Wilkoff Bruce L, Sterns Laurence D, Katcher Michael S, Upadhyay Gaurav, Seizer Peter, Kang Chaoyi, Rhude Jennifer, Davis Kevin J, Fischer Avi
Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute - Robert and Suzanne Tomsich, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Division of Cardiology, Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, Canada.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Nov 18;3(1):70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.11.009. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) with low and varying signal amplitudes and morphologies may not be successfully identified utilizing traditional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithms.
Develop and validate a novel algorithm (VF Therapy Assurance, VFTA) to improve detection and timely delivery of high-voltage therapy (HVT) for these arrhythmias.
Arrhythmia detection was simulated on recorded VTA electrograms (EGMs) utilizing Abbott's Merlin.net database. EGMs where an HVT occurred only when VFTA was enabled, or where VFTA provided an HVT >30 seconds earlier than without VFTA, were readjudicated with physician review. As VFTA never prevents detection or therapy, EGMs where VFTA did not activate or alter HVT were not adjudicated.
Among 564,353 recorded VTA EGMs from 20,000 devices, VFTA altered HVT in 105 EGMs from 67 devices. Physician adjudication determined that 81.9% (86/105) of these EGMs were true undertreated VTA episodes and would have received appropriate HVT with VFTA enabled. Furthermore, 65% of the episodes (56/86) were ventricular fibrillation, were polymorphic, did not self-terminate during the recording window, or were not amenable antitachycardia pacing. Of those, 87.5% (49/56) would not have elicited HVT without VFTA. Overall, VFTA provided new or earlier appropriate HVT in 0.27% (53/20,000) of devices with an increase in inappropriate HVT in 0.07% (14/20,000) devices.
The VFTA algorithm successfully identifies VTA missed by traditional detection algorithms, owing to undersensed ventricular signals resulting in the rate falling below the programmed detection rate. The use of VFTA increases the likelihood of delivering life-saving HVT.
信号幅度低且形态各异的室性快速心律失常(VTA)可能无法通过传统植入式心脏复律除颤器算法成功识别。
开发并验证一种新算法(室颤治疗保障,VFTA),以改善对这些心律失常的检测并及时提供高压治疗(HVT)。
利用雅培的Merlin.net数据库,在记录的VTA心电图(EGM)上模拟心律失常检测。对于仅在启用VFTA时才发生HVT,或VFTA比未启用VFTA时提前>30秒提供HVT的EGM,由医生重新判定。由于VFTA从不阻止检测或治疗,因此未对VFTA未激活或未改变HVT的EGM进行判定。
在来自20000台设备的564353条记录的VTA EGM中,VFTA改变了来自67台设备的105条EGM中的HVT。医生判定确定,这些EGM中有81.9%(86/105)是真正治疗不足的VTA发作,启用VFTA后会接受适当的HVT。此外,65%的发作(56/86)为室颤,多形性,在记录窗口内未自行终止,或不适合抗心动过速起搏。其中,87.5%(49/56)在未启用VFTA时不会引发HVT。总体而言,VFTA在0.27%(53/20000)的设备中提供了新的或更早的适当HVT,在0.07%(14/20000)的设备中不适当HVT有所增加。
VFTA算法成功识别出传统检测算法遗漏的VTA,这是由于心室信号感知不足导致心率低于编程检测率。使用VFTA增加了提供挽救生命的HVT的可能性。