Madren Seth, McElroy Will, Schultz-Kuszak Kristin, Boumajny Boris, Shu Yao, Sautter Sabine, Zhao Helen C, Schadock-Hewitt Abby, Chumsae Chris, Ball Nancy, Zhang Xiaoying, Rish Kimberly, Zhang Shukui, Wurm Christine, Cai Sumin, Bauer Scott P, Stella Cinzia, Zheng Laura, Roper Brian, Michels David A, Wu Gang, Kocjan Bostjan, Birk Matej, Erdmann Simon Erik, He Xiaoping, Whittaker Brad, Song Yvonne, Barrett Hannah, Strozyk Kevin, Jing Ye, Huang Long, Mhatre Vishal, McLean Paul, Yu Tiantian, Yang Huijuan, Mattila Minna
Technical Development, Biogen Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.
ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA.
Electrophoresis. 2022 May;43(9-10):1050-1058. doi: 10.1002/elps.202100348. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
An international team spanning 19 sites across 18 biopharmaceutical and in vitro diagnostics companies in the United States, Europe, and China, along with one regulatory agency, was formed to compare the precision and robustness of imaged CIEF (ICIEF) for the charge heterogeneity analysis of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) mAb and a rhPD-L1-Fc fusion protein on the iCE3 and the Maurice instruments. This information has been requested to help companies better understand how these instruments compare and how to transition ICIEF methods from iCE3 to the Maurice instrument. The different laboratories performed ICIEF on the NIST mAb and rhPD-L1-Fc with both the iCE3 and Maurice using analytical methods specifically developed for each of the molecules. After processing the electropherograms, statistical evaluation of the data was performed to determine consistencies within and between laboratory and outlying information. The apparent isoelectric point (pI) data generated, based on two-point calibration, for the main isoform of the NIST mAb showed high precision between laboratories, with RSD values of less than 0.3% on both instruments. The SDs for the NIST mAb and the rhPD-L1-Fc charged variants percent peak area values for both instruments are less than 1.02% across different laboratories. These results validate the appropriate use of both the iCE3 and Maurice for ICIEF in the biopharmaceutical industry in support of process development and regulatory submissions of biotherapeutic molecules. Further, the data comparability between the iCE3 and Maurice illustrates that the Maurice platform is a next-generation replacement for the iCE3 that provides comparable data.
一个由来自美国、欧洲和中国的18家生物制药和体外诊断公司的19个站点以及一个监管机构组成的国际团队成立了,旨在比较成像毛细管等速电泳(ICIEF)对美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)单克隆抗体和重组人程序性死亡受体配体1-免疫球蛋白Fc段(rhPD-L1-Fc)融合蛋白进行电荷异质性分析时,在iCE3和Maurice仪器上的精密度和稳健性。要求提供这些信息以帮助公司更好地了解这些仪器的比较情况以及如何将ICIEF方法从iCE3转换到Maurice仪器。不同实验室使用专门为每种分子开发的分析方法,在iCE3和Maurice上对NIST单克隆抗体和rhPD-L1-Fc进行ICIEF。处理电泳图后,对数据进行统计评估,以确定实验室内部和之间的一致性以及异常值信息。基于两点校准生成的NIST单克隆抗体主要异构体的表观等电点(pI)数据在各实验室之间显示出高精度,两种仪器上的相对标准偏差(RSD)值均小于0.3%。两种仪器上NIST单克隆抗体和rhPD-L1-Fc带电变体峰面积百分比值在不同实验室的标准差均小于1.02%。这些结果验证了iCE3和Maurice在生物制药行业中用于ICIEF以支持生物治疗分子的工艺开发和监管申报的适用性。此外,iCE3和Maurice之间的数据可比性表明,Maurice平台是iCE3的下一代替代品,可提供可比数据。