Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pathology. 2022 Aug;54(5):526-532. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2021.12.290. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
Testing for BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma is pivotal to identifying patients suitable for targeted therapy and influences treatment decisions regarding single agent versus combination immunotherapy. Knowledge of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) results can streamline decisions during initial oncology consultations, prior to DNA-based test results. In the absence of formal guidelines that require pathologist initiated ('reflex') BRAF mutation testing, our institution developed a local protocol to perform BRAF V600E IHC on specimens from all stage III/IV melanoma patients when the status is otherwise unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the application of this protocol in a tertiary referral pathology department. A total of 408 stage III/IV melanoma patients had tissue specimens accessioned between 1 January and 31 March in three consecutive years (from 2019 to 2021), reported by 32 individual pathologists. The BRAF mutation status was established by pathologists in 87% (352/408) of cases. When a prior BRAF mutation status was previously known, as confirmed in linked electronic records (202/408), this status had been communicated by the clinician on the pathology request form in 1% of cases (3/202). Pathologists performed BRAF V600E IHC in 153 cases (74% of cases where the status was unknown, 153/206) and testing was duplicated in 5% of cases (20/408). Reflex BRAF IHC testing was omitted in 26% of cases (53/206), often on specimens with small volume disease (cytology specimens or sentinel node biopsies) despite adequate tissue for testing. Incorporating BRAF IHC testing within routine diagnostic protocols of stage III/IV melanoma was both feasible and successful in most cases. Communication of a patient's BRAF mutation status via the pathology request form will likely improve implementation of pathologist initiated BRAF mutation testing and may result in a reduction of duplicate tests. To improve pathologist reflex testing rates, we advocate for the use of an algorithmic approach to pathologist initiated BRAF mutation testing utilising both IHC and DNA-based methodologies for stage III/IV melanoma patients.
检测转移性黑色素瘤中的 BRAF 突变对于确定适合靶向治疗的患者至关重要,并影响针对单药治疗与联合免疫治疗的治疗决策。BRAF V600E 免疫组化(IHC)结果的知识可以简化初始肿瘤学咨询期间的决策,而无需等待基于 DNA 的检测结果。在没有要求病理学家启动(“反射性”)BRAF 突变检测的正式指南的情况下,我们的机构制定了一项当地方案,即在所有 III/IV 期黑色素瘤患者的标本中进行 BRAF V600E IHC 检测,前提是该状态未知。本研究旨在评估该方案在三级转诊病理科的应用。在连续三年(2019 年至 2021 年)的 1 月 1 日至 3 月 31 日期间,共有 408 名 III/IV 期黑色素瘤患者的组织标本被登记,由 32 名个体病理学家报告。BRAF 突变状态由病理学家在 87%(352/408)的病例中确定。当先前的 BRAF 突变状态已知时,如在相关电子记录中确认(202/408),则在 1%的病例(3/202)中,临床医生在病理申请单上进行了沟通。病理学家对 153 例(未知状态的病例中有 74%,153/206)进行了 BRAF V600E IHC 检测,5%的病例(408/408)进行了重复检测。26%的病例(53/206)省略了反射性 BRAF IHC 检测,尽管有足够的检测组织,但通常是在体积较小的疾病标本上(细胞学标本或前哨淋巴结活检)。在 III/IV 期黑色素瘤的常规诊断方案中纳入 BRAF IHC 检测在大多数情况下是可行且成功的。通过病理申请单向患者传达 BRAF 突变状态,可能会改善病理学家启动的 BRAF 突变检测的实施,并可能减少重复检测。为了提高病理学家的反射性检测率,我们提倡在 III/IV 期黑色素瘤患者中使用基于 IHC 和基于 DNA 的方法的算法方法来启动 BRAF 突变检测。