoP, no bone loss) suggest that neither of the tested protocols were effective for treating severe peri-implantitis.
本研究的目的是评估在接受非手术性龈下刮治术(NSD)治疗种植体周围炎的患者中,辅助全身应用甲硝唑(MTZ)和阿莫西林(AMX)抗生素治疗的效果。40例至少有一颗种植体患有重度种植体周围炎的受试者被随机分为实验组[接受NSD治疗,同时每天3次服用MTZ(400mg)和AMX(500mg),持续14天]和接受NSD加安慰剂治疗的对照组。在治疗后长达1年的时间里评估临床参数和黏膜下生物膜特征。总体而言,随着时间的推移,两种治疗方法均改善了临床参数。在1年时,两组之间的平均探诊深度(PD)、平均临床附着(CA)水平和红色复合体病原体比例无显著差异。此外,两组在基线和治疗后1年之间的平均PD和CA变化至治疗后1年时也无显著差异。这些结果表明,在接受NSD治疗重度种植体周围炎的患者治疗方案中添加MTZ和AMX并不能改善NSD的临床和微生物学结果。两组中各有一半的种植体未取得临床成功(PD<5mm,无探诊出血,无骨吸收)这一事实表明,所测试的两种方案均无法有效治疗重度种植体周围炎。