Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tasmania 7004, Australia.
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, School Road, Newnham, Tasmania 7248, Australia.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2022 Apr;177:113482. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113482. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Global plastics production is increasing exponentially and contributing to significant pollution of the marine environment. Of particular concern is ingestion and entanglement risks for marine wildlife, including when items such as rope are incorporated into nest structures. These events are commonly documented using photographic and visual surveys, and each presents a number of challenges and benefits for species conservation and monitoring. Here we compare an invasive (i.e., removing debris from nests) and non-invasive (i.e., photographs) sampling method for quantifying nest debris using the silver gull (Chroicocephalus novahollandiae) as a case study. Overall, 17 debris items were detected in 9% of gull nests. While the use of photographs to monitor nest debris is increasingly popular, the invasive method detected one additional debris item not identified using photography. We therefore recommend caution for nest debris and other monitoring programs where identifying small or cryptic items may require a high level of skill.
全球塑料产量呈指数级增长,对海洋环境造成了重大污染。特别令人关注的是,海洋野生动物面临着吞食和缠绕的风险,尤其是当绳子等物品被纳入巢结构中时。这些事件通常通过摄影和视觉调查来记录,而每一种方法对于物种保护和监测都有一系列的挑战和益处。在这里,我们比较了一种侵入性(即从巢中清除碎片)和非侵入性(即拍照)的取样方法,以银鸥(Chroicocephalus novahollandiae)为例来量化巢中的碎片。总的来说,在 9%的海鸥巢中发现了 17 个碎片。虽然使用照片来监测巢中的碎片越来越流行,但侵入性方法检测到了一个用摄影无法识别的额外碎片。因此,我们建议在巢中碎片和其他监测计划中要谨慎,因为识别小或隐藏的物品可能需要很高的技能水平。