• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放疗计划中的质量计划——综述影响因素与挑战

Plan quality in radiotherapy treatment planning - Review of the factors and challenges.

机构信息

Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar;66(2):267-278. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13374.

DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13374
PMID:35243775
Abstract

A high-quality treatment plan aims to best achieve the clinical prescription, balancing high target dose to maximise tumour control against sufficiently low organ-at-risk dose for acceptably low toxicity. Treatment planning (TP) includes multiple steps from simulation/imaging and segmentation to technical plan production and reporting. Consistent quality across this process requires close collaboration and communication between clinical and technical experts, to clearly understand clinical requirements and priorities and also practical uncertainties, limitations and compromises. TP quality depends on many aspects, starting from commissioning and quality management of the treatment planning system (TPS), including its measured input data and detailed understanding of TPS models and limitations. It requires rigorous quality assurance of the whole planning process and it links to plan deliverability, assessable by measurement-based verification. This review highlights some factors influencing plan quality, for consideration for optimal plan construction and hence optimal outcomes for each patient. It also indicates some challenges, sources of difference and current developments. The topics considered include: the evolution of TP techniques; dose prescription issues; tools and methods to evaluate plan quality; and some aspects of practical TP. The understanding of what constitutes a high-quality treatment plan continues to evolve with new techniques, delivery methods and related evidence-based science. This review summarises the current position, noting developments in the concept and the need for further robust tools to help achieve it.

摘要

高质量的治疗计划旨在最好地实现临床处方,在最大化肿瘤控制的高目标剂量与可接受低毒性的足够低的器官风险剂量之间取得平衡。治疗计划(TP)包括从模拟/成像和分割到技术计划制作和报告的多个步骤。在这个过程中,临床和技术专家之间需要密切合作和沟通,以清楚地了解临床需求和优先级,以及实际的不确定性、限制和妥协,从而实现整个过程的质量一致。TP 质量取决于许多方面,从治疗计划系统(TPS)的委托和质量管理开始,包括其测量输入数据以及对 TPS 模型和限制的详细了解。它需要对整个规划过程进行严格的质量保证,并与可交付计划的能力相关联,可通过基于测量的验证进行评估。这篇综述强调了一些影响计划质量的因素,以供考虑最佳计划构建,从而为每个患者获得最佳结果。它还指出了一些挑战、差异来源和当前的发展。所考虑的主题包括:TP 技术的演变;剂量处方问题;评估计划质量的工具和方法;以及实际 TP 的一些方面。随着新技术、交付方法和相关循证科学的发展,高质量治疗计划的概念仍在不断发展。这篇综述总结了当前的情况,指出了概念的发展以及进一步开发强大工具的必要性,以帮助实现这一目标。

相似文献

1
Plan quality in radiotherapy treatment planning - Review of the factors and challenges.放疗计划中的质量计划——综述影响因素与挑战
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar;66(2):267-278. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13374.
2
Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.使用COMPASS对立体定向容积调强弧形放疗的三维剂量学进行定量评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 7;16(1):5128. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5128.
3
Evaluation of Delta Anatomy in 3D Patient-Specific IMRT Quality Assurance.三维个体化调强放疗质量保证中 Delta 解剖结构的评估。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033820945816. doi: 10.1177/1533033820945816.
4
Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.叶片运动限制对调强适形放疗计划质量、实施准确性和效率的影响。
Med Phys. 2011 Nov;38(11):6106-18. doi: 10.1118/1.3651698.
5
What is plan quality in radiotherapy? The importance of evaluating dose metrics, complexity, and robustness of treatment plans.放疗中的计划质量是指什么?评估剂量指标、计划复杂性和稳健性的重要性。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.038. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Use of plan quality degradation to evaluate tradeoffs in delivery efficiency and clinical plan metrics arising from IMRT optimizer and sequencer compromises.利用计划质量下降来评估由于调强放疗优化器和序列器折衷而导致的输送效率和临床计划指标之间的权衡。
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071708. doi: 10.1118/1.4808118.
7
Quantitative metrics for assessing plan quality.评估计划质量的定量指标。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan;22(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.005.
8
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.基于放射生物学指标的螺旋断层放射治疗与基于多叶准直器的调强放射治疗的治疗计划比较
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 7;52(13):3817-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011. Epub 2007 May 31.
9
Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).技术说明:治疗计划系统(TPS)的近似值很重要——比较商业TPS 和内部开发的 TPS 在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)计划质量和稳健性。
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):4755-4762. doi: 10.1002/mp.13809. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
10
Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources.放射治疗计划助手——一种基于网络的工具,用于在资源有限的诊所支持高质量放射治疗。
J Vis Exp. 2023 Oct 6(200). doi: 10.3791/65504.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice and Evaluation of Competence in the Application of Monaco Planning System in Undergraduate Radiotherapy Internship Teaching: A Randomized Controlled Study.蒙特卡洛计划系统在本科放射治疗实习教学中应用能力的实践与评估:一项随机对照研究
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Sep 3;12:23821205251372109. doi: 10.1177/23821205251372109. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Innovative Education Method for a More Effective, Faster, and Valued Training in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.用于放射治疗治疗计划中更有效、更快且更有价值培训的创新教育方法。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 8;9(5):101454. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101454. eCollection 2024 May.
3
ACPSEM position paper: pre-treatment patient specific plan checks and quality assurance in radiation oncology.
澳大利亚临床肿瘤医师协会立场文件:放射肿瘤学中治疗前患者特定计划检查和质量保证。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Mar;47(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01367-9. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Updating approach for lexicographic optimization-based planning to improve cervical cancer plan quality.基于字典序优化的计划更新方法以提高宫颈癌计划质量。
Discov Oncol. 2023 Sep 30;14(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00800-5.
5
Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is 'Clinically Acceptable'?放射治疗中的自动轮廓勾画与计划:何为“临床可接受”?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;13(4):667. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040667.
6
Comprehensive dosimetric and clinical evaluation of lexicographic optimization-based planning for cervical cancer.基于词典序优化的宫颈癌放疗计划的综合剂量学与临床评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 16;12:1041839. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1041839. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of a hybrid automatic planning solution for rectal cancer.直肠癌混合自动规划解决方案的评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02129-9.