Suppr超能文献

Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 与 F-FDG PET/CT 诊断胰腺癌的效能比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

出版信息

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul;49(8):2877-2888. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05729-5. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the performance of  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR for the diagnosis of primary tumours as well as metastatic lesions in patients with pancreatic cancer and to compare the results with those of F-FDG PET/CT.

METHODS

Prospectively, we evaluated 33 patients suspected to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma, of whom thirty-two were confirmed by histopathology, and one had autoimmune pancreatitis confirmed by needle biopsy and glucocorticoid treatment. Within 1 week, each patient underwent both  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT. Comparisons of the detection abilities for primary tumours, lymph nodes, and metastases were conducted for the two imaging approaches. The original maximum standard uptake values (SUV) and normalised SUV (SUV/SUV) of paired lesions on  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty pancreatic cancer patients and three pancreatitis patients were enrolled.  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT exhibited equivalent (100%) detection rates for primary tumours. The original/normalised SUV of primary tumours on  Ga-FAPI-04 PET was markedly higher than that on F-FDG (p < 0.05). Sixteen pancreatic cancer patients had pancreatic parenchymal uptake, whereas F-FDG PET images showed parenchymal uptake in only four patients (53.33% vs. 13.33%, p < 0.001).  Ga-FAPI-04 PET detected more positive lymph nodes than F-FDG PET (42 vs. 30, p < 0.001), while F-FDG PET was able to detect more liver metastases than  Ga-FAPI-04 (181 vs. 104, p < 0.001). In addition, multisequence MR imaging helped explain ten pancreatic cancers that could not be definitively revealed due to  Ga-FAPI-04 inflammatory uptake and identified more liver metastases than F-FDG (256 vs. 181, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ga-FAPI-04 PET might be better than F-FDG PET in the detection of suspicious lymph node metastases. MR multiple sequence imaging of  Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR was helpful for explaining pancreatic lesions in patients with obstructive inflammation and detecting tiny liver metastases.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 对胰腺癌患者原发肿瘤和转移灶的诊断性能,并与 F-FDG PET/CT 的结果进行比较。

方法

前瞻性地,我们评估了 33 例疑似胰腺腺癌的患者,其中 32 例经组织病理学证实,1 例经针吸活检和糖皮质激素治疗证实为自身免疫性胰腺炎。在 1 周内,每位患者均同时进行 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 检查。对两种成像方法检测原发肿瘤、淋巴结和转移灶的能力进行了比较。测量并比较了 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 配对病变的原始最大标准摄取值(SUV)和归一化 SUV(SUV/SUV)。

结果

共纳入 30 例胰腺癌患者和 3 例胰腺炎患者。Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 对原发肿瘤的检出率相当(100%)。Ga-FAPI-04 PET 原发肿瘤的原始/归一化 SUV 明显高于 F-FDG(p<0.05)。16 例胰腺癌患者有胰腺实质摄取,而 F-FDG PET 图像仅显示 4 例患者有实质摄取(53.33%比 13.33%,p<0.001)。Ga-FAPI-04 PET 检测到的阳性淋巴结数多于 F-FDG PET(42 比 30,p<0.001),而 F-FDG PET 检测到的肝转移灶数多于 Ga-FAPI-04(181 比 104,p<0.001)。此外,多序列 MR 成像有助于解释 10 例由于 Ga-FAPI-04 炎症摄取而无法明确显示的胰腺癌,并比 F-FDG 检测到更多的肝转移灶(256 比 181,p<0.001)。

结论

Ga-FAPI-04 PET 在可疑淋巴结转移的检测中可能优于 F-FDG PET。Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 的多序列 MR 成像有助于解释梗阻性炎症患者的胰腺病变,并检测微小的肝转移灶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验