Suppr超能文献

足底筋膜炎患者的强化物理治疗与家庭运动及定制矫形鞋垫的比较:初步研究。

Intensive physiotherapy versus home-based exercise and custom-made orthotic insoles in patients with plantar fasciitis: Pilot study.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Foot (Edinb). 2022 May;51:101906. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2022.101906. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective pilot study assessed the feasibility of comparing intensive physiotherapy group (IPG), home-based exercise (HBEG) group, and insole group (IG) to find the most effective treatment program for plantar fasciitis.

METHODS

Thirty-nine individuals with plantar fasciitis were selected to participate in this pilot study. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, as IPG (manual interventions, exercise, insoles), HBEG (exercise, insoles), and IG (insoles). The feasibility details including percentage of the enrollment and adherence to the groups were recorded. Pain was measured with a visual analog scale, and dorsiflexion range of motion (DROM), foot function, and health-related quality of life were evaluated at the baseline and week 6. One-way ANOVA analysis and Kruskal Wallis test were used to determine the differences of the percentage change of the parameters.

RESULTS

Pain and functional evaluation results showed improvements clinically in all of groups and quality of life results were similar for all groups. There was no difference between the groups after 6 weeks of treatment (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 treatment programs were found clinically applicable with high patient adherence. According to the data all intervention types were found moderately effective for pain and function. Insoles could be an option applied alone or with other treatments, and manual techniques gave better results in patients with limited ankle dorsiflexion. Although the results should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size, these results were found promising and feasible to conduct a future RCT.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

RCT 06144834.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性试点研究评估了强化物理治疗组(IPG)、家庭运动组(HBEG)和鞋垫组(IG)的比较,以找到治疗足底筋膜炎最有效的治疗方案。

方法

选择 39 名足底筋膜炎患者参加本试点研究。患者随机分为 3 组,即 IPG(手法干预、运动、鞋垫)、HBEG(运动、鞋垫)和 IG(鞋垫)。记录可行性细节,包括入组率和对组别的依从性。疼痛采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量,背屈活动度(DROM)、足部功能和健康相关生活质量在基线和第 6 周进行评估。采用单因素方差分析和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较参数变化的百分比差异。

结果

疼痛和功能评估结果显示,所有组均有临床改善,所有组的生活质量结果相似。治疗 6 周后,组间无差异(P>0.05)。

结论

3 种治疗方案均具有较高的患者依从性,临床上适用。根据数据,所有干预类型在疼痛和功能方面均被认为是中度有效。鞋垫可单独或与其他治疗方法一起应用,手法技术在踝关节背屈受限的患者中效果更好。由于样本量小,结果应谨慎解释,但这些结果具有开展未来 RCT 的前景和可行性。

临床试验注册号

RCT06144834。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验