Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Environ Int. 2022 Apr;162:107164. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107164. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
Neighborhood deprivation is linked with inflammation, which may explain poorer health across populations. Behavioral risk factors are assumed to largely mediate these relationships, but few studies have examined this. We examined three neighborhood contextual factors that could exert direct effects on inflammation: (1) neighborhood socioeconomic status, (2) an index of concentration at extremes (that measures segregation), and (3) surrounding vegetation (greenness).
Using blood samples and addresses collected from prospective cohorts of 7,930 male (1990-1994) and 16,183 female (1986-1990) health professionals with at least one inflammatory marker, we prospectively linked neighborhood contextual factors to inflammatory biomarkers (adiponectin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-2). Log-transformed, z-scaled component measures were used to calculate an inflammation score. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and index of concentration of extremes were obtained from the 1990 decennial census and linked to participant addresses. Surrounding greenness was assessed from satellite data and focal statistics were applied to generate exposures within 270 m and 1230 m of the participants' address. We fit multiple linear regression models adjusting for demographic, clinical, and behavioral risk factors.
Higher neighborhood socioeconomic status was associated with lower inflammation score in women (β for interquartile range increase = -27.7%, 95% CI: -34.9%, -19.8%) and men (β = -21.2%, 95% CI: -31.0%, -10.1%). Similarly, participants in neighborhoods with higher concentrations of high-income households were associated with lower inflammation score in women (β = -27.8%, 95% CI: -35.8%, -18.7%) and men (β = -16.4%, 95% CI: -29.7%, -0.56%). Surrounding greenness within 270 m of each participant's address was associated with lower inflammation score in women (β = -18.9%, 95% CI: -28.9%, -7.4%) but not men. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses to assess unmeasured confounding and selection bias.
Our findings support the hypothesis that adverse neighborhood environments may contribute to inflammation through pathways independent of behavioral risk factors, including psychosocial stress and toxic environments.
社区贫困与炎症有关,这可能解释了不同人群的健康状况较差。行为风险因素被认为在很大程度上可以调节这些关系,但很少有研究对此进行检验。我们研究了三个可能对炎症产生直接影响的社区环境因素:(1)社区社会经济地位;(2)极端集中指数(衡量隔离程度);(3)周围植被(绿化)。
使用前瞻性队列中 7930 名男性(1990-1994 年)和 16183 名女性(1986-1990 年)健康专业人员的血液样本和地址,我们前瞻性地将社区环境因素与炎症生物标志物(脂联素、C 反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体-2)联系起来。使用对数转换、z 标度分量测量来计算炎症评分。社区社会经济地位和极端集中指数是从 1990 年的十年人口普查中获得的,并与参与者的地址相关联。周围的绿化是从卫星数据中评估的,并应用焦点统计数据在距离参与者地址 270 米和 1230 米的范围内生成暴露。我们通过调整人口统计学、临床和行为风险因素来拟合多元线性回归模型。
女性(四分位距增加的β值= -27.7%,95%CI:-34.9%,-19.8%)和男性(β值= -21.2%,95%CI:-31.0%,-10.1%)中,较高的社区社会经济地位与较低的炎症评分相关。同样,高收入家庭集中程度较高的社区中,女性(β值= -27.8%,95%CI:-35.8%,-18.7%)和男性(β值= -16.4%,95%CI:-29.7%,-0.56%)的炎症评分也较低。每个参与者地址 270 米范围内的周围绿化与女性的炎症评分较低相关(β值= -18.9%,95%CI:-28.9%,-7.4%),但与男性无关。敏感性分析评估未测量的混杂因素和选择偏差,结果仍然稳健。
我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即不良的社区环境可能通过独立于行为风险因素的途径导致炎症,包括心理社会压力和有毒环境。