Department of Psychological Medicine, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2022 Apr;32(3):153-161. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0083. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical profiles, tolerability, and efficacy of two groups of antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and the atypical antidepressant, mirtazapine, in children and adolescents treated in a large pediatric Hematology-Oncology center. A review of computerized medical charts of 32 pediatric patients with cancer, from December 2011 to April 2020, was conducted. Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressant medications were retrospectively analyzed. The Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scales were used to evaluate psychiatric symptoms severity before and following treatment, while the data on adverse events and drug-drug interactions were retrieved from the computerized medical records. Thirty-two children and adolescents with cancer, 2-21 years of age (mean 14.1 ± 4.6 years), were treated with antidepressants. Fourteen patients (44%) received mirtazapine, whereas 18 patients (56%) received SSRIs: sertraline (25%), escitalopram (25%), or fluoxetine (6%). Treatment choice was dictated either by physician preference or informed by potential drug-drug interactions. The most common psychiatric diagnoses were major depressive disorders (47%), anxiety disorders (19%), and medication-induced psychiatric disorders (19%). The most common psychiatric-medical symptoms were depressed mood (94%) and anxiety (62%). CGI-S improved significantly ( < 0.05) between pretreatment and on-treatment assessments, with no statistically significant difference between SSRI and mirtazapine-treated patients. CGI-I scores at reassessment indicated improvement in most patients (84%). Adverse events of treatment were mild in all patients. The antidepressants used in this study, SSRIs and mirtazapine, were effective and well tolerated in children and adolescents with cancer and psychiatric comorbidities. Given the high rates of depression and anxiety in children with cancer, large-scale, multisite, prospective clinical trials of antidepressants are warranted.
本研究旨在描述在一家大型儿科血液肿瘤中心接受治疗的两组抗抑郁药(选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂[SSRIs])和非典型抗抑郁药米氮平的儿童和青少年的临床特征、耐受性和疗效。对 2011 年 12 月至 2020 年 4 月期间的 32 名患有癌症的儿科患者的计算机病历进行了回顾性审查。对抗抑郁药物的疗效和耐受性进行了回顾性分析。使用临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)和临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)量表评估治疗前后的精神症状严重程度,同时从计算机病历中检索不良事件和药物相互作用的数据。32 名年龄在 2-21 岁(平均 14.1 ± 4.6 岁)的癌症儿童和青少年接受了抗抑郁药治疗。14 名患者(44%)接受了米氮平治疗,而 18 名患者(56%)接受了 SSRIs:舍曲林(25%)、依他普仑(25%)或氟西汀(6%)。治疗选择取决于医生的偏好或潜在的药物相互作用。最常见的精神科诊断为重度抑郁症(47%)、焦虑症(19%)和药物引起的精神科疾病(19%)。最常见的精神科-医学症状是情绪低落(94%)和焦虑(62%)。治疗前和治疗期间的 CGI-S 评分显著改善(<0.05),SSRIs 和米氮平治疗患者之间无统计学差异。再评估时的 CGI-I 评分表明大多数患者有改善(84%)。所有患者的治疗不良反应均为轻度。本研究中使用的抗抑郁药,SSRIs 和米氮平,在患有癌症和精神共病的儿童和青少年中有效且耐受性良好。鉴于癌症儿童中抑郁和焦虑的发生率较高,需要进行大规模、多中心、前瞻性抗抑郁药临床试验。