Bhogal Sukhdeep, Waksman Ron
Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St.Suite 4B-1, Washington, NWDC, 20010, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):355-364. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01654-z. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Vascular access and closure is a key part of endovascular procedures, and access site-related complications are an independent predictor of adverse procedural outcomes. The purpose of this review is to discuss the methods of vascular closure including manual compression, vascular closure devices (VCDs) for both arterial and venous arteriotomies, their mechanisms, and access site-related complications.
Various VCDs have been approved over the last three decades. These devices have different mechanisms to achieve hemostasis and are generally categorized into active and passive approximators. Studies have largely found that they are non-inferior to manual compression. Uncomplicated vascular closure is pertinent to avoid adverse procedure-related outcomes. The emergence of VCDs has reduced time to hemostasis, facilitating early ambulation and discharge and reducing hospitalization cost with comparable complication rate to manual compression. Nonetheless, they should be used in favorable vascular anatomy and are not intended to reduce complications.
血管通路建立与闭合是血管内介入手术的关键部分,而与穿刺部位相关的并发症是不良手术结局的独立预测因素。本综述旨在探讨血管闭合方法,包括手动压迫、用于动脉和静脉切开术的血管闭合装置(VCD)、其作用机制以及与穿刺部位相关的并发症。
在过去三十年中,多种VCD已获批准。这些装置实现止血的机制各不相同,通常分为主动和被动闭合器。研究大多发现它们不劣于手动压迫。实现简单的血管闭合对于避免不良手术相关结局至关重要。VCD的出现缩短了止血时间,便于早期活动和出院,并降低了住院费用,且并发症发生率与手动压迫相当。尽管如此,它们应在有利的血管解剖结构中使用,并非旨在减少并发症。