Department of Physical Therapy, School of Integrative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand.
School of Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62999-9.
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a new therapeutic approach (cassava wax bath: CWB) compared with usual care (paraffin wax bath: PWB) in patients with plantar fasciitis (PF). Forty patients with PF were recruited into the study (CWB group, n = 20, PWB group, n = 20). Patients in the CWB group received cassava wax bath and patients in the PWB group received usual care (PWB). The primary outcome was pain intensity (PI). The secondary outcomes were the pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain frequency (PFr), foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM), and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ADROM). All outcomes were assessed before and after the five-week intervention, one month, and three months after the intervention period. After the intervention, statistically significant improvement was found in all outcomes after the intervention period and during the one month and three months follow-up study in both groups (P < 0.05). For all outcomes, no between-group differences were seen at any post-assessment time-point, except for PFr (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that CWB was significantly superior to PWB in reducing PFr. For the other outcomes, CWB and PWB were both equally effective in reducing PI and increasing PPT, FAAM, and ADROM in patients with PF. Therefore, CWB might be considered as a novel useful therapeutic option for PF patients.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) (Identification number: TCTR20220128002), First posted date: 28/01/2022.
本研究旨在探讨一种新的治疗方法(木薯蜡浴:CWB)与常规护理(石蜡蜡浴:PWB)在足底筋膜炎(PF)患者中的疗效。将 40 名 PF 患者纳入研究(CWB 组,n = 20,PWB 组,n = 20)。CWB 组患者接受木薯蜡浴,PWB 组患者接受常规护理(PWB)。主要结局是疼痛强度(PI)。次要结局是压力疼痛阈值(PPT)、疼痛频率(PFr)、足踝能力测量(FAAM)和踝关节背屈活动范围(ADROM)。所有结果均在干预前、干预后 5 周、干预后 1 个月和 3 个月进行评估。干预后,两组在干预期间和干预后 1 个月和 3 个月的随访研究中,所有结果均有统计学显著改善(P<0.05)。除 PFr(P<0.05)外,在任何随访评估时间点,两组间所有结果均无差异。总之,本研究结果表明,CWB 在降低 PFr 方面明显优于 PWB。对于其他结果,CWB 和 PWB 在降低 PI 以及增加 PF 患者的 PPT、FAAM 和 ADROM 方面同样有效。因此,CWB 可能被认为是 PF 患者的一种新的有用的治疗选择。试验注册:泰国临床试验注册中心(TCTR)(注册号:TCTR20220128002),首次发布日期:2022 年 1 月 28 日。