Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Namyangju, Korea.
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):140-150. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210340.
Intravesical BCG (bacille Calmette-Guérin) instillation in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer decreases the risk for tumor recurrence and progression. After one BCG product was discontinued, a chronic global BCG shortage occurred. We focused on identifying a reduced dose of BCG that could maintain efficacy and reduce adverse effects.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials through April 2021. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the low and standard doses in nine studies were compared. A low dose was defined as a low volume of BCG compared with the standard BCG dose (Armand Frappier, 120 mg; Connaught, 81 mg; Danish 1331, 120 mg; modified Danish 1331, 120 mg; Tokyo 172, 80 mg).
The low-dose group experienced aggravated recurrence (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94; p=0.01) but similar progression (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.76-1.62; p=0.59), similar cancer-specific survival (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.60-1.75; p=0.93), similar overall survival (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.76-1.56; p=0.65), favorable adverse effects (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.62; p<0.0001), and favorable withdrawal (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.71; p=0.001).
Low-dose BCG had more unfavorable outcomes than did standard-dose BCG in terms of recurrence. Tumor progression, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between the doses. Low-dose BCG improved adverse effects and withdrawal. In the setting of BCG shortage, low-dose BCG may have strong potential as an alternative.
经尿道膀胱内卡介苗(BCG)灌注治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌可降低肿瘤复发和进展的风险。在一种 BCG 产品被停用后,出现了全球范围内的 BCG 慢性短缺。我们专注于寻找一种低剂量的 BCG,既能保持疗效,又能减少不良反应。
我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了全面的文献检索,以确定截至 2021 年 4 月的随机对照试验。比较了 9 项研究中低剂量和标准剂量的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。低剂量定义为与标准 BCG 剂量相比,BCG 体积较小(Armand Frappier,120mg;Connaught,81mg;丹麦 1331,120mg;改良丹麦 1331,120mg;东京 172,80mg)。
低剂量组复发加重(OR,1.45;95%CI,1.09-1.94;p=0.01),但进展相似(OR,1.11;95%CI,0.76-1.62;p=0.59),癌症特异性生存相似(OR,1.02;95%CI,0.60-1.75;p=0.93),总生存相似(OR,1.09;95%CI,0.76-1.56;p=0.65),不良反应有利(OR,0.41;95%CI,0.28-0.62;p<0.0001),停药有利(OR,0.42;95%CI,0.25-0.71;p=0.001)。
与标准剂量 BCG 相比,低剂量 BCG 在复发方面的疗效较差。剂量之间肿瘤进展、癌症特异性生存和总生存相似。低剂量 BCG 改善了不良反应和停药。在 BCG 短缺的情况下,低剂量 BCG 可能具有作为替代的巨大潜力。