• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘挑战:早期乳腺癌保乳手术后残留疾病的风险因素。

The Margins' Challenge: Risk Factors of Residual Disease After Breast Conserving Surgery in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Breast Surgery Clinic, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):814-820. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12768.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.12768
PMID:35241537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinicopathological features of patients undergoing margin enlargement after lumpectomy for early breast cancer with positive/close excision margins were analyzed in order to define whether a re-operative procedure could have been avoided. Furthermore, a standardized protocol of specimen orientation was adopted in order to optimize both the widening procedure as well as the oncologic outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed including pre-, peri-, and post-operative parameters, and a predictive score by means of a multivariate model was developed using all clinically and statistically significant variables associated with residual disease (RD).

RESULTS

RD was significantly related to positive tumor margins, hormone receptor negative, HER2-positive, and tumors with high Ki67 proliferation index (p<0.001); the corresponding contribution to the prognostic score was as follows: close margins, 3 points; hormone receptor positive disease, 2 points; low Ki67, 2 points; HER2 negativity, 1 point. In 102 patients with a score >3, only 2 patients (2.0%) had RD, while in 81 patients with a score ≤3, 55 patients (67.9%) had RD (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This predictive model might aid in clinical-decision making of patients with positive margins who actually require a widening procedure after intraoperative and/or definitive histology.

摘要

背景/目的:分析保乳术后切缘阳性/近切缘的早期乳腺癌患者扩大切缘的临床病理特征,以明确是否可以避免再次手术。此外,采用了标本定向的标准化方案,以优化扩大手术和肿瘤学结果。

患者和方法

进行了回顾性分析,包括术前、术中和术后参数,并通过多变量模型开发了预测评分,使用与残留疾病(RD)相关的所有临床和统计学上显著的变量。

结果

RD 与肿瘤阳性切缘、激素受体阴性、HER2 阳性和 Ki67 增殖指数高的肿瘤显著相关(p<0.001);对预后评分的相应贡献如下:切缘阳性,3 分;激素受体阳性疾病,2 分;Ki67 低,2 分;HER2 阴性,1 分。在评分>3 的 102 例患者中,仅 2 例(2.0%)有 RD,而在评分≤3 的 81 例患者中,55 例(67.9%)有 RD(p<0.001)。

结论

该预测模型可能有助于指导切缘阳性的患者做出临床决策,这些患者实际上需要在术中及/或最终组织学检查后进行扩大手术。

相似文献

1
The Margins' Challenge: Risk Factors of Residual Disease After Breast Conserving Surgery in Early-stage Breast Cancer.边缘挑战:早期乳腺癌保乳手术后残留疾病的风险因素。
In Vivo. 2022 Mar-Apr;36(2):814-820. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12768.
2
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
3
Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?乳腺癌保乳术后切缘阳性:是否都需要再次切除?
Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;30:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.与原发性可手术乳腺癌的手术切缘累及、再次手术和残留癌相关的临床病理因素——对 2050 例患者的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;44(11):1725-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.07.056. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术患者中,再次切除对切缘阳性及切缘接近阳性的作用。
Breast. 2014 Dec;23(6):870-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.超声引导下保乳手术后,切缘阳性患者的再次切除率较低。
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后再次切除标本中残留疾病的预测因素。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):339-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01249.x. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.保乳手术中术中切缘管理技术的比较:标准化方法可降低残留疾病的可能性,且不增加手术时间。
Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):262-8. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0473-3. Epub 2013 May 7.
9
Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.乳腺癌的肿块切除术切缘、再次切除及局部复发
Am J Surg. 2000 Feb;179(2):81-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00272-5.
10
A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.对切缘阳性的乳房肿块切除标本进行墨水引导再切除与传统全腔再切除的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Oct;8(9):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s10434-001-0693-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Surgical Specimens: A Marking Challenge and a Novel Solution-A Prospective, Randomized Study.乳腺癌手术标本:一项标记挑战与一种新解决方案——一项前瞻性随机研究
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 17;13(4):984. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040984.
2
Optimizing thoracodorsal artery perforator flap outcomes in oncoplastic breast surgery: multidimensional assistive techniques mitigate learning curve and enhance feasibility.优化肿瘤整形乳房手术中胸背动脉穿支皮瓣的效果:多维辅助技术可减轻学习曲线并提高可行性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 29;15(1):10937. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95073-z.
3
Evaluating Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Breast-conserving Surgery Using E-cadherin Staining as a Biomarker.使用 E-钙黏蛋白染色作为生物标志物评估接受保乳手术患者的复发风险。
In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1143-1151. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13549.
4
Oncoplastic level II volume displacement surgery for breast cancer: oncological and aesthetic outcomes.乳腺癌整形水平 II 容积移位手术:肿瘤学和美学结果。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1289-1296. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01472-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Association of Surgical Margin Status with Oncologic Outcome in Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery.保乳手术治疗患者的手术切缘状态与肿瘤学结局的相关性。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 27;29(12):9271-9283. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120726.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南:乳腺癌》第 3.2020 版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):452-478. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0016.
2
Intraoperative inking is superior to suture marking for specimen orientation in breast cancer.术中墨水划线优于缝线标记在乳腺癌标本定向中的应用。
Breast J. 2020 Apr;26(4):661-667. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13508. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
No Ink on Ductal Carcinoma : A Single Centre Experience.导管癌无墨水染色:单中心经验
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jan;39(1):459-466. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13134.
4
Macroscopic Evaluation of the Trimmed Frozen Block Is a Helpful Tool for Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins of Breast Cancer Specimens.修剪后的冰冻组织块的宏观评估是术中评估乳腺癌标本切除边缘的有用工具。
Int J Surg Pathol. 2018 Dec;26(8):693-700. doi: 10.1177/1066896918780346. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Tumor Resection Margin Definitions in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Current Literature.保乳手术中肿瘤切缘定义:当前文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e595-e600. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
6
Vacuum assisted breast biopsy (VAB) excision of subcentimeter microcalcifications as an alternative to open biopsy for atypical ductal hyperplasia.真空辅助乳腺活检(VAB)切除亚厘米级微钙化灶作为非典型导管增生开放性活检的替代方法。
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20180003. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180003. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Novel techniques for intraoperative assessment of margin involvement.术中评估切缘受累情况的新技术。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jan 10;12:795. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.795. eCollection 2018.
8
Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough?乳腺癌的切缘:多少才算足够?
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124(7):1335-1341. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31221. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Management.乳腺癌治疗中的术中切缘评估
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;27(1):155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.08.006.
10
Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group.乳腺癌护理质量指标:EUSOMA工作组的最新报告。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Sep 28.