Human parasites as tracers of the evolution of their hosts.

Because parasite data reveal essential information about the behavior and history of their hosts, it is possible to use them as tracers of host evolution. A table built from the analysis of the data contained in the book by Ashford and Crewe "The Parasites of Homo sapiens" allows counting and cross comparing the parasites according to the main descriptors used by the authors: Taxonomic groups, for each group number of parasites species identified in humans; Status, numbers of reported human cases and their dispersion; Geographic distribution, parasite specific richness recorded in biogeographic regions; Habitat, parasite location in or on the human body; Transmission, contamination pathways to man; Hosts, non-human hosts, which have a role in the maintenance of a parasite; Host-specificity status, relative role of man or other hosts in the maintenance of parasite populations. A strong positive correlation is observed between the number of parasites species recorded in humans and the global parasite species richness for each taxonomic group. About 74% of the parasites recorded in humans are rare, sporadic or nowhere common; 10% only are common or abundant worldwide. The Palearctic exhibits the highest parasite species diversity; the Oriental, Nearctic, Neotropical and Aethiopian regions have roughly similar richness values; the Australian Region is the poorest. Earliest domesticated animals, such as dog, cat, cattle or pig, share more parasite species with Humans than tardily domesticated as horse, rabbit or camel. More than one third of our parasites have elected our alimentary canal as a home and about two third are using the digestive tract path for contamination. Time of occupancy of new territories, diversity in feeding habits and commensalism with other animals, widely explain Human particular parasite richness. As suggested by the authors: "There must be few parasitic species which have never had the opportunity to infect a human".