Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul;49(8):2877-2888. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05729-5. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
We sought to assess the performance of Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR for the diagnosis of primary tumours as well as metastatic lesions in patients with pancreatic cancer and to compare the results with those of F-FDG PET/CT.
Prospectively, we evaluated 33 patients suspected to have pancreatic adenocarcinoma, of whom thirty-two were confirmed by histopathology, and one had autoimmune pancreatitis confirmed by needle biopsy and glucocorticoid treatment. Within 1 week, each patient underwent both Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT. Comparisons of the detection abilities for primary tumours, lymph nodes, and metastases were conducted for the two imaging approaches. The original maximum standard uptake values (SUV) and normalised SUV (SUV/SUV) of paired lesions on Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT were measured and compared.
Thirty pancreatic cancer patients and three pancreatitis patients were enrolled. Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and F-FDG PET/CT exhibited equivalent (100%) detection rates for primary tumours. The original/normalised SUV of primary tumours on Ga-FAPI-04 PET was markedly higher than that on F-FDG (p < 0.05). Sixteen pancreatic cancer patients had pancreatic parenchymal uptake, whereas F-FDG PET images showed parenchymal uptake in only four patients (53.33% vs. 13.33%, p < 0.001). Ga-FAPI-04 PET detected more positive lymph nodes than F-FDG PET (42 vs. 30, p < 0.001), while F-FDG PET was able to detect more liver metastases than Ga-FAPI-04 (181 vs. 104, p < 0.001). In addition, multisequence MR imaging helped explain ten pancreatic cancers that could not be definitively revealed due to Ga-FAPI-04 inflammatory uptake and identified more liver metastases than F-FDG (256 vs. 181, p < 0.001).
Ga-FAPI-04 PET might be better than F-FDG PET in the detection of suspicious lymph node metastases. MR multiple sequence imaging of Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR was helpful for explaining pancreatic lesions in patients with obstructive inflammation and detecting tiny liver metastases.
我们旨在评估 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 对胰腺癌患者原发肿瘤和转移灶的诊断性能,并与 F-FDG PET/CT 的结果进行比较。
前瞻性地,我们评估了 33 例疑似胰腺腺癌的患者,其中 32 例经组织病理学证实,1 例经针吸活检和糖皮质激素治疗证实为自身免疫性胰腺炎。在 1 周内,每位患者均同时进行 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 检查。对两种成像方法检测原发肿瘤、淋巴结和转移灶的能力进行了比较。测量并比较了 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 配对病变的原始最大标准摄取值(SUV)和归一化 SUV(SUV/SUV)。
共纳入 30 例胰腺癌患者和 3 例胰腺炎患者。Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 和 F-FDG PET/CT 对原发肿瘤的检出率相当(100%)。Ga-FAPI-04 PET 原发肿瘤的原始/归一化 SUV 明显高于 F-FDG(p<0.05)。16 例胰腺癌患者有胰腺实质摄取,而 F-FDG PET 图像仅显示 4 例患者有实质摄取(53.33%比 13.33%,p<0.001)。Ga-FAPI-04 PET 检测到的阳性淋巴结数多于 F-FDG PET(42 比 30,p<0.001),而 F-FDG PET 检测到的肝转移灶数多于 Ga-FAPI-04(181 比 104,p<0.001)。此外,多序列 MR 成像有助于解释 10 例由于 Ga-FAPI-04 炎症摄取而无法明确显示的胰腺癌,并比 F-FDG 检测到更多的肝转移灶(256 比 181,p<0.001)。
Ga-FAPI-04 PET 在可疑淋巴结转移的检测中可能优于 F-FDG PET。Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 的多序列 MR 成像有助于解释梗阻性炎症患者的胰腺病变,并检测微小的肝转移灶。