School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 13;42(15):3150-3164. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0627-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
The control of contraction strength is a key part of movement control. In primates, both corticospinal and reticulospinal cells provide input to motoneurons. Corticospinal discharge is known to correlate with force, but there are no previous reports of how reticular formation (RF) activity modulates with different contractions. Here we trained two female macaque monkeys (body weight, 5.9-6.9 kg) to pull a handle that could be loaded with 0.5-6 kg weights and recorded from identified pyramidal tract neurons (PTNs) in primary motor cortex and RF cells during task performance. Population-averaged firing rate increased monotonically with higher force for the RF, but showed a complex profile with little net modulation for PTNs. This reflected a more heterogeneous profile of rate modulation across the PTN population, leading to cancellation in the average. Linear discriminant analysis classified the force based on the time course of rate modulation equally well for PTNs and RF cells. Peak firing rate had significant linear correlation with force for 43 of 92 PTNs (46.7%) and 21 of 46 RF cells (43.5%). For almost all RF cells (20 of 21), the correlation coefficient was positive; similar numbers of PTNs (22 vs 21) had positive versus negative coefficients. Considering the timing of force representation, similar fractions (PTNs: 61.2%; RF cells: 55.5%) commenced coding before the onset of muscle activity. We conclude that both corticospinal and reticulospinal tracts contribute to the control of contraction force; the reticulospinal tract seems to specify an overall signal simply related to force, whereas corticospinal cell activity would be better suited for fine-scale adjustments. For the first time, we compare the coding of force for corticospinal and reticular formation cells in awake behaving monkeys, over a wide range of contraction strengths likely to come close to maximum voluntary contraction. Both cortical and brainstem systems coded similarly well for force, but whereas reticular formation cells carried a simple uniform signal, corticospinal neurons were more heterogeneous. This may reflect a role in the gross specification of a coordinated movement, versus more fine-grained adjustments around individual joints.
收缩强度的控制是运动控制的关键部分。在灵长类动物中,皮质脊髓和网状脊髓细胞都向运动神经元提供输入。已知皮质脊髓放电与力相关,但以前没有关于网状结构(RF)活动如何随不同收缩而调节的报道。在这里,我们训练了两只雌性猕猴(体重 5.9-6.9 公斤)拉动一个手柄,该手柄可以加载 0.5-6 公斤的重量,并在任务执行过程中记录来自初级运动皮层和 RF 细胞的已识别锥体束神经元(PTN)的活动。RF 的群体平均放电率随力的增加呈单调增加,但 PTN 的净调制复杂,调制幅度小。这反映了 PTN 群体中调制率的更异构分布,导致平均情况下的抵消。线性判别分析同样可以根据 PTN 和 RF 细胞的速率调制时程对力进行分类。92 个 PTN 中有 43 个(46.7%)和 46 个 RF 细胞中有 21 个(43.5%)的峰值放电率与力呈显著线性相关。对于几乎所有的 RF 细胞(20 个中有 21 个),相关系数为正;具有正相关系数的 PTN 数量(22 个)与具有负相关系数的 PTN 数量(21 个)相同。考虑到力表示的时间,类似数量的 PTN(61.2%)和 RF 细胞(55.5%)在肌肉活动开始之前开始编码。我们得出结论,皮质脊髓和网状脊髓束都有助于收缩力的控制;网状脊髓束似乎简单地与力相关,而皮质脊髓细胞活动更适合微调。这是第一次在清醒行为猴子中比较皮质脊髓和网状形成细胞对力的编码,在可能接近最大自愿收缩的广泛收缩强度范围内进行比较。皮质和脑干系统对力的编码都很好,但网状形成细胞携带简单的均匀信号,而皮质脊髓神经元则更加异质。这可能反映了在协调运动的总体规范中的作用,而不是在各个关节周围进行更精细的调整。