• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

石鸻与三种鹳形目物种(苍鹭、白鹭和朱鹮)的比较染色体图谱。

Comparative chromosome maps between the stone curlew and three ciconiiform species (the grey heron, little egret and crested ibis).

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Forensic Sciences, Ministry of Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01979-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12862-022-01979-x
PMID:35240987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8892796/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous cytogenetic studies show that the karyotypes of species in Ciconiiformes vary considerably, from 2n = 52 to 78. Their karyotypes include different numbers of small to minute bi-armed chromosomes that have evolved probably by fusions of two ancestral microchromosomes, besides macrochromosomes and dot-like microchromosomes. However, it is impossible to define the inter-species homologies of such small-sized bi-armed chromosomes based on chromosome morphology and banding characteristics. Although painting probes from the chicken (Gallus gallus, GGA) chromosomes 1-9 and Z have been widely used to investigate avian chromosome homologies, GGA microchromosome probes are rarely used in these studies because most GGA microchromosome probes generated by flow sorting often contain multiple GGA microchromosomes. In contrast, the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, BOE, Charadriiformes) has an atypical low diploid chromosome number (42) karyotype and only 4 pairs of dot-like microchromosomes; a set of chromosome-specific painting probes that cover all BOE chromosomes has been generated. To get a genome-wide view of evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements in different lineages of Ciconiiformes, we used BOE painting probes instead of GGA painting probes to analyze the karyotypes of three ciconiiform species belonging to two different families: the eastern grey heron (Ardea cinerea, ACI, 2n = 64, Ardeidae), the little egret (Egretta garzetta, EGA, 2n = 64, Ardeidae) and the crested ibis (Nipponia nippon, NNI, 2n = 68, Threskiornithidae).

RESULTS

BOE painting probes display the same hybridization pattern on chromosomes of ACI and EGA, while a different hybridization pattern is observed on chromosomes of NNI. BOE autosome probes detected 21 conserved homologous segments and 5 fusions on the sixteen pairs of recognizable chromosomes of ACI and EGA, while 16 conserved homologous segments and 4 fusions were found on the twelve pairs of recognizable chromosomes of NNI. Only a portion of smaller bi-armed chromosomes in the karyotypes of the ciconiiform species could have evolved from fusions of ancestral microchromosomes. In particular BOE 5, which is the result of a fusion between two segments homologous to GGA 7 and 8 respectively, was retained also as either a single chromosome in ACI (ACI 5) and EGA (EGA 5) or had fused with a part of the BOE 10 equivalent in NNI (NNI 5).

CONCLUSION

Our painting results indicate that different chromosome rearrangements occur in different ciconiiform lineages. Some of the small-sized bi-armed chromosomes in ACI, EGA and NNI are derived from the fusions of two microchromosomes, indicating that microchromosome fusions play an important role in ciconiiform chromosome evolution. The fusion segment homologous to GGA 7 and 8 is a potential cytogenetic signature that unites Ardeidae and Threskiornithidae.

摘要

背景

先前的细胞遗传学研究表明,鹳形目物种的核型差异很大,从 2n=52 到 78。它们的核型包括不同数量的小到微小的双着丝粒染色体,这些染色体可能是通过两个祖先微染色体的融合进化而来的,除了大染色体和点状微染色体之外。然而,基于染色体形态和带型特征,不可能定义这些小双着丝粒染色体的种间同源性。尽管来自鸡(Gallus gallus,GGA)染色体 1-9 和 Z 的涂染探针已被广泛用于研究鸟类染色体同源性,但 GGA 微染色体探针在这些研究中很少使用,因为大多数通过流式分选产生的 GGA 微染色体探针通常包含多个 GGA 微染色体。相比之下,丘鹬(Burhinus oedicnemus,BOE,Charadriiformes)具有典型的低二倍体染色体数(42)核型,仅包含 4 对点状微染色体;已经生成了一套涵盖所有 BOE 染色体的染色体特异性涂染探针。为了全面了解鹳形目不同谱系的进化染色体重排,我们使用 BOE 涂染探针代替 GGA 涂染探针分析了属于两个不同科的三种鹳形目物种的核型:东方苍鹭(Ardea cinerea,ACI,2n=64,Ardeidae)、小白鹭(Egretta garzetta,EGA,2n=64,Ardeidae)和朱鹮(Nipponia nippon,NNI,2n=68,Threskiornithidae)。

结果

BOE 涂染探针在 ACI 和 EGA 的染色体上显示出相同的杂交模式,而在 NNI 的染色体上观察到不同的杂交模式。BOE 常染色体探针在 ACI 和 EGA 的可识别的 16 对染色体上检测到 21 个保守同源片段和 5 个融合,而在 NNI 的 12 对可识别染色体上发现 16 个保守同源片段和 4 个融合。只有一小部分小双着丝粒染色体可能是由祖先微染色体的融合进化而来的。特别是 BOE 5,它是两个分别与 GGA 7 和 8 同源的片段融合的结果,也保留为 ACI(ACI 5)和 EGA(EGA 5)中的单个染色体,或者与 NNI 中与 BOE 10 相当的一部分融合(NNI 5)。

结论

我们的涂染结果表明,不同的鹳形目谱系发生了不同的染色体重排。ACI、EGA 和 NNI 中的一些小双着丝粒染色体是由两个微染色体融合而来的,这表明微染色体融合在鹳形目染色体进化中起着重要作用。与 GGA 7 和 8 同源的融合片段是将 Ardeidae 和 Threskiornithidae 联系在一起的潜在细胞遗传学特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/ccac8d1fc698/12862_2022_1979_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/fa1491e60a96/12862_2022_1979_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/1314e8a6ca9c/12862_2022_1979_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/98d110d608d5/12862_2022_1979_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/85e3d10eeaab/12862_2022_1979_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/3fb73cb5972a/12862_2022_1979_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/54dccd675856/12862_2022_1979_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/0666abbf503d/12862_2022_1979_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/ccac8d1fc698/12862_2022_1979_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/fa1491e60a96/12862_2022_1979_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/1314e8a6ca9c/12862_2022_1979_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/98d110d608d5/12862_2022_1979_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/85e3d10eeaab/12862_2022_1979_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/3fb73cb5972a/12862_2022_1979_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/54dccd675856/12862_2022_1979_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/0666abbf503d/12862_2022_1979_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/106f/8892796/ccac8d1fc698/12862_2022_1979_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative chromosome maps between the stone curlew and three ciconiiform species (the grey heron, little egret and crested ibis).石鸻与三种鹳形目物种(苍鹭、白鹭和朱鹮)的比较染色体图谱。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12862-022-01979-x.
2
Cross-species chromosome painting corroborates microchromosome fusion during karyotype evolution of birds.跨物种染色体描绘证实了鸟类核型进化过程中的微染色体融合。
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;126(3):281-304. doi: 10.1159/000251965. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
3
Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes)--an atypical species with low diploid number.鸟类比较基因组学:家鸡(原鸡)与石鸻(石鸻科,鸻形目)之间的相互染色体描绘——一种二倍体数目低的非典型物种
Chromosome Res. 2009;17(1):99-113. doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9021-6. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
4
Multidirectional chromosome painting substantiates the occurrence of extensive genomic reshuffling within Accipitriformes.多向染色体描绘证实了鹰形目内广泛基因组重排的发生。
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Sep 26;15:205. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0484-0.
5
Comparative Chromosome Painting in Two Brazilian Stork Species with Different Diploid Numbers.两种具有不同二倍体数目的巴西鹳类物种的比较染色体描绘
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;159(1):32-38. doi: 10.1159/000503019. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
A conserved karyotype? Chromosomal rearrangements in Charadrius collaris detected by BAC-FISH.是否存在保守的核型?通过 BAC-FISH 检测到蛎鹬的染色体重排。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0280164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280164. eCollection 2023.
7
Analysis of multiple chromosomal rearrangements in the genome of Willisornis vidua using BAC-FISH and chromosome painting on a supposed conserved karyotype.利用 BAC-FISH 和假定保守核型的染色体涂染技术分析 Willisornis vidua 基因组中的多种染色体重排。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01768-y.
8
Comparative chromosome painting in Spizaetus tyrannus and Gallus gallus with the use of macro- and microchromosome probes.利用大、微染色体探针进行栗鸢和鸡的比较染色体着色。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0259905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259905. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparative chromosome painting in three Pelecaniformes species (Aves): Exploring the role of macro and microchromosome fusions in karyotypic evolution.三种鹈形目鸟类(Aves)的比较染色体研究:探索巨染色体和微染色体融合在染色体进化中的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294776. eCollection 2023.
10
Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation.通过染色体涂染对隼亚科(隼科,隼形目,鸟类)染色体结构进行表征,并描绘其分化过程中的染色体重排。
Chromosome Res. 2008;16(1):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s10577-007-1210-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bird's-Eye View of Chromosomic Evolution in the Class Aves.鸟类 A 类染色体进化的鸟瞰图。
Cells. 2024 Feb 7;13(4):310. doi: 10.3390/cells13040310.
2
Comparative chromosome painting in three Pelecaniformes species (Aves): Exploring the role of macro and microchromosome fusions in karyotypic evolution.三种鹈形目鸟类(Aves)的比较染色体研究:探索巨染色体和微染色体融合在染色体进化中的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294776. eCollection 2023.
3
Cytotaxonomy and Molecular Analyses of (Ciconiidae: Ciconiiformes): Insights on Stork Phylogeny.

本文引用的文献

1
Interspecies Chromosome Mapping in Caprimulgiformes, Piciformes, Suliformes, and Trogoniformes (Aves): Cytogenomic Insight into Microchromosome Organization and Karyotype Evolution in Birds.雀形目、佛法僧目、鹳形目和䴕形目(鸟类)的种间染色体作图:对鸟类小染色体组织和核型进化的细胞基因组学见解。
Cells. 2021 Apr 7;10(4):826. doi: 10.3390/cells10040826.
2
Cytotaxonomy of Gallinula melanops (Gruiformes, Rallidae): Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic inference.黑水鸡(鹤形目,秧鸡科)的细胞分类学:核型进化与系统发育推断
Genet Mol Biol. 2021 Apr 2;44(2):e20200241. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0241. eCollection 2021.
3
Analysis of multiple chromosomal rearrangements in the genome of Willisornis vidua using BAC-FISH and chromosome painting on a supposed conserved karyotype.
鹳形目鹳科的细胞分类学和分子分析:鹳类系统发育的新见解。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;14(4):816. doi: 10.3390/genes14040816.
利用 BAC-FISH 和假定保守核型的染色体涂染技术分析 Willisornis vidua 基因组中的多种染色体重排。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12862-021-01768-y.
4
Chromosomal painting of the sandpiper (Actitis macularius) detects several fissions for the Scolopacidae family (Charadriiformes).矶鹬(Actitis macularius)的染色体描绘揭示了鹬科(鸻形目)的几次裂变。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12862-020-01737-x.
5
Chromosomal Analysis in (Aves, Cuculiformes) Reveals Extensive Genomic Reorganization and an Unusual Z-Autosome Robertsonian Translocation.(鸟纲,佛法僧目)的染色体分析揭示了广泛的基因组重排和一种不寻常的 Z-染色体罗伯逊易位。
Cells. 2020 Dec 22;10(1):4. doi: 10.3390/cells10010004.
6
An Unbiased Molecular Approach Using 3'-UTRs Resolves the Avian Family-Level Tree of Life.一种基于 3'UTR 的无偏分子方法解决了鸟类科水平的生命之树。
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Jan 4;38(1):108-127. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa191.
7
Chromosomal Evolution in the Phylogenetic Context: A Remarkable Karyotype Reorganization in Neotropical Parrot (Psittacidae).系统发育背景下的染色体进化:新热带鹦鹉(鹦鹉科)中显著的核型重组
Front Genet. 2020 Jul 10;11:721. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00721. eCollection 2020.
8
A Comprehensive Cytogenetic Analysis of Several Members of the Family Columbidae (Aves, Columbiformes).几种鸠鸽科鸟类(鸟纲,鸽形目)的综合细胞遗传学分析。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jun 8;11(6):632. doi: 10.3390/genes11060632.
9
Introducing the Bird Chromosome Database: An Overview of Cytogenetic Studies in Birds.介绍鸟类染色体数据库:鸟类细胞遗传学研究综述。
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020;160(4):199-205. doi: 10.1159/000507768. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Novel insights into chromosome evolution of Charadriiformes: extensive genomic reshuffling in the wattled jacana (Jacana jacana, Charadriiformes, Jacanidae).鸻形目染色体进化的新见解:水雉(水雉属水雉,鸻形目,水雉科)中广泛的基因组重排
Genet Mol Biol. 2020 Feb 17;43(1):e20190236. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0236. eCollection 2020.